Kontakt 2022, 24(3):254-262 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2022.024

The importance of mobility for the autonomy of seniorsSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Miroslav Joukl1, Lucie Vítková1, *, Zuzana Truhlářová2, Petra Marešová3, Lucie Orlíková4
1 University of Hradec Králové, Philosophical Faculty, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
2 University of Hradec Králové, Faculty of Education, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
3 University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
4 VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic

Spatial mobility of seniors is one of the current topics under investigation. Its relevance is due to both the ageing population and issues related to the quality of life of seniors. It is linked to how the spatial mobility of seniors affects their personal or family life, but also community and public life. The factors that promote spatial mobility and those that hinder it are the subject of contemporary research. Among the topics related to ageing and old age, the autonomy of seniors, which encompasses several aspects, is also under investigation. The intersection of these two topics, i.e., spatial mobility and autonomy, raises the questions of how these phenomena and processes are related, to what extent they condition each other and, as a result, what functions mobile autonomy, so conceived, fulfils or, conversely, under what circumstances it ceases to be functional. An analysis of 24 semi-structured interviews with seniors over 70 years of age was conducted. The main objective of the study was to discover what importance seniors attach to the outdoor mobility for their individual autonomy. We deconstructed this goal into the following research questions: (a) What importance do seniors attach to the outdoor mobility modes they use? (b) What circumstances do seniors identify as affecting their mobility? (c) How do seniors respond to the limitations in their outdoor mobility? In particular, the modus of the car has been shown to be important, but the importance is differentiated according to different criteria, e.g., whether the senior drives alone, whether his/her partner drives or whether s/he relies on the help of others. A big question is how drivers cope when they stop driving or are forced to stop. The importance of the bicycle, usually linked to the wider radius of the elderly person's daily living space, depends on health, fitness, and lifestyle. From the interviews, it is evident that the situation of seniors and their coping strategies, especially in the case of advanced old age, are well characterized by their ability and commitment to walking. The analysis of the interviews leads to a typology of seniors' attitudes towards mobility and its importance for their own autonomy.

Keywords: Aging of seniors; Autonomy; Mobility modes; Outdoor mobility; Seniors
Grants and funding:

The project was supported by project GAČR 21-22276s Modelling of accessibility for seniors, perception of accessibility and determinants of their spatial mobility, solved by VŠB-TU Ostrava, UHK.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Received: January 21, 2022; Revised: July 29, 2022; Accepted: August 24, 2022; Prepublished online: September 21, 2022; Published: October 5, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Joukl M, Vítková L, Truhlářová Z, Marešová P, Orlíková L. The importance of mobility for the autonomy of seniors. Kontakt. 2022;24(3):254-262. doi: 10.32725/kont.2022.024.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Brabcová I, Vacková J (2013). Koncepce deseti sociálních determinant zdraví. Kontakt 15(4): 406-412. DOI: 10.32725/kont.2013.048. Go to original source...
    2. Burlando C, Ivaldi E, Ciacci A (2021). Seniors' Mobility and Perceptions in Different Urban Neighbourhoods: A Non-Aggregative Approach. Sustainability 13(12): 6647. DOI: 10.3390/su13126647. Go to original source...
    3. Čepelka O (2021). Aktivity seniorů ve třetím věku. In: Stárnutí 2021, Sborník příspěvků 5. gerontologické mezioborové konference Praha, 11.-12. února 2021, Praha: Pražská vysoká škola psychosociálních studií, pp. 17-30.
    4. Corazza ST, Vacková J, Costa DL (2019). Analýza kvality života starších dospělých v České republice a Brazílii - systematický přehled. Revista Kairós-Gerontologia 22(4): 161-188.
    5. Crews DE (2022). Aging, frailty, and design of built environments. J Physiol Anthropol 41(1): 2. DOI: 10.1186/s40101-021-00274-w. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Fjordside S, Morville A (2016). Factors influencing older people's experiences of participation in autonomous decisions concerning their daily care in their own homes: A review of the literature. Int J Older People Nurs 11(4): 284-297. DOI: 10.1111/opn.12116. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Hamplová D, et al. (2014). Rodina a zdraví - jejich vzájemné souvislosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), 147 p.
    8. Haustein S, Siren A (2014). Seniors' unmet mobility needs-how important is a driving licence? J Transp Geogr 41: 45-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.001. Go to original source...
    9. Hendl J (2012). Kvalitativní výzkum: základní teorie, metody a aplikace, Praha: Portál, 407 p.
    10. Johnson J, Rodriguez MA, Al Snih S (2020). Life-space mobility in the elderly: current perspectives. Clin Interv Aging 15: 1665-1674. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S196944. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Kahana E, Kelley-Moore J, Kahana B (2012). Proactive aging: A longitudinal study of stress, resources, agency, and well-being in late life. Aging Ment Health 16(4): 438-451. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2011.644519. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Kaufmann J-C (2010). Chápající rozhovor. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), 151 p.
    13. Khalek FA, Marechal L, Barthod C, Benoit E, Perrin S, Godiard B (2021). Toward a person-centred, multidisciplinary method to assess the vulnerability of the elderly. In: JetSan. Toulouse. HAL Id: hal-03245959.
    14. Koutná Kostínková J, Čermák I (2013). Interpretativní fenomenologická analýza. In: Řiháček T, Čermák I, Hytych R. Kvalitativní analýza textů: čtyři přístupy. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 9-43.
    15. Levasseur M, Naud D (2022). The Application of Salutogenesis for Social Support and Participation: Toward Fostering Active and Engaged Aging at Home. The Handbook of Salutogenesis. Springer, Cham, pp. 249-258. Go to original source...
    16. Matsui M, Capezuti E (2008). Perceived autonomy and self-care resources among senior center users. Geriatr Nurs 29(2): 141-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2007.09.001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Mišovič J (2019). Kvalitativní výzkum se zaměřením na polostrukturovaný rozhovor. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), 292 p.
    18. Novotná H, Špaček O, Šťovíčková Jantulová M (2019). Metody výzkumu ve společenských vědách. Praha: Fakulta humanitních studií Univerzity Karlovy, 496 p.
    19. Petrová Kafková M (2013). Užívání prostoru a venkovní mobilita městských seniorů. Fórum sociální politiky 7(3): 19-23.
    20. Petrová Kafková M, Sedláková T (2017). Čtvrtý věk jako specifické pole pro vyjádření aktérství. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 53 (5): 719-735. DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2017.53.5.362. Go to original source...
    21. Smith GC, Sylvestre GM (2001). Determinants of the travel behavior of the suburban elderly. Growth and Change 32(3): 395-412. DOI: 10.1111/0017-4815.00165. Go to original source...
    22. Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications, 240 p.
    23. Stachoň M (2015). Diskurz, kritika a medziľudská komunikácia In: Okrasa M, Maliszewski WJ, Fiedor M (Eds): Komunikowanie sie w środowisku szkolnym i pozaszkolnym: nowe trendy i obszary, Toruń. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, pp. 13-29.
    24. Strauss AL (2003). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511557842. Go to original source...
    25. Su R, Xiao J, McBride EC, Goulias KG (2021). Understanding senior's daily mobility patterns in California using human mobility motifs. J Transp Geogr 94: 103117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103117. Go to original source...
    26. Sudré MRS, Reiners AAO, Azevedo RDS, Floriano LA (2015). Socioeconomic and health conditions of the elderly assisted by Family Health Teams. Cienc Cuid Saúde 14(1): 933-940. DOI: 10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v14i1.19794. Go to original source...
    27. Sýkorová D (2007). Autonomie ve stáří. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), 285 p.
    28. Truhlářová Z, Vosečková A (2013). Autonomie z pohledu seniorů. Aktuální otázky sociální politiky - teorie a praxe 7(1): 97-110.
    29. Truhlářová Z, Vosečková A, Janebová R (2016). Importance of Subjective Health for the perception of seniors autonomy. In: 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2016, pp. 589-596.
    30. Vidovićová L (2018). Vybrané rozdíly v kvalitě života českých seniorů ve městě a na venkově. Fórum sociální politiky 12(3): 2-8.
    31. Zacher H, Kooij DTAM (2017). Aging and proactivity. In: Parker S, Bindl U (Eds). Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations. London: Routledge, pp. 258-294.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content