Kontakt 2016, 18(4):e231-e235 | DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2016.10.006

New challenges for the educational activities of midwives, gynaecologists and general practitionersNursing - Original article

Hana Konečnáa,c,*, Karolína Novákováb,c, Ta»ána Rumpíkovád
a University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of the Humanities in Nursing Professions, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
b Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Psychology, Brno, Czech Republic
c Adam Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
d Clinic of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology Zlín, Czech Republic

One of the basic tasks of midwives' and other sexual and reproductive care professionals' work is to help people fulfil their family plans. An important tool for achieving this is to offer reliable and relevant information. The aims of this paper are: (1) to map topics currently understood under the term "family planning"; (2) to assess their relevance to the current European situation; (3) to uncover other missing important topics, if needed. Secondary analysis of various documents (e.g. WHO definitions, demographical and medical statistics, relevant research data) showed that the term "family planning" is still being understood only in its negative connotation; thus as a way how not to have children. However, the current situation in developed countries shows that fulfilling parental desires is a similarly important issue. Reproductive healthcare professionals should have a good knowledge of medically assisted reproduction options, their procedures, benefits and risks. They should also be familiar with the causes of infertility (mainly with the avoidable ones), and support their clients on their journey to having a child.

Keywords: Midwifery; Education; Reproductive health; Family planning; Infertility

Received: July 14, 2016; Accepted: October 10, 2016; Published: November 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Konečná H, Nováková K, Rumpíková T. New challenges for the educational activities of midwives, gynaecologists and general practitioners. Kontakt. 2016;18(4):e231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2016.10.006.
Download citation

References

  1. Sociologický Ústav AV ČR. Jaké hodnoty jsou pro nás důleľité - červen 2014? [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c1/a7263/f3/ov140717.pdf
  2. International Confederation of Midwifes (ICM) International Definition of the Midwife. June 2011. [online] [cit. 2016-06-03]. Available from: http://internationalmidwives.org/assets/uploads/documents/Definition%20of%20the%20Midwife%20-%202011.pdf
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Health topics: Family planning. 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/family_planning/en
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). Family planning - a global handbook for providers. Evidence-based guidance developed through worldwide collaboration. Baltimore and Geneva: CCP and WHO; 2011. [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44028/1/9780978856373_eng.pdf
  5. International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://www.ippf.org/
  6. Czech Society for Family Planning and Sexual Education. [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://www.planovanirodiny.cz/index.php
  7. Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and sub regional levels and trends. Lancet 2016;388(10041):258-67. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky ČR (ÚZIS ČR). Abortion. 2013. [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://www.uzis.cz/katalog/zdravotnicka-statistika/potraty
  9. Národné centrum zdravotníckych informácií (NCZI). Potraty v SR 2014. Z© 20154;7. [online] [cit. 2016-06-03]. Available from: http://www.nczisk.sk/Documents/publikacie/2014/zs1507.pdf
  10. De la Rochebrochard E, Thonneau P. Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study. Human Reproduction 2002;17(6):1649-56. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Alviggi C, Humaidan P, Howles CM, Tredway D, Hillier SG. Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2009;7:101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Reproductive endocrinology and infertility committee Canada. Advanced reproductive age and fertility. Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology Canada 2011;33(11):1165-75.
  13. Prokopová I, Crha I. Předčasné ovariální selhání. Praktická gynekologie 2007;11(4):170-3.
  14. ESHRE guideline. Premature ovarian insufficiency is a clinical syndrome defined by loss of ovarian activity before the age of 40. ESHRE 2015. [online] [cit. 2016-06-03]. Available from: https://www.eshre.eu/Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Management-of-premature-ovarian-insufficiency.aspx
  15. Broekmans FJ, Faddy MJ, Scheffer G, Te Velde ER. Antral follicle counts are related to age at natural fertility loss and age at menopause. Menopause 2004;11:607-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Broekmans FJ, Knauff EAH, Te Velde ER, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 2007;18:58-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Connolly MP, Hoorens S, Chambers GM. The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Human Reproduction Update 2010;16:603-13. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Thümmler K, Britton A, Kirch W. Data and Information on Women's Health in the European Union. 2009. [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/population_groups/docs/women_report_en.pdf
  19. Sobotka T, Zeman K, Potančoková M, Eder J, Brzozowska Z, Beaujouan É, Matysiak A. Fertility Datasheet 2015. Vienna Institute of Demography/Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital. 2015. [online], [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://www.fertilitydatasheet.org/download/files/datasheet-poster.pdf
  20. Zvěřina J, Pohanka M. Zhorąuje se opravdu plodnost muľů? Zdraví E15, Lékařské listy 2014;3. [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://zdravi.euro.cz/clanek/priloha-lekarske-listy/zhorsuje-se-opravdu-plodnost-muzu-474768
  21. Trávník P. Muľská (ne)plodnost. Polemika s posly ąpatných zpráv. Vesmír 2014;93(12):718-20.
  22. Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky ČR (ÚZIS ČR). Asistovaná reprodukce 2013. Praha; 2015. [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://www.uzis.cz/rychle-informace/asistovana-reprodukce-2013
  23. Fertility Europe. Policy statements on prevention and access to treatments. 2016. [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://www.fertilityeurope.eu/
  24. Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky ČR (ÚZIS ČR). Asistovaná reprodukce v České republice 2013. Praha; 2015. [online] [cit. 2016-06-05]. Available from: http://www.uzis.cz/category/tematicke-rady/zdravotnicka-statistika/asistovana-reprodukce