Kontakt 2019, 21(2):189-196 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2019.020

The impact of the emotions that frame mothers' decision-making about the vaccination of toddlersSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Lucia Ludvigh Cintulová *
St. Elisabeth University of Health and Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Science Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Introduction: Anti-vaccination campaigns have been broadened with a strong negative impact on the parental refusal of vaccination despite of the fact that fatal diseases had been greatly reduced thanks to mandatory vaccination programmes valid in Slovakia.

Methods: We used the questionnaire implemented by the Slovak public health institution to collect meaningful data, analysing the attitudes of 875 mothers of two-years old kids towards vaccination and the impacts of their emotional beliefs on decision-making.

Results: The results showed the correlation between attitudes to vaccination and variables such as age (p = 0.136), parenting (p = 0.037), regional district (p = 0.326), emotional backgrounds (p = 0.043) and life experiences (p = 0.015). The emotions have a significant impact on decision-making about vaccination in the first step and on the rational conclusion to get a child vaccinated (p = 0.025).

Discussion: In the sample of 875 women, the refusal of vaccination was found to reflect multiple factors, including family background, perceptions about healthy lifestyle and aspects of the natural immune system of children, awareness of risks of the diseases; perceived disadvantages of vaccines; its adverse effects compared to the efficacy, and negative experience with vaccination in the family or social environment in relation to the emotional effects.

Conclusions: Most of the parents call for non-mandatory vaccination and they are convinced that vaccination should be at everyone's free choice. On the other hand it can bring great chaos to the vaccination system, break preventive strategies and collective immunity, and may spread many old and new serious diseases into the population.

Keywords: Decision-making process; Emotionality; Frame effects; Toddlers; Vaccination

Received: June 21, 2018; Accepted: January 6, 2019; Prepublished online: April 15, 2019; Published: June 17, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cintulová LL. The impact of the emotions that frame mothers' decision-making about the vaccination of toddlers. Kontakt. 2019;21(2):189-196. doi: 10.32725/kont.2019.020.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abhyankar P, O'Connor DB, Lawton R (2008). The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychol Health Med 13(1): 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/13548500701235732. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Bellaby P (2003). Communication and miscommunication of risk: Understanding UK parents' attitudes to combined MMR vaccination. BMJ 327(7417): 725-728. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.725. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Benin AL, Wisler-Scher DJ, Colson E, Shapiro EU, Holmboe ES (2006). Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust. Pediatrics 117(5): 115-117. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1728. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Betsch C, Wicker S (2012). E-health use, vaccination knowledge and perception of own risk: drivers of vaccination uptake in medical students. Vaccine 30(6): 1143-1148. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.021. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Betsch C, Ulshöfer C, Renkewitz F, Betsch T (2011). The influence of narrative v. statistical information on perceiving vaccination risks. Med Decis Making 31(5): 742-753. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X11400419. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 313(5787): 684-687. DOI: 10.1126/science.1128356. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Ferguson E, Bibby PA, Leaviss J, Weyman A (2003). Effective design of workplace risk communications. Norwich: Health and Safety Executive.
    8. Gerend MA, Shepherd JE (2007). Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychol 26(6): 745-752. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.745. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Hatoková M, Bašnáková J (2017). Komunikácia pediatrov s rodičmi o téme očkovania - zmeny, potreby a stratégie. Pediatr Prax 18(6): 234-238.
    10. Hertwig R, Hoffrage U, ABC Research Group (2013). Simple Heuristics in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    11. Hilton S, Petticrew M, Hunt K (2006). Combined vaccines are like a sudden onslaught to the body's immune system: parental concerns about vaccine 'overload' and 'immunevulnerability'. Vaccine 24(20): 4321-4327. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Jacobson RM, Van Etta L, Bahta L (2013). The C.A.S.E. approach: guidance for talking to vaccine-hesitant parents. Minn Med 96(4): 49-50.
    13. Kang Y, Cappella J, Fishbein M (2006). The attentional mechanism of message sensation value: Interaction between message sensation value and argument quality on message effectiveness. Commun Monogr 73(4): 351-378. DOI: 10.1080/03637750601024164. Go to original source...
    14. Ma J, Stahl L (2017). A multimodal critical discourse analysis of anti-vaccination information on Facebook. Libr Inform Sci Res 39(4): 303-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2017.11.005. Go to original source...
    15. Marsh HA, Malik F, Shapiro E, Omer SB, Frew PM (2013). Message framing strategies to increase influenza immunization uptake among pregnant African American women. Matern Child Health J 18(7): 1639-1647. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-013-1404-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Masaryk R, Hatoková M (2017). Qualitative inquiry into reasons why vaccination messages fail. J Health Psychol 22(14): 1880-1888. DOI: 10.1177/1359105316656770. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Mitra T, Counts J, Pennebaker JW (2016). Understanding anti-vaccination attitudes in social media. Proceedings of the annual international AAAI conference on web and social media 2016. AAAI Press, pp. 269-278. Go to original source...
    18. Nyhan B, Reifler J, Richey S, Freed GL (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics. 133(4): e835-e842. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-2365. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Smith PJ, Chu SY, Barker LE (2004). Children who have received no vaccines: who are they and where do they live? Pediatrics 114(1): 187-195. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Whelan AM (2016). Lowering the age of consent: Pushing back against the anti-vaccine movement. J Law Med Ethics 44(3): 462-473. DOI: 10.1177/1073110516667942. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content