Kontakt 2026, 28(1):98-105 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2026.012

The online environment as a risk factor for suicidal behaviour in adolescents: challenges for social workSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Soňa ©robárová * ORCID..., Marek Stachoň ORCID...
St. Elizabeth University of Health and Social Work in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Introduction: The study examines the relationship between the use of digital environments and suicidal vulnerability among adolescents aged 15-18, emphasizing the implications for contemporary social work practice. The research responds to the growing need for evidence-based approaches to understanding how online interactions influence youth mental health, loneliness, and help-seeking behaviour.

Methods: A mixed-methods design was employed. The quantitative component consisted of an electronic questionnaire administered to secondary-school students aged 15-18 (n = 168), verified for reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.87). The qualitative component comprised semi-structured interviews with six social workers, thematically analysed and independently coded in MAXQDA (κ = 0.91). All procedures were conducted in accordance with ethical standards and approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Results: The findings indicate that the quality rather than quantity of online engagement significantly influences adolescents' mental well-being. Participants who reported higher levels of loneliness expressed stronger support for the presence of mental-health professionals in digital spaces. Social workers identified cyberbullying, online loneliness, and exposure to suicidal content as major risks, but also recognized digital platforms as emerging opportunities for early prevention and psychosocial support.

Conclusion: The results highlight the urgent need to strengthen digital competencies, ethical awareness, and online intervention skills in social work. Developing inclusive, evidence-based prevention strategies tailored to adolescents' digital environments is essential for reducing online risks and promoting youth mental health.

Keywords: Adolescent mental health; Digital social work; Loneliness; Online intervention; Suicidal social work
Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Received: September 29, 2025; Revised: November 18, 2025; Accepted: January 28, 2026; Prepublished online: March 4, 2026; Published: March 17, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©robárová S, Stachoň M. The online environment as a risk factor for suicidal behaviour in adolescents: challenges for social work. Kontakt. 2026;28(1):98-105. doi: 10.32725/kont.2026.012.
Download citation

References

  1. Bauman Z (2003). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press, 176 p.
  2. Durkheim E (2007). On Suicide. Trans. Simpson G. London: Penguin Classics, 480 p.
  3. Frankl VE (2018). A přesto říci ľivotu ano: psycholog proľívá koncentrační tábor. 5th ed. Praha: Karmelitánské nakladatelství, 192 p.
  4. John A, Glendenning AC, Marchant A, Montgomery P, Stewart A, Wood S, et al. (2018). Self-Harm, Suicidal Behaviours, and Cyberbullying in Children and YoungPeople: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 20(4): e129. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9044. Go to original source...
  5. Joiner T (2005). Why people die by suicide. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 276 p.
  6. Keles B, McCrae N, Grealish A (2020). A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety, and psychological distress in adolescents. Int J Adolesc Youth 25(1): 79-93. DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851. Go to original source...
  7. Kocourková J, Koutek J (2017). Posttraumatická stresová porucha u dětí a dospívajících. Česká a slovenská psychiatrie: časopis České psychiatrické společnosti ČLS JEP a Psychiatrickej spoločnosti SLS 113(3): 128-131.
  8. Koutek J, Kocourková J (2007). Sebevraľedné chování. 2nd ed. Praha: Portál, 128 p.
  9. Lajčin D, Porubčanová D (2021). Team work during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Emerg Sci J 5(Special Issue): 1-10. DOI: 10.28991/esj-2021-SPER-01. Go to original source...
  10. Liu X, Huang J, Yu NX, Li Q, Zhu T (2020). Mediation Effect of Suicide-Related Social Media Use Behaviors on the Association Between Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempt: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res 22(4): e14940. DOI: 10.2196/14940. Go to original source...
  11. Mishna F, Sanders JE, Daciuk J, Milne E, Fantus S, Bogo M, et al. (2022). #socialwork: An International Study Examining Social Workers' Use of Information and Communication Technology. Br J Soc Work 52(2): 850-871. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcab066. Go to original source...
  12. Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Marsch LA, Bartels SJ (2016). The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 25(2): 113-22. DOI: 10.1017/S2045796015001067. Go to original source...
  13. NASW - National Association of Social Workers (2021). Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: NASW Press. [online] [cit. 2025-09-08]. Available from: https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
  14. NCZI - National Health Information Centre (2024). Samovraľdy a samovraľedné pokusy v SR 2023. [online] [cit. 2025-09-08]. Available from: https://www.nczisk.sk/Aktuality/Pages/Samovrazdy-a-samovrazedne-pokusy-v-Slovenskej-republike-v-roku-2023.aspx
  15. Nesi J, Prinstein MJ (2015). Using Social Media for Social Comparison and Feedback-Seeking: Gender and Popularity Moderate Associations with Depressive Symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol 43(8): 1427-1438. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-015-0020-0. Go to original source...
  16. O'Reilly M, Dogra N, Whiteman N, Hughes J, Eruyar S, Reilly P (2018). Is social media bad for mental health and wellbeing? Exploring the perspectives of adolescents. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 23(4): 601-613. DOI: 10.1177/1359104518775154. Go to original source...
  17. Patchin JW, Hinduja S (2012). Cyberbullying prevention and response: Expert perspectives. New York: Routledge, 224 p.
  18. Pierzak D, Bursová J (2024). Wpływ ¶rodowiska i otoczenia na zdrowie i życie współczesnych seniorów. In: Levická J, Orlíková M, Vaceková M (Eds). ®ivotné prostredie ako priestor pre spoluprácu. Trnava: Univerzita sv. Cyrila a Metoda v Trnave, pp. 30-39. [online] [cit. 2026-01-12]. Available from: https://fsvucm.sk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Zivotne-prostredie-ako-priestor_F.pdf
  19. Porubčanová D, Bursová J, Vaµko M, Bartoą P (2024). Perception of university social responsibility through the eyes of students: Comparative analysis of values, organisational efficiency, and educational process in Slovak universities. J Infras Policy Dev 8(12): 8786. DOI: 10.24294/jipd.v8i12.8786. Go to original source...
  20. Reamer FG (2013). Social work in a digital age: ethical and risk management challenges. Soc Work 58(2): 163-172. DOI: 10.1093/sw/swt003. Go to original source...
  21. ©pánik M (2017). Manaľment v sociálnej práci. In: ©tefáková L, et al. Metódy a metodika sociálnej práce III: Manaľérske postupy, plánovanie a metódy v sociálnej práci. Ruľomberok: Verbum, pp. 13-36.
  22. ©patenková N, et al. (2017). Krize a krizová intervence. Praha: Grada, 288 p.
  23. ©tefáková L (2016). Terminologické vymedzenie metód a metodiky sociálnej práce. In: ©tefáková L, Hulínová V, et al. Metódy a metodika sociálnej práce I. Ruľomberok: Verbum, 259 p.
  24. Twenge JM, Campbell WK (2010). The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. Atria Books, 368 p.
  25. WHO (2021). Suicide worldwide in 2019: Global health estimates. © WHO. [online] [cit. 2025-10-10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240026643
  26. Zapletal L, Porubčanová D, Dolinská E, Tamáąová V, Jankovičová A (2022). Factors of secondary socialization of children from home education. AD ALTA: J Interdiscip Res 12(2): 204-209. DOI: 10.33543/1202204209. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.