Kontakt 2018, 20(1):e3-e10 | DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.09.003

Validating the clinical learning environment and supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES + T scale) in SlovakiaNursing - Original article

Elena Gurkováa,*, Katarína ®iakováb, Gabriela Vörösovác, Helena Kadučákovád, Andrea Botíkováe
a University of Preąov, Faculty of Health Care, Department of Nursing, Preąov, Slovak Republic
b Comenius University in Bratislava, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Martin, Slovak Republic
c Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Faculty of Social Sciences and Health Care, Department of Nursing, Nitra, Slovak Republic
d Catholic University in Ruľomberok, Faculty of Health Care, Ruľomberok, Slovak Republic
e Trnava University, Faculty of Health Care and Social Work, Department of Nursing, Trnava, Slovak Republic

Aim: The application of reliable and valid tools may be helpful to evaluate the effectiveness of the clinical learning environment in nurse education and to enhance international comparison of clinical learning between European countries. The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties (internal consistency and construct validity) of the Slovak version of the Clinical Learning Environment + Teacher (CLES + T) evaluation scale, and to evaluate its usefulness in the context of clinical learning.

Design: A cross-sectional validation study.

Methods: The sample included 503 students from six Slovak universities. The structure of the instrument was computed with principal component analysis. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to measure the internal reliability of the CLES + T scale.

Results: The factor structure of the Slovak version of the CLES + T scale was in line with the original study and other studies in Western European countries. The internal consistency of the Cronbach's alpha values of five subscales of the CLES + T scale was high.

Conclusion: The Slovak version of the CLES + T is a valid and reliable tool that can be useful to assess students' evaluation of the clinical learning environment as well as the impact of clinical supervision methods on the domains of the learning environment.

Keywords: Nursing student; Clinical learning environment; Instrument psychometric analysis; Validation; Reliability; Factor structure

Received: June 9, 2017; Revised: August 21, 2017; Accepted: September 18, 2017; Published: March 26, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gurková E, ®iaková K, Vörösová G, Kadučáková H, Botíková A. Validating the clinical learning environment and supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES + T scale) in Slovakia. Kontakt. 2018;20(1):e3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.09.003.
Download citation

References

  1. Warne T, Johansson UB, Papastavrou E, Tichelaar E, Tomietto M, Van den Bossche K, et al. An exploration of the clinical learning experience of nursing students in nine European countries. Nurse Education Today 2010;30(8):809-15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Spitzer A, Perrenoud B. Reforms in nursing education across Western Europe: from agenda to practice. Journal of Professional Nursing 2006;22(3):150-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Spitzer A, Perrenoud B. Reforms in nursing education across Western Europe: implementation process and current status. Journal of Professional Nursing 2006;22(3):162-71. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Saarikoski M, Kaila P, Lambrinou E, Pérez Cañaveras RM, Tichelaar E, Tomietto M, Warne T. Students' experiences of cooperation with nurse teacher during their clinical placements: an empirical study in a Western European context. Nurse Education in Practice 2013;13(2):78-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Saarikoski M, Marrow C, Abreu W, Riklikiene O, Ozbicakçi S. Student nurses' experience of supervision and mentorship in clinical practice: a cross-cultural perspective. Nursing Education in Practice 2007;7(6):407-15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Antohe I, Riklikiene O, Tichelaar E, Saarikoski M. Clinical education and training of student nurses in four moderately new European Union countries: assessment of students' satisfaction with the learning environment. Nurse Education in Practice 2016;17(2):139-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Sirkka A, Olli S, Kanerva AM. Clinical placement audit as quality assurance measure in nursing education. In: Mikąová Z (Eds). Profesionalita v oąetřovatelství II. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Olomouc; 2015, pp. 110-17.
  8. Dunn SV, Hansford B. Undergraduate nursing student' perceptions of their clinical learning environment. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997;25(6):1299-306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Chan D. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in assessing hospital learning environments. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2001;38(4):447-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Saarikoski M, Leino-Kilpi H. The clinical learning environment and supervision by staff nurses: developing the instrument. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2002;39(3):259-67. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Saarikoski M, Isoaho H, Warne T, Leino-Kilpi H. The Nurse Teacher in clinical practice: developing the new sub-dimension to Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision (CLES) scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2008;45(8):1233-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Henderson A, Cooke M, Creedy DK, Walker R. Nursing students' perceptions of learning in practice environments: A review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2012;32(3):299-302. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Bergjan M, Hertel F. Evaluating students' perception of their clinical placements - testing the clinical learning environment and supervision and nurse teacher scale (CLES + T scale) in Germany. Nurse Education Today 2013;33(11):1393-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Bjørk IT, Berntsen K, Brynildsen G, Hestetun M. Nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment in placements outside traditional hospital settings. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2014;23(19-20):2958-67. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Carlson E, Idvall E. Nursing students' experiences of the clinical learning environment in nursing homes: a questionnaire study using the CLES + T evaluation scale. Nurse Education Today 2014;34(7):1130-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Johansson UB, Kaila P, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Leksell J, Isoaho H, Saarikoski M. Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher evaluation scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2010;66(9):2085-93. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Henriksen N, Normann HK, Skaalvik MW. Development and testing of the Norwegian version of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher (CLES + T) evaluation scale. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 2012;9(1). Doi 10.1515/1548-923X.2239. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Bos E, Alinaghizadeh-Mollasaraie F, Saarikoski M, Kaila P. Validation the 'clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher' CLES + T instrument in primary health care settings using confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2012;21(11-12):1785-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Vizcaya-Moreno MF, Pérez-Cañaveras RM, De Juan J, Saarikoski M. Development and psychometric testing of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher evaluation scale (CLES + T): The Spanish version. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2015;52(1):361-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Papastavrou E, Dimitriadou M, Tsangari H. Psychometric testing of the Greek version of the Clinical Learning Environment-Teacher (CLES + T). Global Journal of Health Science 2016;8(5). Doi:10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. ®iaková K. Achieving proficiency in clinical practice - satisfaction of nursing students and nurses with mentorship. In: Lepieąová M, Čáp J (Eds). Contemporary issues of nursing education and practice. Stavanger University, Stavanger; 2010, pp. 74-80.
  22. Zanovitová M, Lepieąová M, Kurucová R, ®iaková K, Farský I. Hodnotenie výučby a supervízie v klinickej oąetrovateµskej praxi. In: Bóriková I, Farský I, ®iaková K (Eds). Teória, výskum a vzdelávanie v oąetrovateµstve. Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Jesseniova lekárska fakulta v Martine; 2014, pp. 343-53.
  23. Gurková E, ®iaková K, Cibríková S, Magurová D, Hudáková A, Mrosková S. Factors influencing the effectiveness of clinical learning environment in nursing education. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery 2016;7(3):470-5. Go to original source...
  24. Saarikoski M, Warne T, Kaila P, Leino-Kilpi H. The role of the nurse teacher in clinical practice: an empirical study of Finnish student nurse experiences. Nurse Education Today 2009;29(6):595-600. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Tomietto M, Comparcini D, Saarikoski M, Simonetti V, Cicolini G. Multilevel perspectives in clinical learning environments' assessment: An insight on levels involved in planning nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 2014;4(12):42-50. Go to original source...