Kontakt 2021, 23(3):162-169 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2021.022

Utilization of ADL performance tests to predict expected functional status in patients after strokeSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Yvona Angerova1, *, Pavel Marsalek2, Anna Kratochvilova3, Irina Chmelova4, 5, Tereza Gueye1, Jan Briza6, Vladimir Rogalewicz1
1 Charles University, First faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Masaryk Hospital in Ústí nad Labem, Krajská zdravotní, a.s., Rehabilitation Department, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
3 Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biomedical Technology, Kladno, Czech Republic
4 University Hospital Ostrava, Clinic of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Ostrava, Czech Republic
5 University of Ostrava, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation, Czech Republic
6 General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

The main objective of this paper is the study of patient self-sufficiency functional tests in the early rehabilitation stage of stroke, and their further development in relation to the initial disability severity. Attention is paid to the identification of links between the first weeks of early rehabilitation therapy and the patients' state one year after their discharge from the early rehabilitation ward. There were 87 patients in early rehabilitation wards in three different parts of the Czech Republic. One year after their discharge, 29 of them were tested again. The FIM (Functional Independence Measure) values from the follow-up check statistically significantly correlate with the severity of patients' functional disability at the time of admission one year ago (at the significance level of 0.05), more severe patients improved more than less severe ones. The same applies if we look at the effect of the number of days between the first onset of stroke and the admission to the early rehabilitation ward (at the significance level of 0.05). The sooner the patients were admitted, the bigger the improvement they could achieve. Monitoring of changes in the functional state and the self-sufficiency progress in stroke patients is crucial for rehabilitation indication and the tracking of its outcomes. In the Czech Republic, unfortunately, we still tend to look for unified criteria for disability evaluation, and many patients must pass through the rehabilitation system without clear guidance.

Keywords: BI (Barthel Index); FIM (Functional Independence Measures); Neurorehabilitation; Patient outcome assessment; Stroke
Grants and funding:

The research leading to this paper was supported by the grant No. 410004194 provided by the General Health Insurance Company of the Czech Republic from their Secondary Prevention Fund.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Received: December 13, 2020; Revised: December 18, 2020; Accepted: April 9, 2021; Prepublished online: May 4, 2021; Published: September 3, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Angerova Y, Marsalek P, Kratochvilova A, Chmelova I, Gueye T, Briza J, Rogalewicz V. Utilization of ADL performance tests to predict expected functional status in patients after stroke. Kontakt. 2021;23(3):162-169. doi: 10.32725/kont.2021.022.
Download citation

References

  1. Angerova Y, Hralova M, Gueye T, Švestková O, Lippertova- -Grünerova M (2012). Influence of enriched environment and erythropoietin on cognitive function of rats after hypobaric hypoxia. Brain Inj 26(4-5): 472-473.
  2. Angerova Y, Marsalek P, Chmelova I, Gueye T, Uherek S, Briza J, et al. (2020). Cost and cost-effectiveness of early inpatient rehabilitation after stroke varies with initial disability: the Czech Republic perspective. Int J Rehabil Res 43(4): 376-382. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000440. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bernhardt J, Borschmann K, Boyd L, Thomas Carmichael S, Corbett D, Cramer SC, et al. (2016). Moving rehabilitation research forward: Developing consensus statements for rehabilitation and recovery research. Int J Stroke 11(4): 454-458. DOI: 10.1177/1747493016643851. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bernhardt J, English C, Johnson L, Cumming TB (2015). Early mobilization after stroke: early adoption but limited evidence. Stroke 46(4): 1141-1146. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007434. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Boyd LA, Hayward KS, Ward NS, Stinear CM, Rosso C, Fisher RJ, et al. (2017). Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31(10-11): 864-876. DOI: 10.1177/1545968317732680. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Branco JP, Oliveira S, Sargento-Freitas J, Laíns J, Pinheiro J (2019). Assessing functional recovery in the first six months after acute ischemic stroke: a prospective, observational study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 55(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05161-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Bruthans J (2019). Epidemiologie a prognóza cévních mozkových příhod v ČR. CMP Journal 2(1): 5-8.
  8. Chen H-F, Wu C-Y, Lin K-C, Chen C-L, Huang P-C, Hsieh C-J, Liu J-S (2013). Rasch validation of a combined measure of basic and extended daily life functioning after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27(2): 125-132. DOI: 10.1177/1545968312457828. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Chumney D, Nollinger K, Shesko K, Skop K, Spencer M, Newton RA (2010). Ability of Functional Independence Measure to accurately predict functional outcome of stroke-specific population: systematic review. J Rehabil Res Dev 47(1): 17-29. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.08.0140. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Granger CV, Markello SJ, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Reistetter TA, Ottenbacher KJ (2010). The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with traumatic brain injury discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2000-2007. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 89(4): 265-278. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181d3eb20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Hsueh I-P, Lin J-H, Jeng J-S, Hsieh C-L (2002). Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73(2): 188-190. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.73.2.188. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Katan M, Luft A (2018). Global Burden of Stroke. Semin Neurol 38(2): 208-211. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1649503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Krishnamurthi RV, Moran AE, Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Norrving B, Mensah GA, et al. (2015). Stroke Prevalence, Mortality and Disability-Adjusted Life Years in Adults Aged 20-64 Years in 1990-2013: Data from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology 45(3): 190-202. DOI: 10.1159/000441098. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kurokawa N, Kai C, Hokotachi Y, Hasegawa M, Amagai T (2018). Determination of the cut-off point of the Functional Independence Measure as a predictor of adverse events in patients with acute stroke. J Int Med Res 46(10): 4235-4245. DOI: 10.1177/0300060518792155. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J (2006). Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 37(9): 2348-2353. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000238594.91938.1e. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, English C, Ali M, Churilov L, et al. (2017). Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 12(5): 451-461. DOI: 10.1177/1747493017711813. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Langhorne P, Wu O, Rodgers H, Ashburn A, Bernhardt J (2017). A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial after stroke (AVERT): a Phase III, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 21(54): 1-120. DOI: 10.3310/hta21540. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Md State Med J 14: 61-65. Go to original source...
  19. Murphy TH, Corbett D (2009). Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 10(12): 861-872. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2735. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, Speizer A, Chong JY, Lazar RM, et al. (2008). Inter-individual variability in thecapacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22(1): 64-71. DOI: 10.1177/1545968307305302. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Saito J, Koyama T, Domen K (2018). Long-Term Outcomes of FIM Motor Items Predicted From Acute Stage NIHSS of Patients With Middle Cerebral Artery Infarct. Ann Rehabil Med 42(5): 670-681. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.670. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Stiborová A (2017). Funkční míra nezávislosti a míra hodnocení funkčního stavu FIM + FAM jako nástroj pro hodnocení funkčního stavu v neurorehabilitaci. Neurol praxi 18(5): 330-333. DOI: 10.36290/neu.2017.107. Go to original source...
  23. Strasser DC, Falconer JA, Stevens AB, Uomoto JM, Herrin J, Bowen SE, et al. (2008). Team training and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89(1): 10-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.127. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Švestková O, Angerová Y, Druga R (2017). Rehabilitace motoriky člověka [Human motor activity Rehabilitation]. Grada Publishing.
  25. Tur BS, Gursel YK, Yavuzer G, Kucukdeveci A, Arasil T (2003). Rehabilitation outcome of Turkish stroke patients: in a team approach setting. Int J Rehabil Res 26(4): 271-277. DOI: 10.1097/00004356-200312000-00004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. ÚZIS - Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic (2018). Barthelové test. [online] [cit. 2020-01-22]. Available from: https://www.uzis.cz/index.php?pg=registry-sber-dat--klasifikace--barthelove-test
  27. Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G (2014). What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(2): e87987. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. (2016). Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association / American Stroke Association. Stroke 47(6): e98-e169. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Winters C, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EEH, Nijland RHM, Veerbeek JM, Meskers CGM (2018). Moving stroke rehabilitation forward: The need to change research. NeuroRehabilitation 43(1): 19-30. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-172393. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Zeiler SR (2019). Should We Care About Early Post-Stroke Rehabilitation? Not Yet, but Soon. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 19(3): 13. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-019-0927. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.