Kontakt 2017, 19(1):e12-e16 | DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.01.008

Utilizing the Menopause Rating Scale questionnaire in electronic form for evaluating the quality of life in postmenopausal womenNursing - Original article

Markéta Moravcová*, Jana Holá
Univerzita Pardubice, Fakulta zdravotnických studií, Katedra porodní asistence a zdravotně sociální práce, Pardubice, Česká republika

The objective of the research study was to assess the possible use of a Czech standardized version of the Menopause Rating Scale questionnaire in electronic form, concerning the quality of women's life in the period affected by menopause.
The quantitative survey was conducted in 2015 on a sample of 364 respondents within the age range from 45 to 60 years with present oestrogen deficiency symptoms. The respondents filled in the Menopause Rating Scale questionnaire in their own social environment using an online form based on previous education. The data was then subjected to statistical evaluation; results were compared with the results of data collected in the form of a printed questionnaire.
Most frequently, the respondents reported a minor intensity of difficulties or absence of some symptoms. The respondents encountered the least distinctive difficulties in the urogenital domain. Based on the resulting values of the total score in the partial domains, we can state that the quality of women's life was only affected by the present estrogen deficiency to a minor extent. The results correspond with those of researches utilizing the form of a printed questionnaire.
One of the tasks of the clinical practice and preventive measures in the area of gynaecology and obstetrics is to prepare women to changes related to menopause and to provide them with adequate information. Medical staff must have such an evaluation instrument available that can be used for evaluating potential changes in this period and then help the women adequately. The Menopause Rating Scale is such a tool. The electronic form of this instrument appears to be a suitable form for initiating communication between the client and medical staff. At the same time it allows the woman to obtain initial and immediate feedback concerning her perceived problems.

Keywords: Electronic form; Quality of life; Menopause Rating Scale; Menopause; Estrogen deficiency

Received: November 14, 2016; Revised: January 6, 2017; Accepted: January 24, 2017; Published: March 28, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Moravcová M, Holá J. Utilizing the Menopause Rating Scale questionnaire in electronic form for evaluating the quality of life in postmenopausal women. Kontakt. 2017;19(1):e12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.01.008.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson D, Sievert LL, Melby MK, Obermeyer CM. Methods used in cross-cultural comparisons of sexual symptoms and their determinants. Maturitas 2011;70:135-40. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Glaser R, York AE, Dimitrakakis C. Beneficial effects of testosterone therapy in women measured by the validated Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). Maturitas 2011;68:355-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Chuni N, Sreeramareddy CHT. Frequency of symptoms, determinants of severe symptoms, validity of and cut-off score for Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) as a screening tool: A cross-sectional survey among midlife Nepalese women. BMC Women's Health 2011;11:30. Doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Dennerstein L, Helmes E. The Menopausal Transition and Quality of Life: Methodologic Issues. Quality of Life Research 2000;9:721-31. Go to original source...
  5. Křivohlavý J. Psychologie nemoci. Praha: Grada Publishing; 2002.
  6. Gladkij I a kol. Management ve zdravotnictví. Brno: Computer Press; 2003.
  7. Mareš J. Psychodiagnostika podporovaná počítačem. Praha: Ústav pro informace ve vzdělávání; 1992.
  8. Currie H. Menopause Matters; 2011. [online] [cit. 2016-07-09]. Dostupné z: http://www.menopausematters.co.uk/greenscore.php
  9. Moravcová M, Ježek S, Mareš J, Vachková E. Česká verze dotazníku Menopause Rating Scale - předběžné sdělení. Kontakt 2014; 16(2):114-22. Go to original source...
  10. Heinemann K, Ruebig A, Potthoff P, Schneider HPG, Strelow F, Heinemann LAJ et al. The Menopause Rating Scale: A Methodological Review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2004;2:45. Doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-45. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Moravcová M. Hodnocení kvality života žen po menopauze. Hradec Králové: Univerzita Karlova, Lékařská fakulta UK v Hradci Králové. Školitel: prof. PhDr. Jiří Mareš, CSc.; 2014.
  12. Krajewska-Ferishah K, Krajewska-Kułak E, Terlikowski S, Wiktor H, Van-Damme Ostapovicz K, Chadzopulu A et al. Analysis of quality of life of women in menopause period in Poland, Greece, Belarus and Belgium using MRS Scale. Advances in Medical Sciences 2010;55(2):191-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Moravcová M, Mareš J, Ježek S. Menopause Rating Scale - validation czech version specific instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. Ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence 2014;5(1):36-45.
  14. Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research. Menopause Rating Scale; 2008. [online]. [cit. 2016-10-13]. Dostupné z: < http://www.menopause-rating-scale.info>
  15. Dinger J, Heinemann LA (2004). Menopause Rating Scale as outcome measure for hormone treatment; 2004. [online] [cit. 2015-03-04]. Dostupné z: http://www.menopause-rating-scale.info/documents/poster.pdf Go to original source...
  16. Dinger J, Zimmermann T, Heinemann LAJ, Stoehr D. Quality of life and hormone use: new validation results of MRS scale. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2006;4:32. Doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...