Kontakt X:X | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2025.059

Insights into healthcare workers' views on the electronic hand hygiene monitoring systemNursing - Original article

Vanesa Chebenová1, 2, Veronika Bučková1, Zuzana ©kvarková1, Andrea Botíková3, Jaroslava Sokolová1, 2, *
1 Faculty Hospital Trnava, Department of Hospital Hygiene and Epidemiology, Trnava, Slovak Republic
2 University of Trnava, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Center for Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Trnava, Slovak Republic
3 University of Trnava, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Department of Nursing, Trnava, Slovak Republic

Aim: This study analyzed healthcare workers' attitudes towards an electronic digital hand hygiene (HH) monitoring system before and after its implementation at Trnava University Hospital (FNTT).

Methods: A comparative before-and-after study was conducted using the NosoEx® electronic HH monitoring system (GWA Hygiene GmbH) in two clinics at FNTT, Slovakia. The study periods were 24.04.2023 - 31.12.2023 and 22.04.2024 - 31.12.2024. A total of 277 healthcare workers participated in the surveys.

Results: After implementation, willingness to have behaviour monitored increased significantly at the clinic without transponders from 77.4% to 97.0% (p = 0.0181), along with acceptance of long-term monitoring (p = 0.0121). Stress related to monitoring decreased (p = 0.0069). At the clinic with transponders, discomfort with hand disinfection dropped from 72.7% to 42.1% (p = 0.0001) and stress levels also fell (p = 0.0001). Openness to permanent implementation increased at this clinic (p = 0.0072).

Conclusion: Introducing the electronic HH monitoring system positively influenced healthcare workers' attitudes, increased their willingness to be monitored, and reduced stress. This system is an effective tool to improve HH compliance in clinical settings.

Keywords: Automatization; Compliance; Digitalization; Hand hygiene; Healthcare-associated infections; Surveillance
Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Received: June 17, 2025; Revised: August 31, 2025; Accepted: October 17, 2025; Prepublished online: November 26, 2025 

Download citation

Attachments

Download fileKONT_Sokolova_1697_Suppl-materials.pdf

File size: 61.81 kB

References

  1. Blomgren P, Lytsy B, Hjelm K, Swenne C (2021). Healthcare workers' perceptions and acceptance of an electronic reminder system for hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect 108: 197-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Boyce J (2017). Electronic monitoring in combination with direct observation as a means to significantly improve hand hygiene compliance. In Am J Infect Control 45(5): 528-535. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.11.029. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Dufour J, Reynier P, Boudjema S, Soto Aladro A, Giorgi R, Brouqui P (2017). Evaluation of hand hygiene compliance and associated factors with a radio-frequency-identification-based real-time continuous automated monitoring system. In J Hosp Infect 95(4): 344-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Granqvist K, Ahlstrom L, Karlsson J, Lytsy B, Andersson A (2022). Learning to interact with new technology: Health care workers' experiences of using a monitoring system for assessing hand hygiene - a grounded theory study. In Am J Infect Control 50(6): 651-656. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.09.023. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Iversen A, Kavalaris C, Hansen R, Hansen M, Alexander R, Kostadinov K, et al. (2020). Clinical experiences with a new system for automated hand hygiene monitoring: A prospective observational study. In Am J Infect Control 48(5): 527-533. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.09.003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Kelly D, Pursell E, Wigglesworth N, Gould D (2021). Electronic hand hygiene monitoring systems can be well-tolerated by health workers: Findings of a qualitative study. In J Infect Prev 22(6): 246-251. DOI: 10.1177/17571774211012781. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Kwok YLA, Juergens CP, McLaws ML (2016). Automated hand hygiene auditing with and without an intervention. Am J Infect Control 44(12): 1475-1480. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. McKay K J, Shaban R Z, Feguson P (2020). Hand hygiene compliance monitoring: Do video-based technologies offer opportunities for the future? In Infect Dis Health 25(2): 92-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2019.12.002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Shenoy E, Branch-Elliman W (2023). Automating surveillance for healthcare-associated infections: Rationale and current realities (Part I/III). Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 3(1): e25. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2022.312. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Stoumpos A, Kitsios F, Talias M (2023). Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications. In Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(4): 3407. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043407. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Xu N, Liu C, Meng X, Lv Q, Lan C (2021). Influence of the Internet of Things management system on hand hygiene compliance is an emergency intensive care unit. In J Hosp Infect 109: 101-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. WHO (2023). WHO research agenda for hand hygiene in health care 2023-2030: summary. Geneva, 10 p.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.