Kontakt X:X | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2026.063

Institutional views on patient involvement in undergraduate interprofessional healthcare educationSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Adrijana Svenšek ORCID...1, *, Lucija Gosak ORCID...1, Matthijs Hugo Bosveld ORCID...2, 3, Dante N. Mulder2, 4, Matilde Leal ORCID...5, Catarina Raposo-Lima ORCID...6, Cathy C. Kline ORCID...7, Carolina Garcez ORCID...6, 8, Pedro Morgado ORCID...9, 10, Mateja Lorber ORCID...1, Barbara Kegl ORCID...1, Ricardo J. O. Ferreira ORCID...5, 11, 12
1 University of Maribor, Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS), Maribor, Slovenia
2 Maastricht University, Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
3 Maastricht University, Department of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht, The Netherlands
4 Stichting Mens achter de Patiënt, Eijsden, The Netherlands
5 Nursing School of Lisbon, Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
6 University of Minho, School of Medicine, Braga, Portugal
7 University of British Columbia, Office of the Vice-President, Health, Patient & Community Partnership for Education, Vancouver, Canada
8 Associação EUPATI Portugal, Project Management, Lisboa, Portugal
9 University of Minho, School of Medicine, Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), Braga, Portugal
10 Clinical Academic Center, Braga, Portugal
11 Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Saúde Ambiental, Lisbon, Portugal
12 Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Medicina, Laboratório Associado TERRA, Lisboa, Portugal

Introduction: Patient and public involvement (PPI) and interprofessional education (IPE) are established in undergraduate healthcare education, yet their integration is rarely described. This study explored how experienced institutions implement PPI within IPE and what sustains it.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study used six semi-structured online interviews with key informants from institutions in Europe and Canada, purposively selected for their long-standing programmes. Data were analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis, distinguishing manifest categories from latent themes.

Results: Six manifest categories were identified: objectives, implementation, recruitment, challenges, interprofessional collaboration, and evaluation. Three latent themes were formulated: experiential knowledge as expertise requiring continual legitimation, the patient partner as connective tissue of interprofessional learning, and sustainability as invisible relational and organisational labour. Participants reported benefits for communication, reflection and teamwork, alongside role ambiguity, logistical demands, and emotional burden on patient partners.

Conclusion: Participants described sustainable involvement as depending on competency-based and inclusive recruitment, preparation of patient partners and faculty, funded coordination, embedding in the curriculum, and ethical safeguards. The reported benefits for students reflect the perceptions of institutional representatives and need to be confirmed in future research.

Keywords: Healthcare education; Interprofessional education; Patient-centred care; Patient involvement; Public involvement; Qualitative research
Grants and funding:

This study is part of the PULPIT research consortium, which stands for Public and Patient Involvement in Interprofessional Education of Undergraduate Healthcare Students. The consortium (2023-1-PT01-KA220-HED-000165015) was co-funded by the European Union's Erasmus+ Program. The funder had no role in this study. Views and opinions expressed are those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Received: April 7, 2026; Revised: July 24, 2026; Accepted: October 22, 2026; Prepublished online: October 23, 2026 

Download citation

Attachments

Download fileKONT_Svensek_1957_Suppl-mat.pdf

File size: 152.53 kB

References

  1. Bartholomew N, McKillop A, Barr O (2026). Approaching undergraduate interprofessional education (IPE) from a holistic program design perspective: an umbrella review. J Interprof Care 40(2): 400-416. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2025.2582054. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bennett-Weston A, Gay S, Anderson ES (2023). A theoretical systematic review of patient involvement in health and social care education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 28(1): 279-304. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-022-10137-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bosveld MH, Romme S, de Nooijer J, Smeets HWH, van Dongen JJJ, van Bokhoven MA (2023). Seeing the patient as a person in interprofessional health professions education. J Interprof Care 37(3): 457-463. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2093843. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Brown MEL, Dueñas AN (2020). A medical science educator's guide to selecting a research paradigm: building a basis for better research. Med Sci Educ 30(1): 545-553. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00898-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Carel H, Kidd IJ (2014). Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophical analysis. Med Health Care Philos 17(4): 529-540. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9560-2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education (2002). Defining IPE. London: CAIPE. [online] cit. 2026-01-30]. Available from: https://www.caipe.org
  7. Cullen M, Cadogan C, George S, Murphy S, Freeney S, Fitzpatrick R, Strawbridge J (2022). Key stakeholders' views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions' education: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 22(1): 305. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03373-z. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dijk SW, Duijzer EJ, Wienold M (2020). Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMJ Open 10(7): e037217. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037217. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Eijkelboom C, Brouwers M, Frenkel J, van Gurp P, Jaarsma D, de Jonge R, et al. (2023). Twelve tips for patient involvement in health professions education. Patient Educ Couns 106: 92-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.016. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ferreira RJO, Leal M, Mateus EF, Gosak L, Bosveld MH, Kline CC; PULPIT Consortium (2024). Letter to the Editor: Best Practices on Public and Patient Involvement in Interprofessional Healthcare Education. Health Expect 27(5): e70053. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70053. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Ferri P, Vivarelli C, Lui F, Alberti S, Rovesti S, Serafini A, et al. (2023). Evaluation of an interprofessional education intervention in partnership with patient educators. Acta Biomed 94(5): e2023250. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v94i5.14825. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Fossey E, Bonnamy J, Dart J, Petrakis M, Buus N, Soh SE, et al. (2024). What does consumer and community involvement in health-related education look like? A mixed methods study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 29(4): 1199-1218. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-023-10301-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Graneheim UH, Lundman B (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 24(2): 105-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Gross O, Ruelle Y (2025). The pedagogical liminality of patient and public involvement in initial healthcare professional education: an umbrella review. Res Involv Engagem 11(1): 52. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-025-00704-4. Go to original source...
  15. Hatch S, Fitzgibbon J, Tonks AJ, Forty L (2024). Diversity in patient and public involvement in healthcare research and education: realising the potential. Health Expect 27(1): e13896. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13896. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Hennink M, Kaiser BN (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med 292: 114523. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Jones J, Cowe M, Marks S, McAllister T, Mendoza A, Ponniah C, et al. (2021). Reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research publications: using the GRIPP2 checklists with lay co-researchers. Res Involv Engagem 7(1): 52. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00295-w. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Kahlke R, O'Brien BC, Varpio L (2026). Qualitative research interviews for health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 185. Med Teach 48(4): 528-541. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2025.2536697. Go to original source...
  19. Kiger ME, Varpio L (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach 42(8): 846-854. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Kline CC, Godolphin WJ, Chhina GS, Towle A (2013). Community as teacher model: health profession students learn cultural safety from an Aboriginal community. Mich J Community Serv Learn 20(1): 5-17.
  21. Kline CC, Park SE, Godolphin WJ, Towle A (2020). Professional identity formation: a role for patients as mentors. Acad Med 95(10): 1578-1586. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003561. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Kline CC, Riganti P, Moller-Hansen A, Godolphin W, Towle A (2022). Patients benefit from mentoring students in an interprofessional health mentors program: a contextual-developmental analysis. Med Teach 44(7): 730-736. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.2020737. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Locquet P, Pakarinen C, Derijcke D, Leal MR, Garcez C, Kline C, et al. (2026). Patient and public involvement and interprofessional education in undergraduate healthcare programs: an international survey study. Discov Educ 5(969). DOI: 10.1007/s44217-026-01814-1. Go to original source...
  24. Nowell L, Keogh B, Laios E, McKendrick-Calder L, Lucas Molitor W, Wilbur K (2024). Public participation in healthcare students' education: an umbrella review. Health Expect 27(1): e13974. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13974. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 89(9): 1245-1251. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, Kahlke R (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach 45(3): 241-251. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Percival CS, Martin PC, Maggio LA, Wyatt TR (2024). When I say … epistemic injustice. Med Educ 58(5): 497-498. DOI: 10.1111/medu.15300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Regan De Bere S, Nunn S (2016). Towards a pedagogy for patient and public involvement in medical education. Med Educ 50(1): 79-92. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12880. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Romme S, Bosveld MH, van Bokhoven MA, de Nooijer J, van den Besselaar H, van Dongen JJJ (2020). Patient involvement in interprofessional education: a qualitative study yielding recommendations on incorporating the patient's perspective. Health Expect 23(4): 943-957. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13073. Go to original source...
  30. Romme S, Smeets HWH, Bosveld MH, van den Besselaar H, Kline C, van Bokhoven MA (2022). Involving patients in undergraduate health professions education: what's in it for them? Patient Educ Couns 105(7): 2190-2197. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Samarasekera DD, Nyoni CN, Amaral E, Grant J (2022). Challenges and opportunities in interprofessional education and practice. Lancet 400(10362): 1495-1497. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02086-4. Go to original source...
  32. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, et al. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 52(4): 1893-1907. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Towle A, Godolphin W (2013). Patients as educators: interprofessional learning for patient-centred care. Med Teach 35(3): 219-225. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.737966. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Towle A, Bainbridge L, Godolphin W, Katz A, Kline C, Lown B, et al. (2010). Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals. Med Educ 44(1): 64-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03530.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. WHO (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization. [online] [cit. 2026-08-15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice
  36. Wu A, Hong Y, Li M, Yang J, Lin G, Ou W, et al. (2026). Evaluation of the effectiveness of interprofessional education among health professions students: an umbrella review. Nurse Educ Today 156: 106909. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106909. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.