Kontakt 2020, 22(4):278-284 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2020.034

Preferences and influence of the value of health in the contemporary Czech populationSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Jiří Pospíšil *, Helena Pospíšilová, Ludmila Siarda Trochtová
Palacký University in Olomouc, Sts. Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology, Department of Christian Education, Olomouc, Czech Republic

This paper presents the research results concerning the preferences of the value of health and whether these preferences are dependent on several social factors: gender, age, population size of the village/town/city the respondents come from, qualification level, occupation and professional orientation, family economic situation, attitudes to the public social care policy, faith in God and attitude towards religion. Research was conducted throughout the entire country using 5,425 respondents, who were asked to fill in a questionnaire. Except for one factor - attitude to the public social care policy - all of the other factors have been recognized as significantly influencing the attitude to the value of health. The results of the research have two main impacts: firstly, they support the values theory according to which we can assume the key role of values in human activity and, secondly, they could have a serious influence on today's healthcare and social care practices, because they influence the motivation of clients and consequently could support or not support the healing process.

Keywords: Attitude to health; Research; Social factors; The value of health; Values

Received: March 15, 2020; Revised: July 20, 2020; Accepted: August 31, 2020; Prepublished online: September 7, 2020; Published: December 15, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pospíšil J, Pospíšilová H, Trochtová LS. Preferences and influence of the value of health in the contemporary Czech population. Kontakt. 2020;22(4):278-284. doi: 10.32725/kont.2020.034.
Download citation

References

  1. Brown GC, Brown MM, Sharma S (2003). Value-based medicine: evidence-based medicine and beyond. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 11(3): 157-170. DOI: 10.1076/ocii.11.3.157.17355. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Brown MM, Brown GC, Sharma S (2005). Evidence-Based to Value-Based Medicine. Chicago: AMA Press, 339 p.
  3. Busbee BG, Brown GC, Brown MM (2004). Value-based medicine: a new paradigm to evaluate treatments for vitreoretinal diseases and other medical interventions. Int Ophthalmol Clin 44(4): 155-172. DOI: 10.1097/00004397-200404440-00012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Colby A, Beaumont E, Ehrlich T, Corngold J (2010). Educating for democracy: Preparing Undergraduates for Responsible Political Engagement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Collins GP (2018). The atheist problem of disease: Who's to blame? Theology 121(2): 92-95. DOI: 10.1177/0040571x17740524. Go to original source...
  6. Czech Statistical Office (CZSO) (2011). Obyvatelstvo podle velikostních skupin obcí a podle hlavních charakteristik. [online] [cit. 2020-08-20]. Available at: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/24358877/240001302.pdf/
  7. Dobewall H, Tormos R, Vauclair C-M (2017). Normative Value Change Across the Human Life Cycle: Similarities and Differences Across Europe. J Adult Dev 24(4): 263-276. DOI: 10.1007/s10804-017-9264-y. Go to original source...
  8. Gavrilović Jovanović B, Gligorić M (2018). Fundamental drivers of prosperity in the European Union and Western Balkans countries. Industry/Industrija 46(1): 155-171. DOI: 10.5937/industrija46-16696. ISSN 03500373. Go to original source...
  9. Halligan A (2008). The importance of values in healthcare. J R Soc Med 101(10): 480-481. DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.08k019. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Hammer CB (2018). Mutuality, Integration, and Collaboration: A Spiritual Awakening for the Twenty-First Century. International Congregational Journal 17(1): 91-101.
  11. Heckhausen J, Wrosch C, Schulz R (2010). A Motivational Theory of Life-Span Development. Psychol Rev 117(1): 32. DOI: 10.1037/a0017668. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Hills MD (2002) Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's Values Orientation Theory. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 4(4). DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1040. Go to original source...
  13. Johansson E, Böckerman P, Lundqvist A (2020). Self-reported health versus biomarkers: does unemployment lead to worse health? Public Health 179: 127-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.10.005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kluckhohn C (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In: Parsons T, Shils E (Eds). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  15. Kluckhohn FR, Strodtbeck FL (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
  16. Lelkes O (2006). Tasting freedom: Happiness, religion and economic transition. J Econ Behav Organ 59(2): 173-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.016. Go to original source...
  17. Mangin D, Stephen G, Bismah V, Risdon C (2016). Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity. BMJ Open 6: 1-9. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010903. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Maskileyson D (2014). Healthcare system and the wealth-health gradient: A comparative study of older populations in six countries. Soc Sci Med 119: 18-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.013. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Marzoratti C, Pravettoni G (2017). Value as the key concept in the health care system: how it has influenced medical practice and clinical decision-making processes. J Multidiscip Healthc 10: 101-106. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S122383. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Nicholson A, Rose R, Bobak M (2010). Associations between different dimensions of religious involvement and self-rated health in diverse European populations. Health Psychol 29(2): 227-235. DOI: 10.1037/a0018036. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Palmer Kelly E, Hyer M, Payne N, Pawlik TM (2019). A mixed-methods approach to understanding the role of religion and spirituality in healthcare provider well-being. Psychol Relig Spiritual [in print]. DOI: 10.1037/rel0000297. Go to original source...
  22. Rider AR, Kurtz S, Slade D, Esterbrook Longmaid III H, Ho M-J, Kwok-hung Pun J, et al. (2014). The International Charter for Human Values in Healthcare: An interprofessional global collaboration to enhance values and communication in healthcare. Patient Educ Couns 96(3): 273-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.017. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Rokeach M (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: a theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  24. Rokeach M (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
  25. Schwartz SH (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna MP (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology 25: 1-65. Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6. Go to original source...
  26. Schwartz SH, Bilsky W (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. J Person Soc Psychol 53(3): 550-562. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550. Go to original source...
  27. Sheskin DJ (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  28. Soria KM, Mitchell TD (2016). Civic engagement and community service at research universities: engaging undergraduates for social justice, social change and responsible citizenship. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  29. Vido R (2019). Jak (ne)vysvětlit českou bezbožnost? Analytická sociologie jako inspirace pro sociologii náboženství. Sociológia 51(4): 420-443. DOI: 10.31577/sociologia.2019.51.4.19. Go to original source...
  30. Vilar R, Liu JH, Gouveila VV (2020). Age and gender differences in human values: A 20-nation study. Psychol Aging 35(3): 345-356. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000448. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Wieten S (2015). What the patient wants: an investigation of the methods of ascertaining patient values in evidence-based medicine and values-based practice. J Eval Clin Pract 24(1): 8-12. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12471. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.