Kontakt X:X | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2026.026

Decision-making processes of nurses in clinical practice and their relationship with work motivation and perceived work effectivenessNursing - Original article

Helena Svobodová *, Sylva Bártlová ORCID...
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Goal: This study aims to analyse the level of nurses' involvement in decision-making processes in clinical practice, and to identify the connections between job position, decision-making opportunities, and selected work characteristics, especially work motivation, subjectively perceived work effectiveness, and attitude towards organisational change.

Methods: The study employed a quantitative design and a questionnaire survey. The research instrument was a self-administered questionnaire containing 23 items focused on decision-making competencies, work motivation, and perception of the work environment. The questionnaire was distributed among non-medical healthcare workers in the Czech Republic. 315 fully completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. The data were analysed using the Pearson chi-square test. The effect size was expressed using Cramer's V coefficient.

Results: A statistically significant relationship was found between job position and the possibility of participating in decision-making about the operation of the department or clinic (χ2 = 68.995; p < 0.001; V = 0.33). A statistically significant relationship was also identified between the possibility of decision-making and subjectively perceived work efficiency (χ2 = 15.755; p = 0.003; V = 0.16), and between the possibility of decision-making and the way of accepting organisational changes.

Conclusion: The results suggest that nurses' involvement in decision-making processes is related to their work perceptions and approach to organisational change. Promoting participative management can improve the work environment in healthcare organisations.

Keywords: Autonomy; Decision-making process; Healthcare management; Nurse; Work motivation
Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Received: December 1, 2025; Revised: March 1, 2026; Accepted: April 20, 2026; Prepublished online: April 21, 2026 

Download citation

References

  1. Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, Van den Heede K, Sermeus W; RN4CAST Consortium (2017). Nurses' reports of working conditions and hospital quality of care in 12 countries in Europe. Int J Nurs Stud 50(2): 143-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Benner P, Tanner C, Chesla C (2009). Expertise in nursing practice: caring, clinical judgment and ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Pub., 528 p. Go to original source...
  3. Davenport T, Kalakota, R (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Health J 6(2): 94-98. DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Doraiswamy PM, Blease C, Bodner K (2019). Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Insights from a global physician survey. Artif Intell Med 102: 101753. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.101753. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Havaei F, Ji XR, Boamah SA (2022). Workplace predictors of quality and safe patient care delivery among nurses using machine learning techniques. J Nurs Care Qual 37(3): 232-241. DOI: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000600. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Hoffman KA, Aitken LM, Duffield C (2009). A comparison of novice and expert nurses' cue collection during clinical decision-making: Verbal protocol analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 46(10): 1335-1344. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Johansen ML, O'Brien JL (2016). Decision making in nursing practice: A concept analysis. Nurs Forum 51(1): 40-48. DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12119. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Manojlovich M (2010). Nurse/physician communication through a sensemaking lens: shifting the paradigm to improve patient safety. Med Care 48(11): 941-946. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181eb31bd. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Melin Johansson C, Palmqvist R, Rönnberg L (2017). Clinical intuition in the nursing process and decision making - A mixed studies review. J Clin Nurs 26(23-24): 3936-3949. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13814. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Nibbelink CW, Brewer BB (2018). Decision making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review. J Clin Nurs 27(5-6): 917-928. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14151. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Pretz JE, Folse VN (2011). Nursing experience and preference for intuition in decision making. J Clin Nurs 20(19-20): 2878-2889. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365 2702.2011.03705.x. Go to original source...
  12. Rabben J, Fossum M, Vivat B, Rohde GE (2026). Nurses' perceptions of their involvement in shared decision making for advanced cancer treatment and palliative care: A qualitative interview study. J Adv Nurs 82(1): 719-731. DOI: 10.1111/jan.16994. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Tanner CA (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research based model of clinical judgment in nursing. J Nurs Educ 45(6): 204-211. DOI: 10.3928/01484834 20060601 04. Go to original source...
  14. Tun HM, Rahman HA, Naing L, Malik OA (2025). Trust in artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems among health care workers: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 27: e69678. DOI: 10.2196/69678. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. White KM, Dudley Brown S, Terhaar MF (Eds) (2016). Translation of Evidence into Nursing and Health Care. New York: Springer, 472 p. Go to original source...
  16. WHO (2020). State of the World's Nursing 2020: Investing in Education, Jobs and Leadership. Geneva, 116 p. [online] [cit. 2026-01-22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003279
  17. Wong CA, Cummings GG, Ducharme L (2013). The relationship between nursing leadership practices and patient outcomes: a systematic review update. J Nurs Manag 21(5): 709-724. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12116. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.