Kontakt 2006, 8(2):370-375 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2006.059

Living organisms as real-time detectors of toxic pollution of waterBiomedicine

Šárka Veselá
Ústřední vojenská nemocnice v Praze, odbor rozvoje, výzkumu a vývoje

For the detection of the toxic pollution over real time, so called biological early warning systems (BEWS) were developed. They are devices using living organisms as detectors of toxic pollution and comprising several parts: A water delivery system, an experimental chamber, an electronic or mechanical sensor (camera), from which the data measured are transmitted to an analyzer and alarm system, which will announce the toxicity found. The pollution monitoring is essentially continuous or it is performed repeatedly at very short intervals, time necessary for the detection is reduced to a minimum period, and the pollution detection is non-specific. For purposes of living biological detectors, fish, clams, water fleas and algae are most frequently used. The BEWS instruments were stepwise developed. Immobility or possibly death of the organism tested was first followed and latter applications were aimed at following changes in the behaviour and in physiologic parameters. BEWS are widely used for the on line monitoring of the toxic pollution. They are employed for monitoring the water quality and detection of accidents or deliberate pollution of rivers, following of water quality discharged from production enterprises, factories, waste water treatment plants and for monitoring the health non-harmfulness of water in water supply systems. The target of the work is to present basic data about problems of the BEWS and to make the reader familiar with the principle of the BEWS, with their possibilities and restrictions, with their use, principle of their function and with organisms used for their operation.

Keywords: biological early warning systems; BEWS; on-line detection; biodetector; biomonitoring

Published: December 15, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Veselá Š. Living organisms as real-time detectors of toxic pollution of water. Kontakt. 2006;8(2):370-375. doi: 10.32725/kont.2006.059.
Download citation

References

  1. BALDWIN, I. G., HARMAN, M. M. I., NEVILLE, D. A.: Performance characteristics of a fish monitor for detection of toxic substances - I. Laboratory trials. Water Research, 1994. Vol. 28, s. 2191-2199. Go to original source...
  2. BROSNAN T. M. et. al.: Early warning monitoring to detect hazardous events in water supplies. An ILSI Risk Science Institute Workshop Report: ILSI, 1999, s.37.
  3. CAIRNS, J., VAN DER SCHALIE, W. H.: Biological monitoring Part I - Early warning systems. Water Research, 1980. Vol. 14, s. 1179-1196. Go to original source...
  4. ČSN EN ISO 28692. Jakost vod - Zkouška inhibice růstu sladkovodních řas Scenedesmus subspicatus a Selenastrum capricornutum. Praha: ČNI 1995, 2000. s. 12.
  5. ČSN EN ISO 6341. Jakost vod - Zkouška inhibice pohyblivosti Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea) - Zkouška akutní toxicity. Praha: ČNI, 1997. s. 16.
  6. ČSN ISO 10706. Jakost vod - Stanovení chronické toxicity látek pro Daphnia magna Strauss (Cladocera, Crustacea). Praha: ČNI, 2001. s. 20.
  7. FARRÉ, M., BARCELÓ, D.: Toxicity testing of wastewater and sewage sludge by biosensors, bioassays and chemical analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2003. Vol. 22, s. 299-310. Go to original source...
  8. FUKSA, J. K.: Biomonitoring českého Labe: výsledky z let 1993-1996-1999. Praha: Výzkumný ústav vodohospodářský T. G. Masaryka, 2003, s. 103.
  9. GALLO, M. A.: History and scope of toxicology. In: Klaassen, C.D. (ed), Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. The basic science of poisons. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Publishing Division, 2001. s. 3-10.
  10. GREGOR, J., MARŠÁLEK, B.: Biologické systémy včasného varování - on-line detekce přítomnosti toxických látek ve vodě. In: Kočí, V., Maršálek, B., Tlustá, P. (eds.), Ekotoxikologické biotesty IV, 15.-17. září 2004, Chrudim. s. 106-112.
  11. GULLICK, R. W. et al.: Design of early warning monitoring systems for source waters. American Water Works Association Journal, 2003. Vol. 95, no 11, s. 58-72. Go to original source...
  12. GUNATILAKA, A., DIEHL, P.: A brief review of chemical and biological continuous monitoring of rivers in Europe and Asia. In: Gunatilaka, A., Gonsebatt, M.E. (eds.), Biomonitors and Biomarkers as indicators of environmental change. Vol. II., Butterworth, F. M., New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishing Corp., 2000. s. 9-28. Go to original source...
  13. CHUN, U-H. et al.: Continuous pollution monitoring using Photobacterium phosphoreum. Resources, conservation and recycling, 1996.Vol. 18, s. 25-40. Go to original source...
  14. KAMER, K. J. M., JENNER, H. A., DE ZWART, D.: The valve movement response of mussels: a tool in biological monitoring. Hydrobiologia, 1989. Vol. 188/189, s. 433-443. Go to original source...
  15. LANGE, C. R., LANGE, S. R.: Biomonitoring. Water Environment Research. Vol. 69, s. 900-915.
  16. LECHELT, M. et al., 2000. Monitoring of surface water by ultra-sensitive daphnia toximeter. Environmental toxicology, 1997. Vol. 15, s. 390-400. Go to original source...
  17. LEYNEN, M. et al.: The use of Tubificidae in a biological early warning system. Environmental Pollution, 1999. Vol. 105, s. 151-154. Go to original source...
  18. MAXWELL, K., JOHNSON, G. N.: Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000. Vol. 51, s. 659-668. Go to original source...
  19. SHEDD, T. R. et al.: Long-term operation of an automated fish biomonitoring system for continuous effluent acute toxicity surveillance. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2001. Vol. 66, s. 392-399. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. SCHARF, B., W.: A fish test alarm device for the continual recording of acute toxic substance in water. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 1979. Vol. 85, s. 250-256.
  21. STATES, S. et al.: Utility based analytical methods to ensure public water supply security. American Water Works Association Journal, 2003. Vol. 95, no. 4, s. 103-115. Go to original source...
  22. TAHEDL, H., HÄDER, D. P.: Automated biomonitoring using real time movement analysis of Euglena gracilis. Ecotoxicology Environmental Safety, 2001. Vol. 48, s. 161-169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. VAN DER SCHALIE et al.: Using higher organisms in biological early warning systems for real-time toxicity detection. Biosensensors Bioelectronics, 2001. Vol. 16, s. 457-465. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. VESELÁ, Š.: Co víme (a nevíme) o perloočkách. Perloočky v ekotoxikologii. In: Kočí, V., Maršálek, B., Tlustá, P. (eds.), Ekotoxikologické biotesty IV, 15.-17. září 2004, Chrudim, s. 18-25. Go to original source...