Kontakt X:X | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2026.026
Decision-making processes of nurses in clinical practice and their relationship with work motivation and perceived work effectivenessNursing - Original article
- University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Goal: This study aims to analyse the level of nurses' involvement in decision-making processes in clinical practice, and to identify the connections between job position, decision-making opportunities, and selected work characteristics, especially work motivation, subjectively perceived work effectiveness, and attitude towards organisational change.
Methods: The study employed a quantitative design and a questionnaire survey. The research instrument was a self-administered questionnaire containing 23 items focused on decision-making competencies, work motivation, and perception of the work environment. The questionnaire was distributed among non-medical healthcare workers in the Czech Republic. 315 fully completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. The data were analysed using the Pearson chi-square test. The effect size was expressed using Cramer's V coefficient.
Results: A statistically significant relationship was found between job position and the possibility of participating in decision-making about the operation of the department or clinic (χ2 = 68.995; p < 0.001; V = 0.33). A statistically significant relationship was also identified between the possibility of decision-making and subjectively perceived work efficiency (χ2 = 15.755; p = 0.003; V = 0.16), and between the possibility of decision-making and the way of accepting organisational changes.
Conclusion: The results suggest that nurses' involvement in decision-making processes is related to their work perceptions and approach to organisational change. Promoting participative management can improve the work environment in healthcare organisations.
Keywords: Autonomy; Decision-making process; Healthcare management; Nurse; Work motivation
Conflicts of interest:
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Received: December 1, 2025; Revised: March 1, 2026; Accepted: April 20, 2026; Prepublished online: April 21, 2026
References
- Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede K, Sermeus W; RN4CAST Consortium (2017). Nurses' reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe. Int J Nurs Stud 50(2): 143-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.009.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Benner P, Tanner C, Chesla C (2009). Expertise in nursing practice: caring, clinical judgment and ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Pub., 528 p.
Go to original source... - Davenport T, Kalakota, R (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Health J 6(2): 94-98. DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Doraiswamy PM, Blease C, Bodner K (2019). Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Insights from a global physician survey. Artif Intell Med 102: 101753. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101753.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Havaei F, Ji XR, Boamah SA (2022). Workplace predictors of quality and safe patient care delivery among nurses using machine learning techniques. J Nurs Care Qual 37(3): 232-241. DOI: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000600.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Hoffman KA, Aitken LM, Duffield C (2009). A comparison of novice and expert nurses' cue collection during clinical decision-making: Verbal protocol analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 46(10): 1335-1344. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.001.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Johansen ML, O'Brien JL (2016). Decision making in nursing practice: A concept analysis. Nurs Forum 51(1): 40-48. DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12119.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Manojlovich M (2010). Nurse/physician communication through a sensemaking lens: shifting the paradigm to improve patient safety. Med Care 48(11): 941-946. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181eb31bd.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Melin Johansson C, Palmqvist R, Rönnberg L (2017). Clinical intuition in the nursing process and decision making - A mixed studies review. J Clin Nurs 26(23-24): 3936-3949. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13814.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Nibbelink CW, Brewer BB (2018). Decision making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review. J Clin Nurs 27(5-6): 917-928. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14151.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Pretz JE, Folse VN (2011). Nursing experience and preference for intuition in decision making. J Clin Nurs 20(19-20): 2878-2889. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365 2702.2011.03705.x.
Go to original source... - Rabben J, Fossum M, Vivat B, Rohde GE (2026). Nurses' perceptions of their involvement in shared decision making for advanced cancer treatment and palliative care: A qualitative interview study. J Adv Nurs 82(1): 719-731. DOI: 10.1111/jan.16994.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - Tanner CA (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research based model of clinical judgment in nursing. J Nurs Educ 45(6): 204-211. DOI: 10.3928/01484834 20060601 04.
Go to original source... - Tun HM, Rahman HA, Naing L, Malik OA (2025). Trust in artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems among health care workers: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 27: e69678. DOI: 10.2196/69678.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed... - White KM, Dudley Brown S, Terhaar MF (Eds) (2016). Translation of Evidence into Nursing and Health Care. New York: Springer, 472 p.
Go to original source... - WHO (2020). State of the World's Nursing 2020: Investing in Education, Jobs and Leadership. Geneva, 116 p. [online] [cit. 2026-01-22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003279
- Wong CA, Cummings GG, Ducharme L (2013). The relationship between nursing leadership practices and patient outcomes: a systematic review update. J Nurs Manag 21(5): 709-724. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12116.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


ORCID...