Kontakt X:X | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2025.053

From expertise to empathy: multi-dimensional brand perception in Czech healthcareSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Zbyněk Stavař ORCID...1, Alena Hricová ORCID...2, *
1 Pan-European University, Faculty Management College of Business and Law, Department of Marketing, Prague, Czech Republic
2 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Social and Special-paedagogical Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Background: Brand management in healthcare is becoming increasingly important due to marketization and rising patient expectations. However, the specific nature of this sector - including ethical norms and patient vulnerability - challenges the direct application of commercial branding models.

Objective: The aim of this study is to identify key factors influencing brand perception among Czech healthcare users, and to analyze the impact of sociodemographic and lifestyle variables on this perception.

Methods: A quantitative survey was conducted on a representative online panel of 502 Czech adults. The structured questionnaire focused on brand awareness, quality, trust, ethical reputation, and patient experience. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and exploratory factor analysis.

Results: The findings show that quality of care, professional competence, and communication with patients are the strongest determinants of brand perception. Significant differences were identified by education and gender - higher education emphasizes quality, while women place greater emphasis on relational and emotional aspects of care. The expected stronger role of digital resources or DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) topics among younger respondents was not confirmed. Financial aspects were less important in the metropolitan context.

Conclusion: Brand perception in Czech healthcare reflects a complex mix of professional, ethical, financial, and relational factors. Institutions should combine professional expertise with sensitive communication and ethical conduct to build long-term trust and loyalty.

Keywords: Brand management; Czech Republic; Ethical communication; Healthcare branding; Patient perception; Quality of care
Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Received: July 24, 2025; Revised: October 8, 2025; Accepted: November 6, 2025; Prepublished online: November 7, 2025 

Download citation

References

  1. Aaker DA (2003). Brand building: budování značky: Vytvoření silné značky a její úspěšné zavedení na trh. Computer Press, 298 p.
  2. Ackovska A, Grozdanova A, Sterjev Z, Tonik Ribarska J, Anchevska Netkovska K (2020). The role of branding in the healthcare system with special review to healthcare institutions. Knowledge Int J - Med Sci Health 41(6): 489-501.
  3. Afful-Dadzie E, Afful-Dadzie A, Egala SB (2023). Social media in health communication: A literature review of information quality. Health Inf Manag 52(1): 3-17. DOI: 10.1177/1833358321992683. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Barták M (2010). Ekonomika zdraví: Sociální, ekonomické a právní aspekty péče o zdraví. Wolters Kluwer ČR, 224 p.
  5. Bryndová L, Šlegerová L, Votápková J, Hroboň P, Shuftan N, Spranger A (2023). Czechia: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition 25(1). [online] [cit. 2025-01-22]. Available from: https://silapacientu.cz/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Czechia-Health-System-Review.pdf
  6. Buh A, Kang R, Kiska R, Fung SG, Solmi M, Scott M, et al. (2024). Effect and outcome of equity, diversity and inclusion programs in healthcare institutions: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 14(4): e085007. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. CivicScience (2022). Gen Z leads in trusting online reviews. [online] [cit. 2025-07-22]. Available from: https://civicscience.com/gen-z-leads-in-trusting-online-reviews/
  8. Cochrane BS, Hagins M, Jr., King JA, Picciano G, McCafferty MM, Nelson B (2015). Back to the future: patient experience and the link to quality, safety, and financial performance. Healthc Manage Forum 28(6 Suppl): S47-S58). DOI: 10.1177/0840470415598405. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Estate Regulation No. 10 [Stavovský předpis č. 10 (LK)] (2025). Etický kodex České lékařské komory. ASPI. Wolters Kluwer. [online] [cit. 2025-01-10]. Available from: https://www.aspi.cz/products/lawText/1/50306/129/2/stavovsky-predpis-c-10-lk-eticky-kodex-ceske-lekarske-komory/stavovsky-predpis-c-10-lk-eticky-kodex-ceske-lekarske-komory
  10. Gladkij I, et al. (2003). Management ve zdravotnictví. Brno: Computer Press, 380 p.
  11. Harris F, de Chernatony L (2001). Corporate branding and corporate brand performance. Eur J Mark 35(3/4): 441-456. DOI: 10.1108/03090560110382101. Go to original source...
  12. Huang EC, Pu C, Chou YJ, Huang N (2018). Public trust in physicians - Health care commodification as a possible deteriorating factor: Cross-sectional analysis of 23 countries. Inquiry 55: 46958018759174. DOI: 10.1177/0046958018759174. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kalieva OM (2015). Development of territory brand image: The marketing aspect. Rev Eur Stud 7(2): 23-28. DOI: 10.5539/res.v7n2p23. Go to original source...
  14. Keller KL (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J Mark 57(1): 1-22. DOI: 10.1177/002224299305700101. Go to original source...
  15. Kim KH, Kim KS, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kang SH (2008). Brand equity in hospital marketing. J Bus Res 61(1): 75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.05.010. Go to original source...
  16. Malina A (2013). Úvod do veřejného zdravotnictví pro nelékaře. Institut postgraduálního vzdělávání ve zdravotnictví, 65 p.
  17. Marinova D, de Ruyter K, Huang MH, Meuter ML, Challagalla G (2017). Getting smart: Learning from technology-empowered frontline interactions. J Serv Res 20(1): 29-42. DOI: 10.1177/1094670516679273. Go to original source...
  18. Nikhil D, Divya KL, Mamadapur M, Patil HS, Pinnam HS, Bansal P (2025). Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Professionals: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey. Digit J Clin Med 7(3): 9. DOI: 10.55691/2582-3868.1261. Go to original source...
  19. Pew Research Center (2023, February 22). 60% of Americans would be uncomfortable with provider relying on AI in their own health care. [online] [cit. 2025-01-22]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/02/22/60-of-americans-would-be-uncomfortable-with-provider-relying-on-ai-in-their-own-health-care/
  20. Ptáček R, Bartůněk P, et al. (2011). Etika a komunikace v medicíně. Praha: Grada, 528 p.
  21. Raka Sukawati TG (2021). Hospital brand image, service quality, and patient satisfaction in pandemic situation. Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit 10(2): 122-130. DOI: 10.18196/jmmr.v10i2.12230. Go to original source...
  22. Santos-Vijande ML, del Río-Lanza AB, Suárez-Álvarez L, Días-Martín AM (2013). The brand management system and service firm competitiveness. J Bus Res 66(2): 148-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.07.007. Go to original source...
  23. Shimul AS, Azim SMF, Cheah I (2025). Deciphering the impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) on B2B salesperson's performance. J Glob Mark 38(1): 80-100. DOI: 10.1080/08911762.2024.2424826. Go to original source...
  24. Suomi K, Saraniemi S, Vähätalo M, Kallio TJ, Tevameri T (2021). Employee engagement and internal branding: Two sides of the same coin? Corp Reputation Rev 24: 48-63. DOI: 10.1057/s41299-019-00090-0. Go to original source...
  25. Swanson KM (2013). Empirical development of a middle range theory of nursing. In: Smith MC, Turkel MC, Wolf ZR (Eds). Caring in nursing classics: An essential resource (pp. 211-221). Springer, 532 p. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.