Kontakt 2023, 25(4):328-338 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2023.038

Revealing the unseen: a bibliometric analysis of workplace safetySocial Sciences in Health - Review article

Khairul Hafezad Abdullah1, *, Mohd Firdaus Roslan2, Noor Syazwani Ishak3, Noor Syamimi Ishak4, Mohamad Afifi Yahya5, Haniff Riza Abdul Hadi6, Mohamad Shahrul Nizam Mohd Rosaai7
1 Universiti Utara Malaysia, UUM College of Business, School of Business Management, Social Security Management Center of Excellence, 06010 Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
2 Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Faculty of Management and Economics, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
3 Sunway College, General Studies Department, Selangor, Malaysia
4 University of Malaya, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
5 Universiti Teknologi MARA, Arshad Ayub Graduate Business School, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
6 Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Pantai Premier Pathology Laboratory, 59100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
7 Universiti Malaya, Faculty of Science, Science and Technology School, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Ensuring workplace safety is paramount for organisations operating in the health or industrial sectors, as it mitigates the risk of accidents, injuries, and illnesses that may arise during job-related activities. This study employs bibliometric methods to analyse and evaluate published literature on workplace safety, identifying major themes, authors, and publications in the field and assessing the impact and influence of research in this area. The investigation obtains datasets from Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). The ScientoPy and VOSviewer software were utilised to analyse the datasets. The findings indicate a steady rise in the literature on workplace safety since the 1970s. In 2019, a notable quantity of publications amounting to 537 across both databases was documented. The subject of "Public, Environmental & Occupational Health" has achieved the highest ranking with 1,669 publications. The top five author keywords associated with this subject are "occupational health and safety", "health and safety", "safety", "occupational safety", and "occupational health". The term "COVID-19" has garnered significant attention recently, particularly in 2021 and 2022. The bibliometric analysis indicates that workplace safety research has been a consistent and growing topic of scholarly interest. The findings can guide future research undertakings, decision-making processes in policy formulation, and practical measures aimed at augmenting occupational safety and preserving workers' well-being and general welfare.

Keywords: Bibliometric; COVID-19; Occupational health and safety; Workplace safety
Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Received: April 15, 2023; Revised: September 29, 2023; Accepted: October 31, 2023; Prepublished online: November 1, 2023; Published: December 18, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Abdullah KH, Firdaus Roslan M, Ishak NS, Ishak NS, Afifi Yahya M, Hadi HRA, Nizam Mohd Rosaai MS. Revealing the unseen: a bibliometric analysis of workplace safety. Kontakt. 2023;25(4):328-338. doi: 10.32725/kont.2023.038.
Download citation

References

  1. Abdrakhmanov N, Fedosov A, Kilinbaeva I, Ismagilov M, Savicheva Y (2022). Analysis of the relationship between the sustainable environmental health and occupational safety: problems, prospects and opportunities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, pp. 1-7. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/981/3/032046. Go to original source...
  2. Abdullah KH (2022). Bibliometric analysis of safety behaviour research. Asian J Behav Sci 4(2): 19-33. DOI: 10.55057/ajbs.2022.4.2.2. Go to original source...
  3. Abdullah KH, Abd Aziz FS (2020). Safety behaviour in the laboratory among chemical engineering students: An SOR paradigm. TEST Eng Manag 83: 22330-22346.
  4. Abdullah KH, Sofyan D (2023). Machine learning in safety and health research: a scientometric analysis. Int J Inf Sci Manag 21(1): 17-35. DOI: 10.22034/ijism.2022.1977763.0. Go to original source...
  5. Abdullah KH, Hashim MN, Abd Aziz FS (2020). A 39 years (1980-2019) bibliometric analysis of safety leadership research. TEST Eng Manag 83: 4526-4542.
  6. Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Tatagari S, Esteves SC, Harlev A, Henkel R, et al. (2016). Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J Androl 18(2): 296-309. DOI: 10.4103%2F1008-682X.171582. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Anastasi S, Madonna M, Monica L (2021). Implications of embedded artificial intelligence-machine learning on safety of machinery. Procedia Comput Sci 180: 338-343. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.171. Go to original source...
  8. Andersen LP, Nørdam L, Joensson T, Kines P, Nielsen KJ (2018). Social identity, safety climate and self-reported accidents among construction workers. Constr Manag Econ 36(1): 22-31. DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2017.1339360. Go to original source...
  9. Applebaum KM, Asfaw A, O'Leary PK, Busey A, Tripodis Y, Boden LI (2019). Suicide and drug-related mortality following occupational injury. Am J Ind Med 62(9): 733-741. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23021. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Auffan M, Rose J, Bottero JY, Lowry GV, Jolivet JP, Wiesner MR (2009). Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from anenvironmental, health and safety perspective. Nat Nanotechnol 4(10): 634-641. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2009.242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Awais-E-Yazdan M, Hassan Z, Ejaz A, Spulbar C, Birau R, Mitu NE (2022). Investigating the nexus between safety training, safety rules and procedures, safety performance and protection against hazards in Pakistani construction companies considering its impact on textile industry. Ind Textila 73(1): 48-53. DOI: 10.35530/IT.073.01.202154. Go to original source...
  12. Baby T, Madhu G, Renjith VR (2021). Occupational electrical accidents: Assessing the role of personal and safety climate factors. Saf Sci 139: 105229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105229. Go to original source...
  13. Barling J, Loughlin C, Kelloway EK (2002). Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol 87(3): 488-496. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.488. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Burke MJ, Signal SM (2010). Workplace safety: A multilevel, interdisciplinary perspective. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 1-47. DOI: 10.1108/S0742-7301(2010)0000029003. Go to original source...
  15. Chandler RK, Fletcher BW, Volkow ND (2009). Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety. JAMA 301(2): 183-190. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2008.976. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ (2009). Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol 94(5): 1103-1127. DOI: 10.1037/a0016172. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Christie T (2015). A discussion of the ethical implications of random drug testing in the workplace. Healthc Manage Forum 28(4): 172-174. DOI: 10.1177/0840470415581251. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Craighead JE, Abraham JL, Churg AA, Green FH, Kleinerman J, Pratt P, et al. (1982). The pathology of asbestos-associated diseases of the lungs and pleural cavities: diagnostic criteria and proposed grading schema. Report of the Pneumoconiosis Committee of the College of American Pathologists and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Arch Pathol Lab Med 106(11): 544-596.
  19. Daba C, Atamo A, Gebrehiwot M (2022). Small scale enterprise workers require attention: what predicts the levelof occupational injuries?. Environ Health Insights 16: 1-8. DOI: 10.1177/11786302221104949. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Danis M (2019). Saving Lives with Statistics - An Introduction to Data Science in Workplace Safety. Society of Petroleum Engineers. DOI: 10.2118/195737-MS. Go to original source...
  21. Donaldson K, Aitken R, Tran L, Stone V, Duffin R, Forrest G, et al. (2006). Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety. Toxicol Sci 92(1): 5-22. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 133: 285-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070. Go to original source...
  23. Elenge M, Brouwer CD (2011). Identification of hazards in the workplaces of Artisanal mining in Katanga. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 24: 57-66. DOI: 10.2478/s13382-011-0012-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Gray SE, Sekendiz B, Norton KI, Dietrich JK, Keyzer P, Coyle IR, Finch CF (2016). The development and application of an observational audit tool for use in Australian fitness facilities. J Fit Res 5: 29-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.019. Go to original source...
  25. Hamor WA (1914). The national council for industrial safety. Ind Eng Chem 6(11): 961-962. DOI: 10.1021/ie50071a033. Go to original source...
  26. Harmse JL, Engelbrecht JC, Bekker JL (2016). The impact of physical and ergonomic hazards on poultry abattoir processing workers: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(2): 1-24. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13020197. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Heydari A, Fallah-Aliabadi S (2021). Application of FMEA and AHP in Elevated Highway Construction Project Risk Assessment. Arch Occup Health 5(2): 988-992. DOI: 10.18502/aoh.v5i2.6194. Go to original source...
  28. Huang SZ, Wu KY (2019). Health risk assessment of photoresists used in an optoelectronic semiconductor factory. Risk Anal, 39(12): 2625-2639. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13366 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Huang YH, Chang WR, Cheung JH, Lee J, Kines P, He Y (2021). The role of employee perceptions of safety priorities on safety outcomes across organisational levels. Ergonomics 64(6): 768-777. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1859139. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Ilbahar E, Karaşan A, Cebi S, Kahraman C (2018). A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Saf Sci 103: 124-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025. Go to original source...
  31. Ismail SN, Ramli A, Aziz HA (2021). Research trends in mining accidents study: A systematic literature review. Saf Sci 143: 105438. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105438. Go to original source...
  32. Jilcha K, Kitaw D (2017). Industrial occupational safety and health innovation for sustainable development. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20(1): 372-380. DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2016.10.011. Go to original source...
  33. Khosravi Y, Asilian-Mahabadi H, Hajizadeh E, Hassanzadeh-Rangi N, Bastani H, Khavanin A, Mortazavi SB (2013). Modeling the factors affecting unsafe behavior in the construction industry from safety supervisors' perspective. J Res Health Sci 14(1): 29-35.
  34. Komaki J, Barwick KD, Scott LR (1978). A behavioral approach to occupational safety: pinpointing and reinforcing safe performance in a food manufacturing plant. J Appl Psychol 63(4): 434-445. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.434. Go to original source...
  35. Koo JE, Ki ES (2020). Corporate social responsibility and employee safety: evidence from Korea. Sustainability 12(7): 1-14. DOI: 10.3390/su12072649. Go to original source...
  36. Lee J, Mahendra S, Alvarez PJ (2010). Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. ACS Nano 4(7): 3580-3590. DOI: 10.1021/nn100866w. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Lee JY (2022). How does psychological safety foster employee performance? A serial multiple mediation of job crafting and thriving. Int J Organ Theory Behav 25(3/4): 98-112. DOI: 10.1108/ijotb-12-2021-0239. Go to original source...
  38. Lee KE, McMullen N, Kota H, Peterson K, Oravec C, Frey C, et al. (2021). Predictors of citations in neurosurgical research: a 5-year follow-up. World Neurosurg 153: 66-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.029. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Li J, Goerlandt F, Van Nunen K, Ponnet K, Reniers G (2022). Conceptualising the contextual dynamics of safety climate andsafety culture research: A comparative scientometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(2): 813. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020813. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Liang H, Zhang S, Su Y (2020). The structure and emerging trends of construction safety management research: a bibliometric review. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 26(3): 469-488. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1444565. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Liu SX, Chen HZ, Mei Q, Zhou Y, Edmund NNK (2022). Impact analysis of behavior of front-line managers on employee safety behavior by integrating interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian network. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 28(4): 2426-2438. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2022.2079840. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Mansor NRN, Arifin K, Awang A, Jarmin R, Mohamed Z, Sahimi A, Derahim N (2019). Biological risk and occupational safety: health among nurses. Asian Journal of Environment, History and Heritage 3(2): 11-18.
  43. Merigó JM, Miranda J, Modak NM, Boustras G, De La Sotta C (2019). Forty years of Safety Science: A bibliometric overview. Safe Sci 115: 66-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.029. Go to original source...
  44. Nazir S, Shafi A, Asadullah MA, Qun W, Khadim S (2021). Linking paternalistic leadership to follower's innovative work behavior: the influence of leader-member exchange and employee voice. Eur J Innov Manag 24(4): 1354-1378. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-01-2020-0005. Go to original source...
  45. Neu-Baker NM, Eastlake A, Hodson L (2022). Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(13): 7676. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137676. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Newaz MT, Ershadi M, Jefferies M, Davis P (2021). Assessing safety management factors to develop a research agenda for the construction industry. Saf Sci 142: 105396. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105396. Go to original source...
  47. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372: n160. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n160. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Perkins EJ, Ashauer R, Burgoon L, Conolly R, Landesmann B, Mackay C, et al. (2019). Building and applying quantitative adverse outcome pathway models for chemical hazard and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 38(9): 1850-1865. DOI: 10.1002/etc.4505. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Pranckutė R (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today's academic world. Publications 9(1): 12. DOI: 10.3390/publications9010012. Go to original source...
  50. Robson LS, Clarke JA, Cullen K, Bielecky A, Severin C, Bigelow PL, et al. (2007). The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: a systematic review. Saf Sci 45(3): 329-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.003. Go to original source...
  51. Roldán CA (2019). La responsabilidad civil derivada de accidentes de trabajo. Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial 10(12): 149-168. DOI: 10.35292/ropj.v10i12.28. Go to original source...
  52. Roslan MF, Abd Razak MR, Abdullah KH, Ishak NS, Sofyan D (2023). Unveiling the trends of safety motivation research in Scopus and Web of Science databases. Asian J Law Govern 4(4): 66-77. DOI: 10.55057/ajlg.2022.4.4.6. Go to original source...
  53. Ruiz-Rosero J, Ramírez-González G, Viveros-Delgado J (2019). Software survey: ScientoPy, a scientometric tool for topics trend analysis in scientific publications. Scientometrics 121(2): 1165-1188. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03213-w. Go to original source...
  54. Sadatsafavi H, Walewski J, Shepley MM (2015). The influence of facility design and human resource management on health care professionals. Health Care Manage Rev 40(2): 126-138. DOI: 10.1097/ HMR.0000000000000012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. Silveira FF, Zilber SN (2017). Is social innovation about innovation? A bibliometric study identifying the main authors, citations and co-citations over 20 years. Int J Entrep Innov Manag 21(6): 459-484. DOI: 10.1504/IJEIM.2017.086936. Go to original source...
  56. Sofian FNRM, Abdullah KH, Mohd-Sabrun I (2023). Research on corporate reputation: a bibliometric review of 43 years (1977-2020). Int J Inf Sci Manag 21(2): 31-54. DOI: 10.22034/ijism.2023.1977558.0. Go to original source...
  57. Spurgeon A, Harrington JM, Cooper CL (1997). Health and safety problems associated with long working hours: a review of the current position. Occup Environ Med 54(6): 367-375. DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.6.367. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  58. Tamers SL, Chosewood LC, Childress A, Hudson H, Nigam J, Chang CC (2019). Total Worker Health® 2014-2018: the novel approach to worker safety, health, and well-being evolves. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(3): 321. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030321. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  59. Tao J, Yang F, Qiu D, Reniers G (2020). Analysis of safety leadership using a science mapping approach. Process Saf Environ Prot 140: 244-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.04.031. Go to original source...
  60. Taurozzi JS, Hackley VA, Wiesner MR (2011). Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment-issues and recommendations. Nanotoxicology 5(4): 711-729. DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2010.528846. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  61. Thompson DF, Walker CK (2015). A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences. Pharmacotherapy 35(6): 551-559. DOI: 10.1002/phar.1586. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  62. Tullu MS (2019). Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key. Saudi J Anaesth 13(Suppl. 1): S12-S17. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_685_18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  63. Van Gelderen SC, Zegers M, Boeijen W, Westert GP, Robben PB, Wollersheim HC (2017). Evaluation of the organisation and effectiveness of internal audits to govern patient safety in hospitals: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 7: 1-10. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015506. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  64. Willis K, Ezer P, Lewis S, Bismark M, Smallwood N (2021). "Covid just amplified the cracks of the system": working as a frontline health worker during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(19): 10178. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910178. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  65. Zacharatos A, Barling J, Iverson RD (2005). High-performance work systems and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol 90(1): 77-93. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.77. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  66. Zaira MM, Hadikusumo BH (2017). Structural equation model of integrated safety intervention practices affecting the safety behaviour of workers in the construction industry. Saf Sci 98: 124-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.007. Go to original source...
  67. Zupic I, Čater T (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organisation. Organ Res Methods 18(3): 429-472. DOI: 10.1177/1094428114562629. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.