Kontakt 2006, 8(1):25-30 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2006.005

Methodological notes to problems of validation of nursing diagnosesNursing

Elena Holmanová*, Katarína Žiaková, Juraj Čáp
Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Jesseniova lekárska fakulta v Martine, Ústav ošetrovateľstva

Research in the field of validation of nursing diagnoses included in the classification system NANDA International represents a process continuing for a period of over 30 years with a coordinated international cooperation. The terminology system NANDA International was also widely established in our country, mainly in the field of special publications, education curricula, etc. In the course of 15 years of its implementation under our conditions we can record a critical reflection related to the terminology vagueness as well as ambiguousness of diagnoses or diagnostic characters and tendencies to different modifications which restrict its meaningfulness and usefulness in the practice, research and education. The authors of the contribution analyze existing working frameworks (strategies, models) and propose a scheme of working framework of validation studies, which implement particular stages of the validation procedure in the following sequence: providing of conceptual diagnostic terms, validation by experts and clinical validation by nurses.

Keywords: validation; NANDA International; conceptual analysis; validation by experts; clinical validation

Published: May 26, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Holmanová E, Žiaková K, Čáp J. Methodological notes to problems of validation of nursing diagnoses. Kontakt. 2006;8(1):25-30. doi: 10.32725/kont.2006.005.
Download citation

References

  1. ACENDIO (Association for European Common Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes) [online]. [cit. 2005-01-08]. Dostupné na internete:http://www.acendio.net
  2. ACENDIO Newsletter [online] No 13, 2003. [cit. 2005-09-21]. Dostupné z internete:http://www.acendio.net.
  3. CARPENITO, L. J.: Nursing Diagnosis Application to Clinical Practice. Lippicot, Philadelphia, 1993.
  4. Center For Nursing Classification And Clinical Effectiveness University Iowa [online]. [cit. 2006-01-28]. Dostupné z internete:http://www.nursing.uiowa.edu.
  5. CLOSKEY, J., BUCHELEK, G.: Nursing Interventions Classification - Intervention Project. Mosby, Iowa, 2000.
  6. CREASON, S. N.: Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 15:123-132, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. CREASON, N., S., POGUE, N. J., NELSON, A., A., HOYT, C., A.: Validating the nursing diagnosis of impaired physical mobility. Nursing Clinics of North America 20: 669-683, 1985. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Concept Analysis Tutorial Unit I N 750.: [online]. [cit. 2005-01-20]. Dostupné z: http://www.kumc.edu/
  9. ENACOTT, R.: Clarifying the concept of need: a comparison of two approaches to concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 25: 471-476m, 1997. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. HARDIKER, N. R., RECTOR, A.: Structural Validation of Nursing Terminologies. J Am MED INFORM ASSOC 8: 212-221, 2001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. FAWCETT, J.: Analysis and Evaluation of Contemporary Nursing Knowledge, Nursing Models and Theories. F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, 2000.
  12. FEHRING, R. J.: Validating diagnostic labels: Standardized methodology. M.E. Hurley (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference. Mosby, St. Louis, 1986.
  13. FLORIN, J., EHRENBERG, A.: Quality of Nursing Diagnoses: Evaluation of an Educational Intervention. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 16: 33-43, 2005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. GAVORA, P.: Úvod do pedagogického výskumu. Bratislava, Univerzita Komenského, 1999.
  15. GIMEŃES, A. M., GALARDO, P. S.: Clinical Validation Spaof Dysfunctional Ventilatory Weaning Response. Presented Papers: Nursing Diagnosis. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 14: 4-5, 2003. Go to original source...
  16. GORDON, M. et al.: Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions@Classification 2001 - 2002. F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, 2001.
  17. JOHNSON, M., BULECHEK, G., DOCHTERMAN, J. M., MAAS, M., MOORHEAD, S.: Nursing Diagnoses, Outcomes, Interventions: NANDA, NOC & NIC linkages. Mosby, St. Luis, 2001.
  18. JOHNSON, M., MAAS, M., MOORHEAD, S.: Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC)- Iowa Outcomes Project. Mosby, Inc., St. Luis, 2000.
  19. LAMONT, S. CH.: Discomfort as a Potential Nursing Diagnosis: A Concept Analysis and Literature Review. Presented Papers: Nursing Diagnosis. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 14: 4-5, 2003. Go to original source...
  20. LEVIN, R. F., LUNNEY, M.: Improving Diagnostic Accuracy Using A Evidence - Based Nursing Model. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 15: 114-122, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. MAREČKOVÁ, J., JAROŠOVÁ, D.: NANDA domény v posouzení a diagnostické fázi ošetřovatelského procesu. Ostravská univerzita, Zdravotně sociální fakulta, Ostrava, 2005.
  22. MARŠÁLOVÁ, L., MIKŠÍK, O. ET AL.: Metodológia a metódy psychologického výskumu. Bratislava, SPN, 1990.
  23. MCKENZIE, N.: Review of Concept Analyses. [online]. [cit. 2005-01-20]. Dostupné na internete: http://www.graduateresearch.com/index.shtml.
  24. MCCLOSKEY, J., C., BULECHEK, G., M.: Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) - Intervention Project Iowa. Mosby, Inc., St. Luis, 2000.
  25. NANDA INTERNATIONAL (North American Association for Nursing Diagnosis International) [online]. [cit. 2006-01-29]. Dostupné na internete http://www.nanda.org/html.
  26. NAVULURI, B., N.: A Concept Analysis of Dress. [online]. [cit. 2005-01-20]. Dostupné na internete: http://www.graduateresearch.com/index.shtml.
  27. OGASAWARA, C., MATSUKI, M., OHNO, Y., MASUTANI, E. et al.: Validation of the defining characteristics of body image disturbance Japan. Nurs Diag 10: 15-20, 1999. Go to original source...
  28. OLIVEIRA, N., CHIANCA, T., C., M.: Validation of Anxiety by Brazilian Nurses. Presented Papers: Nursing Diagnosis. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 14: 4-5, 2003. Go to original source...
  29. PETRÁČKOVÁ, V., KRAUS, J. ET AL.: Akademický slovník cizích slov. Praha, Academia, 2001.
  30. RUSH, K., L., OUELLET, L., L.: Mobility: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 18: 486-492, 1993. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. VILCINSKY OLIVA, A. P., LOPES MONTEIRO DA CRUZ, D. A.: Decreased Cardiac Output: Validation With Postoperative Heart Surgery Patients. Presented Papers: Nursing Diagnosis. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 14: 4-5, 2003. Go to original source...
  32. WHITLEY, G. G.: Three phases of research validating nursing diagnoses. West J Nurs Res 19: 379-399, 1997. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. WHITLEY, G. G.: Processes and methodologies for research validation of nursing diagnoses. Nurs Diagn. 10:5-14, 1999. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...