Kontakt 2012, 14(3):286-297 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2012.032

Quality of life of women in pregnancy period: A study based on focus groupsNursing

Eva Vachková1,*, Jiří Mareš2
1 Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Lékařská fakulta v Hradci Králové, Ústav sociálního lékařství, oddělení ošetřovatelství
2 Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Lékařská fakulta v Hradci Králové, Ústav sociálního lékařství

In the contribution, the authors deal with the assessment of the quality of life of women in the period of their physiological pregnancy. The work first summarizes still existing knowledge concerning the research of the quality of life in the period of pregnancy obtained in abroad and describes methodological approaches to the examination of the quality of life in pregnant women. The targets of the research study were as follows: 1. Mapping of experiencing changes resulting from pregnancy and effects of these changes on the quality of life; 2. Identification of variables considerably affecting the quality of life in this period from the viewpoint of the women; 3. Accumulation of data for a proposal of questionnaire items for a new specific questionnaire, which would be able to sensitively detect the quality of life in pregnant women. The research sample included n = 23 pregnant women (in second to third trimesters) aged on average 32 years, s = 2.64. The data were acquired with the help of a qualitative method of focus groups, and at a further stage of the research, the methodology was based on a work by Strauss and Corbin (1999), particularly with the use of so called grounded theory. The data acquired were analyzed by encoding (open, axial and selective). The main outcome of the qualitative research study is a causal theoretical model summarizing opinions of women concerning the way of affecting the quality of life by physiological pregnancy. The authors identified those variables (associated with the quality of life), which were most considerably perceived by women affected by pregnancy. The qualitative methods made possible deeper assessment of experiencing the pregnancy and quality of life. The data obtained were used for a compilation of a specific questionnaire, which could be useful in determining the quality of life in a larger group of pregnant women.

Keywords: pregnancy; quality of life; focus groups; methods; questionnaire; WHOQOL-BREF; grounded theory

Received: February 22, 2012; Accepted: May 9, 2012; Published: September 27, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vachková E, Mareš J. Quality of life of women in pregnancy period: A study based on focus groups. Kontakt. 2012;14(3):286-297. doi: 10.32725/kont.2012.032.
Download citation

References

  1. Andělová K (2004). Diabetes a těhotenství. Zdravotnické noviny ČR. Příloha lékařské listy. 53/16: 18-19. ISSN 044-1996.
  2. Attard CL, Kohli MA, Coleman S, Bradley C, Hux M, Atanackovic G, Torrance GW (2002). The burden of illness of severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 186(5 Suppl. Understanding): S220-227. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Baďurová R (2005). Životní události, vnímaná sociální opora, somatické obtíže a nemoci během těhotenství jako predikátory prenatální mateřské anxiety a deprese. Československá psychologie. 49/5: 399-411. ISSN 0009-062X.
  4. Čech E et al. (2006). Porodnictví. 2. přeprac a dopl. vyd. Praha: Grada, 544 s.
  5. Kobilková J et al. (2005). Základy gynekologie a porodnictví. 1. vyd. Praha: Galén, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Nakladatelství Karolinum, 368 s.
  6. Koch KL, Frissora CL (2003). Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. Gastroenterol-Clin-North-Am. Mar; 32(1): 201-234 vi. ISSN 0889-8553. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Koren G, Boskovic R, Hard M, Maltepe C, Navioz Y, Einarson A (2002). Motherisk-PUQE (pregnancy-unique quantification of emesis and nausea) scoring system for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 186(5 Suppl. Understanding): S228-231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Křivohlavý J (2001). Psychologie zdraví. 2. vyd. Praha: Portál, s. r. o., 279 s. ISBN 80-7178-774-4.
  9. Kudela M (1997). Základy gynekologie a porodnictví. 2. vyd. Olomouc: Vydavatelství Univerzity Palackého, 199 s.
  10. Kurki T, Hiilesmaa V, Raitasalo R, Mattila H, Ylikorkala O (2000). Depression and anxiety in early pregnancy and risk for preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 95/4: 487-490. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Lacasse A, Rey E, Ferreira E, Morin C, Bérard A (2008). Validity of a modified Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis and Nausea (PUQE) scoring index to assess severity of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 198/1: 71.e1-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Lacroix R, Eason E, Melzack R (2000). Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy: A prospective study of its frequency, intensity, and patterns of change. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 182: 931-937. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Lane CA (2007). Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a tailored approach to treatment. Clin J Obstet Gynecol. 50/1: 154-165. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Leifer G (2004). Úvod do porodnického a pediatrického ošetřovatelství. 1. vyd. Praha: Grada Publishing, s. 55-80.
  15. Luke B, Avni M, Min L (1999). Work and pregnancy: The role of fatigue and the "second shift" on antenatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 181/5 Pt 1: 1172-1179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Magee LA, Chandra K, Mazzotta P, Stewart D, Koren G, Guyatt GH (2002). Development of a health-related quality of life instrument for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 186(5 Suppl. Understanding): S232-238. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Mareš J a kol. (2008). Kvalita života dětí a dospívajících III. 1. vyd. Brno: MSD spol. s. r. o., 235 s.
  18. Neggers Y, Goldenberg R, Cliver S, Haulth J (2006). The relationship between psychosocial profile, health practices, and pregnancy outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 85/3: 277-285. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Nicholson WK, Setse R, Hill-Brigs F, Cooper LA, Strobino D, Powe NR (2006). Depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 107/4: 798-806. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Olsson C, Nilsson-Wikmar L (2004). Health-related quality of life and physical ability among pregnant women with and without back pain in late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 83/4: 351-357. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Roztočil A a kol. (2001). Porodnictví. 1. vyd. Brno: IDVPZ, 333 s.
  22. Sherman PW, Flaxman SM (2002). Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy in an evolutionary perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 186(5 Suppl. Understanding): 190-197. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Sjöström H, Langius-Eklöf A, Hjertberg R (2004). Well-being and sense of coherence during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 83/12: 1112-1118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Smetanová D (1999). V průběhu těhotenství je důležitá nejen životospráva a kvalitní prenatální péče, ale i dostatek informací. Zdravotnické noviny, Příloha Lékařské listy. 48/39: 12-13. ISSN 0044-1996.
  25. Strauss A, Corbinová J (1999). Základy kvalitativního výzkumu. Postupy a techniky metody zakotvené teorie. 1. vyd. Brno: Sdružení Podané ruce, Albert. ISSBN 80-85834-60-X.
  26. Symon A (2003). A review of mothers prenatal and postnatal quality of life. In Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, I:38. [online]. [cit. 2009-04-08]. Dostupné z: http://www.hqlo.com/content/I/I38 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Štembera Z (2004). Historie české perinatologie. Praha: Maxdorf, s. 345-375. ISBN 80-7345-021-6.
  28. Vágnerová M (2000). Vývojová psychologie dětství, dospělost, stáří. 1. vydání. Praha: Portál, s. r. o., s. 301-373.
  29. van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de Pol G, Heintz AP, van der Vaart Ch (2006). What is the effect of overactive bladder symptoms on woman's quality of life during and after first pregnancy? BJU Int. 97/2: 296-300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. van de Pol G, de Leeuw JR, van Brumen HJ, Bruinse HW, Heintz AP, van der Vaart Ch (2006). The Pregnancy Mobility Index: A mobility scale during and after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 85/7: 786-791. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Veenhoven R (2000). The Four Qualities of Life. Journal of Happiness Studies. 1/1: 1-39. ISSN 1389-4978. Go to original source...