Kontakt 2021, 23(3):170-177 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2021.023

Longitudinal study of postural and locomotor function development in clients with brain damageSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Markéta Bendová1, *, Martina Hartmanová1, Jitka Vacková1, Marcela Míková1, 2, Anna Kuželková1, 3
1 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
2 České Budějovice Hospital a. s., Department of Rehabilitation, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
3 Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, The First Faculty of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic

Background: Acquired brain injury (ABI) is a disease that causes severe disability. For this reason, we established an interprofessional rehabilitation team consisting of physicians, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and social workers operating in home settings - in an effort to minimize the consequences of long-term disability.

Objectives: Evaluate the development of postural and balance functions (over a 9-month period) in 17 clients with ABI undergoing individualized 3-month physiotherapy in the home setting.

Methods: Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were used to quantify the functional status of the clients. A total of 4 assessments were completed at the initial, 3 months, 6 months, and final 9-months examinations.

Results: According to BBS and TUG, 15 clients showed an improvement in their balance functions after the intervention; 2 clients were unable to complete the TUG, and 6 clients remained at risk of falling.

Conclusions: Our results showed a clear benefit of the physiotherapeutic intervention. However, 6 months after completion, one-third of the clients had worse results on the TUG; although 15 clients continued to improve according to the BBS. This indicates the higher sensitivity of the TUG test for evaluating balance functions, and that physiotherapeutic interventions should be prolonged, particularly in clients with a Functional Independence Measure instrument (FIM) of less than 6 points.

Keywords: Acquired brain injury; BBS; FIM; Risk of falls; Stability evaluation; TUG test
Grants and funding:

This work was supported by the University of South Bohemia Grant Agency under the Grant “Coordinated rehabilitation of patients with brain injury” (Reg. No. GAJU 138/2016/S).

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Received: December 9, 2020; Revised: April 5, 2021; Accepted: May 19, 2021; Prepublished online: May 19, 2021; Published: September 3, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bendová M, Hartmanová M, Vacková J, Míková M, Kuželková A. Longitudinal study of postural and locomotor function development in clients with brain damage. Kontakt. 2021;23(3):170-177. doi: 10.32725/kont.2021.023.
Download citation

References

  1. Algwiri AA, Whitney SL (2012). Balance and Falls. Geriatric Physical Therapy. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, 331-353. [online] [cit. 2020-01-22]. Available from: https://www.chirocredit.com/downloads/geriatricrehab/geriatricrehab110.pdf Go to original source...
  2. Ambler Z (2011). Základy neurologie: učebnice pro lékařské fakulty. 7th ed. Praha: Galén.
  3. Andersson AG, Kamwendo K, Seiger A, Appelros P (2006). How to identify potential fallers in a stroke unit: validity indexes of 4 test methods. J Rehabil Med 38(3): 186-191. DOI: 10.1080/16501970500478023. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Barry E, Galvin R, Keogh C, Horgan F, Fahey T (2014). Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 14: 14. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Guiton D (1989). Measuring Balance in the Elderly: Preliminary development of an Instrument. Physiother Can 41(6): 304-311. DOI: 10.3138/ptc.41.6.304. Go to original source...
  6. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B (1992). Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 83(Suppl. 2): S7-S11. Go to PubMed...
  7. Bizovská L, Janura M, Míková M, Svoboda Z (2017). Rovnováha a možnosti jejího hodnocení. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci. Go to original source...
  8. Bohannon RW (2006). Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther 29(2): 64-68. DOI: 10.1519/00139143-200608000-00004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Burget N (2015). Využití zpětné vazby v rehabilitaci pacientů s poruchami chůze po cévní mozkové příhodě. Rehabil Fyz Lék 22(2): 70-78.
  10. Carraro L (2002). Obnova pohybu po cévní mozkové příhodě. Praha: Rehalb o.p.s.
  11. Čeledová L, Čevela R (2011). Future of coordinated rehabilitation (complete, comprehensive). Prakt Lék 91(11): 653-656.
  12. Čeledová L, Čevela R. Kalita Z, Vaňásková E (2010). Posuzování zdravotního stavu a pracovní schopnosti osob po cévní mozkové příhodě - kazuistiky. Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie 73/106(6): 728-733.
  13. Dungl P (2005). Biomechanika chůze. In: Dungl P, et al. Ortopedie. Grada Publishing.
  14. Geraldo A, Dores AR, Coelho B, Ramião E, Castro-Caldas A, Barbosa F (2018). Efficacy of ICT-based neurocognitive rehabilitation programs for acquired brain injury: A systematic review on its assessment methods. Eur Psychol 23(3): 250-264. DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000319. Go to original source...
  15. Hlinovský D, Doležalová I, Hlinovská J (2016). Komplexní rehabilitace pacientů po cévní mozkové příhodě - projekt iktového centra Thomayerovy nemocnice. Prakt Lék 96(6): 267-271.
  16. IHIS CR - Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic (2018). Hospitalizovaní v nemocnicích ČR 2017. Zdravotnická statistika ČR. [online] [cit. 2020-01-22]. Available from: https://www.uzis.cz/index.php?pg=record&id=8100
  17. Kolář P, et al. (2012). Rehabilitace v klinické praxi. Praha: Galén.
  18. Kolář P, Máček M, et al. (2015). Základy klinické rehabilitace. Praha: Galén.
  19. Lippertová-Grünerová M (2015). Rehabilitace po náhlé cévní mozkové příhodě. Praha: Galén.
  20. Mayer M (2002). Paradoxy v neurokineziologii spastické chůze. Rehab Fyz Lék 7(2): 66-73.
  21. McIntyre A, Janzen S, Richardson M, Kwok C, Teasell R (2015). An Overview of Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Randomized Controlled Trials. J Head Trauma Rehabil 30(6): E47-53. DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000108. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Mikula J (2008). Rehabilitace po CMP. Kardiol Rev Int Med 10(2): 66-73.
  23. MoH - Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (2010). Péče o pacienty s cerebrovaskulárním onemocněním v České republice. 2: 2-10. [online] [cit. 2020-01-22]. Available from: https://www.cmp.cz/jnp/cz/pece_o_cmp_v_cr/cerebrovaskularni_pece_v_cr.html
  24. MoH - Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (2015). Seznam center vysoce specializované zdravotní péče o pacienty s iktem. 11: 55-56. [online] [cit. 2020-01-22]. Available from: https://www.cmp.cz/public/5f/f3/e9/4809_21789_ZDRAVOTNICTVI_11_15__1_.pdf
  25. Musilová E, Žiaková E, Letašiová D (2014). Fyzioterapie u pacientů po cévní mozkové příhodě. Rehab Fyz Lék 21(3): 136-140.
  26. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991). The Timed "Up & Go": a Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(2): 142-148. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Rehabilitation measures database (2010). The Rehabilitation Clinician's Place to Find the Best Instruments to Screen Patients and Monitor Their Progress. Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. [online] [cit. 2019-10-01]. Available from: http://www.rehabmeasures.org/ and from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/timed-and-go
  28. Son H, Park CH (2018). Effect of turning direction on Timed Up and Go test results in stroke patients. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 55(1): 35-39. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05202-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. The FIM Instrument: Its Background, Structure, and Usefulness (2014). Buffalo: UDS MR [online] [cit. 2018-09-11]. Available from: http://www.udsmr.org/Documents/The_FIM_Instrument_Background_Structure_and_UsUsefUsUs.pdf
  30. Vařeka I (2002). Posturální stabilita (I. část): Terminologie a biomechanické principy. Rehab Fyz Lék 9(4): 115-121.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.