Kontakt 2012, 14(1):59-67 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2012.008

Consensus and conflict in families taking care of seniorsHealth and Social Sciences - Original article

Pavla Procházková*, Romana Trusinová
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Fakulta sociálních věd

The authors deal with the inter-generation solidarity under conditions of taking care of seniors who are not self-sufficient. They were particularly focused on studying one aspect of the family solidarity concept: solidarity of agreement. They tried to combine conflict and consensual attitudes to this problem and thus to characterize the nature of conflicts and harmony in families taking care of seniors. The target of the study was mapping of relationships between the life harmony and manifested conflicts between persons providing and accepting the care and finding differences in this field between families taking care of seniors under different conditions.
After presenting basic terms, outlining the research targets and introducing the theoretical background, the authors present results of their empiric sociological research. Standardized interviews were performed with 405 respondents taking care of their own aging parents or aging parents of their partners. In the section Results, a general relationship between the degree of harmony and conflicts in the families inquired is first described and the families are subsequently compared depending on the method of taking care of the senior. For the comparison, families taking care of seniors at home, families taking care of seniors in a separate household and families transferring the senior to the institutional care were differentiated from each other. The results indicate that there are differences in the degree and nature of conflicts depending on different types of the family arrangement. Typology of families was established to facilitate the description of relationships between the concepts of the consent, conflict and method of taking the care. The results demonstrated that it is impossible to idealize the solidarity in families taking care of seniors in their own households and indicated requirements for supplementing the model of the family solidarity by an investigation of conflicts. During this, they may not behave as a barrier in the family solidarity, but they may rather serve as an indicator of the interest and mutual dependence reducing the personal autonomy.

Keywords: family solidarity; taking care of seniors; consensus; conflict; ambivalence; consensual solidarity

Received: November 23, 2011; Accepted: February 13, 2012; Published: March 16, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Procházková P, Trusinová R. Consensus and conflict in families taking care of seniors. Kontakt. 2012;14(1):59-67. doi: 10.32725/kont.2012.008.
Download citation

References

  1. Benešová R (2010). Hledání modelu péče o nesoběstačné rodinné členy. Kontakt. 12/4: 435-445. Go to original source...
  2. Bengtson VL (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family. Minneapolis. 63/1: 1-17. Go to original source...
  3. Bengtson VL, Roberts REL (1991). Intergenerational Solidarity in Aging Families: An Example of Formal Theory Construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 53/4: 856-871. Go to original source...
  4. Bengtson VL, Giarrusso R, Mabry JB, Silverstein M (2002). Solidarity, conflict and ambivalence: Complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? Journal of Marriage and Family. Minneapolis. 64/3: 568-577. Go to original source...
  5. Cicirelli VG (1992). Family Caregiving, Autonomous and Paternalistic Decision Making. London: Sage Library of Social Research, Sage Publications, 211 p.
  6. Chiriboga DA (1987). Social Supports. In: Maddox GL (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Aging. New York: Springer Publishing Comp, p. 635-638.
  7. Jeřábek H (2009). Rodinná péče o seniory jako "práce z lásky": nové argumenty. Sociologický časopis. 45/2: 243-265. Go to original source...
  8. Lang F, Baltes MM (1997). Being with People and Being Alone in Late Life: Costs and Benefits for Everyday Functioning. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 21/4: 729-746. Go to original source...
  9. Lüscher K, Pillemer K (1998). Intergenerational Ambivalence: A New Approach to the Study of Parent-Child Relations in Later Life. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 60: 413-425. Go to original source...
  10. Sýkorová D (2006). Od solidarity jako základu intergeneračních vztahů v rodině k ambivalenci a vyjednávání. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review. 42/4: 683-699. Go to original source...
  11. Szydlik M (2008). Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict: Two scenarios: Conflict and autonomy. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 39/1: 97-114. Go to original source...
  12. Šiklová J (2011). O pečovatelství se již mluví a točí se o něm i filmy. [online]. [cit. 2011-07-22]. Dostupné z: http://www.pecujdoma.cz/publicistika/nazory/sakramenta-jiiny-iklove/410-jiina-iklova-o-peovatelstvi-se-ji-mluvi-i-toi-filmy.html
  13. Van Gaalen R, Dykstra PA (2006). Solidarity and Conflict Between Adult Children and Parents: A Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family. 68/4: 947-960. Go to original source...
  14. Willson AE, Shuey KM, Elder GH, Jr. (2003). Ambivalence in the Relationship of Adult Children to Aging Parents and In-Laws. Journal of Marriage and Family. Minneapolis: 65/4: 1055. Go to original source...