Kontakt 2021, 23(1):33-39 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2021.003

Questionnaire survey: The process of quality management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory examination in the department of joint laboratoriesNursing - Original article

Iveta Slabíková1, Lada Nováková2, Lada Cetlová2, Vlasta Dvořáková2, Andrea Pokorná2,3, *
1 Hospital of Havlíčkův Brod, Havlíčkův Brod, Czech Republic
2 College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Jihlava, Czech Republic
3 Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Brno, Czech Republic

Introduction: Preparation of a patient for an examination and taking samples of biological material belong to critical factors of the laboratory preanalytical phase's quality. Taking of venous blood is one of the most common nursing care interventions.

Methods: A questionnaire survey using a content validated questionnaire from the laboratory of clinical biochemistry of University hospital in Umeå in Sweden has been carried out. Data analysis was performed using the Statistics 12 program at a significance level of 0.05.

Aim: The main aim was to evaluate a selected group of general nurses' awareness about the correct procedures for collecting venous blood in two accredited inpatient health care providers.

Results: One-hundred-and-fifty-three general nurses from two health care facilities took part in the study (hospital A: n = 71, hospital B: n = 82). The answers of the general nurses from both monitored facilities were almost identical, but not always correct. There was a statistically insignificant difference (p < 0.05) in the knowledge of general nurses in the procedure of venous blood collection. Still, there was a statistically significant difference in the declared labeling of tubes before collecting or in the collection of several different tubes at once (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The identified inconsistencies in the procedures during blood taking conform to previous foreign studies. The need for close collaboration with clinical laboratory personnel and the requirement of control in the preanalytical phase concerning taking samples of biological material is essential to ensure better quality care.

Keywords: General nurse; Health care risk; Patient safety; Preanalytical phase; Venous blood collection

Received: September 8, 2020; Revised: January 21, 2021; Accepted: January 22, 2021; Prepublished online: February 4, 2021; Published: March 3, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Slabíková I, Nováková L, Cetlová L, Dvořáková V, Pokorná A. Questionnaire survey: The process of quality management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory examination in the department of joint laboratories. Kontakt. 2021;23(1):33-39. doi: 10.32725/kont.2021.003.
Download citation

References

  1. Benčíková M (2012). Audit kvality odběrů biologického materiálu v domově pro seniory. FONS. Pardubice: STAPRO, s. r. o. 27(4): 19.
  2. Bölenius K, Brulin C, Graneheim UH (2014). Personnel's experiences of phlebotomy practices after participating in an educational intervention programme. Nurs Res Pract 2014: 538704. DOI: 10.1155/2014/538704. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bölenius K, Brulin CH, Grankvist K, Lindkvist M, Söderberg J (2012). A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices. BMC Res Notes 5: 39. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-39 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bölenius K, Lindkvist M, Brulin CH, Grankvist K, Nilsson K, Söderberg J (2013). Impact of a large-scale educational intervention program on venous blood specimen collection practices. BMC Health Services Research 13: 463. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-463. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Fang L, Fang S-H, Chung Y-H, Chien S-T (2008). Collecting factors related to the haemolysis of blood specimens. J Clin Nurs 17: 2343-2351. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.02057.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Friedecký B (2010). Kvalita v klinické laboratoři a bezpečnost pacientů. Klin Biochem Metab 18(39): 136-143.
  7. Friedecký B (2018). Aktuální sdělení z oblasti preanalytické fáze. FONS. Pardubice: STAPRO, s. r. o. 28(3): 12.
  8. Grissinger M (2014). Oops, Sorry, Wrong Patient! A Patient Verification Process is Needed Everywhere, Not Just at the Bedside. P & T: a Peer-Reviewed Journal for Formulary Management 39(8): 535-537. Go to PubMed...
  9. Hawkins R (2012). Managing the pre-and post-analytical phases of the total testing process. Ann Lab Med 32(1): 5-16. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.1.5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Hrachovinová I, Mikulenková D (2017). Pořadí zkumavek při odběru krve. Doporučení laboratorní sekce České hematologické společnosti ČLS JEP. [online] [cit. 2020-06-07]. Available from: https://www.hematology.cz/doporuceni/laboratorni_sekce/files/obecna/Doporuceni_LS_CHS_CLS_JEP-Poradi_odberu_v01.pdf
  11. Jabor A (2008). Vnitřní prostředí. Praha: Grada Publishing, 560 p.
  12. Jabor A, Franeková J (2012). Několik poznámek k postanalytické fázi a bezpečnosti pacientů. FONS. Pardubice: STAPRO, s. r. o. 22(4): 18.
  13. Jabor A, Franeková J (2013). Principy interpretace laboratorních testů. Praha: Roche s.r.o., Diagnostics Division, 381 p.
  14. Kratochvíl J, Plzák Z, Peková A (2013). ČSN EN ISO 15189 - Zdravotnické laboratoře - Požadavky na kvalitu a způsobilost. Praha: Úřad pro technickou normalizaci, metrologii a státní zkušebnictví. [online] [cit. 2020-06-07]. Available from: https://library.upol.cz/arl-upol/cs/detail-upol_us_cat-0180194-cSN-EN-ISO-15189-Zdravotnicke-laboratore-Pozadavky-na-kvalitu-a-zpusobilost/?disprec=4&iset=1
  15. Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Gelati M, Volanski W, et al. (2013). Effects of vigorous mixing of blood vacuum tubes on laboratory test results. Clin Biochem 46(3): 250-254. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.10.033. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Loosová J, Malina P, Malinková M, Válek T, Vorlíčková H (2018). Pracovní postup preanalytické fáze laboratorního
  17. vyšetření krve. NCO NZO Brno. [online] [cit. 2020-06-07]. Available from: https://www.nconzo.cz/file/742a62c0527209d37ff15a36d4ac4665518f6b2c
  18. Marx D, Vlček F (2014). Akreditační standardy pro nemocnice. Praha: Spojená akreditační komise ČR, o.p.s., 168 p.
  19. Plebani M (2009). Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta 404: 16-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.022. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Podstatová R (2017). Hodnocení kvality a bezpečí lůžkové zdravotní péče. Česká společnost pro akreditaci s.r.o. [online] [cit. 2020-06-07]. Available from: http://www.csaz.cz/
  21. Lundberg GD (1990). Critical (panic) value notification: An established laboratory practice policy (parameter). JAMA 263(5): 709. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440050103044. Go to original source...
  22. dokumenty/Hodnotici_standardy_a_ukazatele_kvality_a_bezpeci-2017.pdf
  23. Willman B, Grankvist K, Bölenius K (2018). Evaluation of the clinical implementation of a large-scale online e-learning program on venous blood specimen collection guideline practices. Clin Chem Lab Med (CCLM) 56(11): 1870-1877 DOI: 10.1515/CCLM-2018-0051. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.