Kontakt X:X | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2025.042

The role of nurses in interprofessional pharmaceutical care: a qualitative descriptive study of international expert perspectivesNursing - Original article

Marko Petrović1, *, Mirko Prosen2
1 Health Centre Izola, Ambulance Services, Izola, Slovenia
2 University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izola, Slovenia

Introduction: Pharmaceutical care has evolved from a pharmacist-led model to an interprofessional approach involving doctors, pharmacists, and nurses. Effective collaboration is key to patient safety and treatment optimisation, yet it is often hindered by hierarchical systems, unclear roles, and poor communication. A lack of formalised frameworks further limits collaboration.

Aim: This study explores interprofessional collaboration in pharmaceutical care, focusing on the role of nurses, their involvement in collaborative practice, and the competencies essential for effective teamwork as identified by international experts.

Methods: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with five international experts, selected through purposive sampling. Data were thematically analysed using Atlas.ti. Rigour was ensured through triangulation, multiple coding, and participant feedback. The COREQ checklist guided reporting.

Results: Five themes emerged: (1) Interprofessional collaboration, (2) Roles and responsibilities, (3) Barriers to collaboration, (4) Education and competencies, and (5) Organizational support.

Discussion: Despite the recognized value of collaboration, systemic and educational obstacles persist. Structural backing, clarified roles, and integrated training are essential for improving teamwork.

Conclusion: Interprofessional collaboration is vital to enhancing pharmaceutical care. Addressing educational gaps, formalising procedures, and using digital tools can strengthen care delivery and patient outcomes. Nurses play a key role in pharmaceutical care through treatment monitoring and identifying medication-related problems. Expanding their roles within teams can improve safety. Policymakers should prioritize role clarity, interprofessional education, and digital support systems.

Keywords: Healthcare teamwork; Interprofessional collaboration; Nursing role; Pharmaceutical care; Policy development
Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Received: August 1, 2025; Revised: August 26, 2025; Accepted: September 18, 2025; Prepublished online: September 23, 2025 

Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alhawsawi AN, Muhammed WM, Almaimony AG, Alraffaa YA, Jeadi MA, Aldossari WH, et al. (2023). Exploring interprofessional communication and collaboration among pharmacists, nurses, and laboratories enhancing patient safety and healthcare outcomes. Int J Health Sci 7(S1): 3165-3177. DOI: 10.53730/ijhs.v7nS1.14703. Go to original source...
    2. Asiamah N, Mensah HK, Oteng‑Abayie EF (2017). General, target and accessible population: Demystifying the concepts for effective sampling. Qualitative Rep 22(6): 1607-1621. DOI: 10.46743/2160‑3715/2017.2674. Go to original source...
    3. Aljamal MS, Alrowili ASM (2019). Clinical pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, and the quality of drug therapy. IJMDC 3(3): 302-306. DOI: 10.24911/IJMDC.51‑1543620246. Go to original source...
    4. Bogner A, Littig B, Menz W (Eds) (2009). Interviewing experts. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-282. Go to original source...
    5. Bollen A, Harrison R, Aslani P, van Haastrecht JCM (2019). Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration between community pharmacists and general practitioners - A systematic review. Health Soc Care Community 27(4): e189-e212. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12705. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Coenen I, De Baetselier E, Foulon V, Dilles T (2024). Implementation of Interprofessional Pharmaceutical Care Initiatives: Lessons Learned from Successful Bottom-Up Initiatives in Primary Care. Int J Integr Care 24(2): 5. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7581. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Council of Europe (2020). Resolution CM/Res(2020)3 on the implementation of pharmaceutical care for the benefit of patients and health services. [online] [cit. 2025-03-10]. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/09000016809cdf26
    8. De Baetselier E, Dilles T, Feyen H, Haegdorens F, Mortelmans L, Van Rompaey B (2021). Nurses' responsibilities and tasks in pharmaceutical care: A scoping review. Nurs Open 9(6): 2562-2571. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.984. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. De Baetselier E, Van Rompaey B, Batalha LM, Bergqvist M, Czarkowska-Paczek B, De Santis A, et al. (2020). EUPRON: nurses' practice in interprofessional pharmaceutical care in Europe. A cross-sectional survey in 17 countries. BMJ Open 10(6): e036269. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Dijkstra NE, De Baetselier E, Dilles T, Van Rompaey B, da Cunha Batalha LM, Filov I, et al. (2021). Developing a competence framework for nurses in pharmaceutical care: A Delphi study. Nurse Educ Today 104: 104926. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104926. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Dilles T, Heczkova J, Tziaferi S, Helgesen AK, Grøndahl VA, Van Rompaey B, et al. (2021). Nurses and Pharmaceutical Care: Interprofessional, Evidence-Based Working to Improve Patient Care and Outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(11): 5973. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115973. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Döringer S (2020). The problem‑centred expert interview'. Combining qualitative interviewing approaches for investigating implicit expert knowledge. Int J Soc Res Methodol 24(3): 265-278. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2020.1766777. Go to original source...
    13. Gleeson L, O'Brien GL, O'Mahony D, Byrne S (2023). Interprofessional communication in the hospital setting: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. J Interprof Care 37(2): 203-213. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2028746. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Halme M, Piekkari R, Matos S, Wierenga M, Hall J (2024). Rigour vs. reality: Contextualizing qualitative research in the low-income settings in emerging markets. Br J Manag 35: 36-51. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12690. Go to original source...
    15. Helgesen AK, Nome CM, Stenbjerg JK, Arnesen MH, Aardalen TR, Dilles T, Grøndahl VA (2024). Pharmaceutical care in primary healthcare - A study of nurses', pharmacists', and physicians' experiences of interprofessional collaboration. Healthcare 12(11): 1100. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. James J, Xiao C, Li Y, Lin C (2024). On the rigour of scientific writing: Criteria, analysis, and insights. arXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.04981. Go to original source...
    17. Kiger ME, Varpio L (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach 42(8): 846-854. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Petrović M, Osmančević B, Ličen S, Karnjuš I, Prosen M (2021). Oblikovanje modela medpoklicnega sodelovanja medicinskih sester na področju zagotavljanja farmacevtske skrbi [The development of a model of interprofessional collaboration of nurses in pharmaceutical care: A qualitative descriptive study]. Obzornik Zdr N 55(2): 92-101. DOI: 10.14528/snr.2021.55.2.3034. Go to original source...
    19. Petrović M, Prosen M, Ličen S, Karnjuš I (2023). The attitude of health care professionals towards prescribing medicines: A mixed-method study. Obzornik Zdr N 57(2): 89-99. DOI: 10.14528/snr.2023.57.2.3163. Go to original source...
    20. Renjith V, Yesodharan R, Noronha JA, Ladd E, George A (2021). Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research. Int J Prev Med 12: 20. DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_321_19. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Šanc P, Prosen M (2022). Medpoklicno sodelovanje v interdisciplinarnih zdravstvenih timih: kvantitativna opisna raziskava [Interprofessional collaboration in interdisciplinary healthcare teams: A quantitative descriptive study]. Obzornik Zdr N 56(1): 9-21. DOI: 10.14528/snr.2022.56.1.3106. Go to original source...
    22. Sudeshika T, Naunton M, Yee KC, Deeks LS, Peterson GM, Kosari S (2022). Patients' opinions towards the services of pharmacists based in general practice. Pharmacy 10(4): 78. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy10040078. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Thorne S (2016). Interpretive description. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 15 p. Go to original source...
    24. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19(6): 349-357. DOI: org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Go to original source...
    25. Vestergaard E, Nørgaard B (2018). Interprofessional collaboration: An exploration of possible prerequisites forsuccessful implementation. J Interprof Care 32(2): 185-195. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1363725. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. World Medical Association (2013). WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical principles for medical research involving
    27. human participants. [online] [cit. 2025-03-12]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return