Kontakt 2024, 26(1):69-76 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2023.045
Perceived functioning of the family system in professional foster familiesSocial Sciences in Health - Original article
- 1 Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Faculty of Social Sciences and Health Care, Nitra, Slovak Republic
- 2 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Institute of Social and Special-paedagogical Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 3 University Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Community & Occupational Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse the differences in the perception of the functioning of the family system between professional foster parents, their life partners, biological children, and children placed in professional foster families.
Methods: The sample consisted of 401 respondents. The functioning of the family system was measured using the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale - FACES IV. The Family Communication Scale and the Family Satisfaction Scale were administered to assess communication and satisfaction with the family system.
Results: The results of the statistical analyses did not confirm differences in the perception of the functioning of the family system between professional foster parents and their life partners, nor between the biological children of professional foster parents and children placed in professional foster families. Professional foster parents and children placed in professional foster families differed statistically significantly in balanced cohesion. Professional foster parents and their biological children differed statistically significantly in their perception of disengaged cohesion. Partners of professional foster parents and children placed in professional foster families differed in their perception of family adaptability, with children in professional foster families perceiving family functioning as more rigid compared to partners of professional foster parents. The results also indicated that biological children perceived family cohesion as more disengaged than partners of professional foster parents.
Conclusion: Understanding the functioning of the family system of professional families is important in effectively applying a systems approach when working with this target group.
Keywords: Family adaptability; Family cohesion; Family communication; Family system; Olson's circular model; Professional foster family
Grants and funding:
This paper was written as part of the project VEGA No.1/0868/21 "The use of selected elements of the systems approach in the context of professional families".
Conflicts of interest:
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Received: September 12, 2023; Revised: October 27, 2023; Accepted: December 5, 2023; Prepublished online: December 5, 2023; Published: March 15, 2024 Show citation
References
- Baiocco R, Cacioppo M, Laghi F, Tafà M (2013). Factorial and Construct Validity of FACES IV Among Italian Adolescents. J Child Fam Stud 22(7): 962-970. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-012-9658-1.
Go to original source... - Becvar DS, Becvar RJ (2018). Systems Theory and Family Therapy: A primer. Hamilton Books, 106 p.
- Berg IK (1992). Posílení rodiny. Příručka krátké terapie. Praha: Institut pro systemickou zkušenost, 138 p.
- Bokhorst CL, Sumter SR, Westenberg PM (2009). Social Support from Parents, Friends, Classmates, and Teachers in Children and Adolescents aged 9 to 18 Years: Who is Perceived as Most Supportive? Soc Dev 19(2): 417-426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00540.
Go to original source... - Boyraz, G, Sayger TV (2011). Psychological Well-Being Among Fathers of Children With and Without Disabilities: The Role of Family Cohesion, Adaptability, and Paternal Self-Efficacy. Am J Mens Health 5(4): 286-296. DOI: 10.1177/1557988310372538.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Burns BJ, Phillips SD, Wagner HR, Barth RP, Kolko DJ, Campbell Y, Landsverk J (2004). Mental health need and access to mental health services by youths involved with child welfare: A national survey. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 43(8): 960-970. DOI: 10.1097/01.chi.0000127590.95585.65.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Craddock AE (2001). Family System and Family Functioning: Circumplex Model and FACES IV. J Fam Stud 7(1): 29-39. DOI: 10.5172/jfs.7.1.29.
Go to original source... - Cumsille PE, Epstein N (1994). Family cohesion, family adaptability, social support, and adolescent depressive symptoms in outpatient clinic families. J Fam Psychol 8(2): 202-214. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.8.2.202.
Go to original source... - Degarmo J (2013). The Foster Parenting Manual: A Practical Guide to Creating a Loving, Safe and Stable Home. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 160 p.
- Doležalová P, Červenka K, Vojtová V (2022). Attachment of vulnerable adolescents in residential facilities in the Czech Republic. Kontakt 24(1): 92-97. DOI: 10.32725/kont.2021.042.
Go to original source... - Everri M, Caricati L, Mancini T, Messena M, Fruggeri L (2020). Italina Validation of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES IV) Short Version for Adolescents: SAD_FACES. J Child Fam Stud 29(9): 2507-2514. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-020-01771-9.
Go to original source... - Feldman SS, Gehring TM (1988). Changing Perceptions of Family Cohesion and Power across Adolescence. Child Development 59(4): 1034-1046. DOI: 10.2307/1130269.
Go to original source... - Gomes HS, Gouveia-Pereira M (2019). Testing the General Theory of Crime with the Circumplex Model: Curvilinear Relations between Family Functioning and Self-Control. Deviant Behav 41(6): 779-791. DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2019.1596449.
Go to original source... - Graham PJ (2004). The end of adolescence. New York: Oxford University Press, 268 p.
Go to original source... - Gupta G, Bowie CR (2016). Family cohesion and flexibility in early episode psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry 12(5): 886-892. DOI: 10.1111/eip.12384.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Keil V, Price JM (2006). Externalizing behavior disorders in child welfare settings: Definition, prevalence, and implications for assessment and treatment. Child Youth Serv Rev 28(7): 761-779. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.08.006.
Go to original source... - Kelly W (2017). Understanding Children in Foster Care: Identifying and addressing what children learn from maltreatment. Palgrave Macmillan, 232 p.
Go to original source... - Kirton D (2012). Step forward? Step back? Professionalisation of fostering. Social Work and Social Sciences 13(1): 6-24. DOI: 10.1921/swssr.v13i1.465.
Go to original source... - Kouneski EF (2000). The family circumplex model, faces II, and faces III: Overview of research and applications. Minnesota: Department of Family Social Science.
- Macek P (2003). Adolescence. Praha: Portál, 144 p.
- Merkel WT, Searight HR (1992). Why families are not like swamps, solar systems, or thermostats: some limits of systems theory as applied to family therapy. Contemp Fam Ther 14(1): 33-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF00891748.
Go to original source... - Minuchin S (1974). Families & Family Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 268 p.
Go to original source... - Montgomery J, Fewer J (1988). Family systems and beyond. New York: Human Science Press, 197 p.
- Navrátilová J, Navrátil P, Punová M (2021). The Well-being of Children and Young People: The Context of Social Services from the Perspective of the Capability Approach. Clin Soc Work Health Intervent 12(4): 49-61. DOI: 10.22359/cswhi_12_4_06.
Go to original source... - Noller P, Callan VJ (1986). Adolescent and parent perceptions of family cohesion and adaptability. J Adolesc 9(1): 97-106. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-1971(86)80030-6.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Olecká I, Pospíšil J, Trochtová L (2023). Přenos vzorců chování souvisejících se zneužíváním alkoholu z rodičů na dětiv české populaci. Kontakt 25(2):138-146. DOI: 10.32725/kont.2023.020.
Go to original source... - Olson DH (1993). Family Continuity and Change. A Family Life-Cycle Perspective. In: Brubaker TH (Ed.). Family Relations. Challenges for the Future. USA: SAGE Publications, Inc., pp. 17-40.
Go to original source... - Olson DH (2010). FACES IV Manual. Minnesota: Life Innovations, Inc., 23 p.
- Olson DH, Barnes H (2004). Family Communication. Minnesota: Life Innovations.
- Olson DH, Gorall DM (2003). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems. In: Walsh F (Ed.). Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity. The Guilford Press, pp. 514-548. DOI: 10.4324/9780203428436_chapter_19.
Go to original source... - Patterson JM (2002). Understanding family resilience. J Clin Psychol 58(3): 233-246. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.10019.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Pereira GM, Teixeira, RJ (2013). Portuguese validation of FACES-IV in adult children caregivers facing parental cancer. Contemp Fam Ther 35 (3): 478-490. DOI: 10.1007/s10591-012-9216-4.
Go to original source... - Popelková M, Šeboková G (2015). Rodinný systém a jeho miesto vo vývine adolescentov. Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre, 137 p.
- Prange ME, Greenbaum PE, Silver SE, Friedman RM, Kutash K, Duchnowski AJ (1992). Family functioning and psychopathology among adolescents with severe emotional disturbances. J Abnorm Child Psychol 20(1): 83-102. DOI: 10.1007/BF00927118.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Rosnati R, Iafrate R, Scabini E, (2007). Parent-adolescent communication in foster, inter-country adoptive, and biological Italian families: Gender and generational differences. Int J Psychol 42(1): 36-45. DOI: 10.1080/00207590500412128.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Sarour EOA, El Khesky ES (2021). Investigating the Psychometric Properties of Arabic Version of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale IV (FACES IV) in Saudi Arabia. J Fam Issues 43(10): 2767-2787. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X211033936.
Go to original source... - Sentse M, Laird RD (2010). Parent-child relationship and dyadic friendship experiences as predictors of behavior problems in early adolescence. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 39(6): 873-884. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2010.517160.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Stace S, Lowe K (2009). Reducing risks for young people in foster care. A UK study: Research report. Brighton: TSA Publishing Ltd., 116 p.
- Trommsdorff G, Schwarz B (2007). The 'Intergenerational Stake Hypothesis' in Indonesia and Germany: Adult Daughters´and their Mothers´ Perception of their Relationship. Curr Sociol 55(4): 599-620. DOI: 10.1177/0011392107077641.
Go to original source... - Vágnerová M (2012). Vývinová psychologie: Dětství a dospívání. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 536 p.
- Walsh F (1998). Strengthening family resilience. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Watzlawick P, Bavelas JB, Jackson DD (1999). Pragmatika lidské komunikace: interakční vzorce, patologie a paradoxy. Hradec Králové: Konfrontace, 243 p.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


