Kontakt 2012, 14(1):30-38 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2012.005

Contents validation of nursing diagnosis "Fear"Nursing

Renáta Zeleníková1,*, Yvetta Vrublová1, Darja Jarošová1, Katarína Žiaková2
1 Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě, Lékařská fakulta, Ústav ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence
2 Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Jesseniova lekárska fakulta v Martine, Ústav ošetrovateľstva

In the NANDA-International classification system, the nursing diagnosis "Fear" (code 00148) is included in the Domain 9: Stress management. It is defined as an emotional reaction to a threat, which is perceived as a danger and contains 34 defining characteristics.
The target of the research was validation of the treatment diagnosis "Fear" in the Czech and Slovak Republics, i.e. determination of defining characteristics considered by Czech and Slovak nurses - experts - as principal and minor ones.
The Fehring diagnostic contents validity was chosen for the validation of the nursing diagnosis "Fear". An assessment tool was prepared for the data accumulation consisting of a list of 34 defining characteristics of the nursing diagnosis "Fear" according to the NANDA-International and identification data. The group included 90 Czech and 93 Slovak nurses, who acquired at least 4 points in accordance with modified Fehring criteria (Zeleníková et al., 2010, p. 410). The research was implemented from May to October 2010.
The group of Czech nurses considered two characters as principal features of the nursing diagnosis "Fear" among the 34 defining characteristics: expression of the fright (0.86) and expression of the horror (0.77). Twenty four characters were considered as minor features in the group of Czech nurses. Seven defining characteristics were marked by Czech experts as non-significant for the nursing diagnosis Fear: vomiting, anorexia, paleness, diarrhoea, dry mouth, reduced learning capability, fatigue. The group of Slovak nurses considered only one principal defining characteristic of the nursing diagnosis Fear: identification of the fear object (0.76). The group of Slovak nurses considers 27 characters as minor characteristics. Five characters were considered by the group of Slovak nurses as non-significant for the treatment diagnosis "Fear": impulsiveness, dry mouth, nausea, vomiting and fatigue.

Keywords: validation; nursing diagnosis; fear; expert; DCV model

Received: November 25, 2011; Accepted: February 16, 2012; Published: March 16, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zeleníková R, Vrublová Y, Jarošová D, Žiaková K. Contents validation of nursing diagnosis "Fear". Kontakt. 2012;14(1):30-38. doi: 10.32725/kont.2012.005.
Download citation

References

  1. Adams P et al. (1997). Anxiety/Fear. In Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Glendale, CA: Cinahl, p. 421-425.
  2. Clayton JL (2008). Special needs of older adults undergoing surgery. AORN Journal. 87/3: 557-570. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Fehring RJ (1986). Validation diagnostic labels: standardized methodology. In Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the Sixth conference. St. Louis: Mosby, p. 183-190.
  4. Hartl P, Hartlová H (2000). Psychologický slovník. Praha: Portál, 776 s.
  5. Jandourek J (2001). Sociologický slovník. Praha: Portál, 288 s.
  6. Jones PE, Jakob DF (1984). Anxiety revisited - from a practice perspective. In: Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. St. Louis: Mosby, p. 285-290.
  7. Kim MJ (1982). Historical Development of Diagnostic Nomenclature. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Third and Fourth National Conferences. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 386-393.
  8. Mazalová L, Marečková J, Kameníčková J, Mikšová Z (2011). Klinická validizace ošetřovatelské diagnózy Strach - 00148 v pediatrické ošetřovatelské péči. In Teória, výskum a vzdelávanie v ošetrovateľstve. Ústav ošetrovateľstva JLF UK: Martin, s. 228-237.
  9. NANDA International (2009). Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions & Classification 2009-2011. Ed. T. H. Herdman. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 435 p.
  10. Pritchard MJ (2009). Managing anxiety in the elective surgical patient. British Journal of Nursing. 18/9: 416-419. Go to original source...
  11. Reichel J (2009). Kapitoly metodologie sociálních výzkumů Praha: Grada, 192 s.
  12. Taylor-Loughran AE, O'Brien ME, LaChapelle R, Rangel S (1989). Defining characteristics of the nursing diagnoses Fear and Anxiety: a validation study. Applied Nursing Research. 2/4: 178-186. Go to original source...
  13. Yocom CJ (1984). The differentiation of fear and anxiety. In Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. St. Louis: Mosby, p. 352-355.
  14. Whitley GG (1992a). Concept Analysis of Anxiety. Nursing Diagnosis. 3/3: 107-116. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Whitley GG (1992b). Concept Analysis of Fear. Nursing Diagnosis. 3/4: 155-161. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Whitley GG (1994). Expert Validation and Differentiation of the Nursing Diagnoses Anxiety and Fear. Nursing Diagnosis. 5/4: 143-150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Zeleníková R, Žiaková K, Čáp J, Jarošová D, Vrublová Y (2010). Návrh kritérií výberu expertov pre validizáciu ošetrovateľských diagnóz v ČR a SR. Kontakt. 12/4: 407-413. Go to original source...
  18. Žiaková K et al. (2009). Ošetrovateľský slovník Martin: Osveta, 218 s.