Kontakt 2005, 7(1-2):157-159 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2005.031

Some health and ethical aspects of the circumsionBiomedicine

Radovan Boča1,*, Libuša Radková2, Ladislav Šoltés3
1 Fakultná nemocnica s poliklinikou, chirurgická klinika, Trnava
2 Trnavská univerzita, Fakulta zdravotníctva a sociálnej práce, katedra dobrovolníctva
3 Slovenská zdravotnícka univerzita, katedra medicínskej etiky a bioetiky

The authors consider certain aspects of the circumcision in men. They emphasize the fact that at the beginning, the circumcision was understood as a religious, ritual action, however, the reasons for the circumcision in men stepwise varied and the medical standpoint started to prevail. This occurred when the implementation of the circumcision passed to hands of trained specialists - physicians. The reasons for as well as against the circumcision are ever at a level of polemics and their persistence is rather traditional. However, when a man decides to undergo the circumcision, who is quite competent with respect to his behavior, or when the circumcision is indicated due to strictly medical reasons (e. g. phimosis), then its implementation is quite acceptable. The authors, however, do not agree with routine circumcision of newborns based on request of their parents. According to the author, the decision about the implementation of the surgery in this age should be exclusively based on the physician opinion.

Keywords: circumcision in men; ritual; sexuality

Published: June 29, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Boča R, Radková L, Šoltés L. Some health and ethical aspects of the circumsion. Kontakt. 2005;7(1-2):157-159. doi: 10.32725/kont.2005.031.
Download citation

References

  1. Genezis, in: Biblia, písmo sväté Starej a Novej zmluvy. Tranoscius, Liptovský Mikuláš 1978, 1. vyd, s. 13
  2. Samuel, 1. kniha, in: Biblia, písmo sväté Starej a Novej zmluvy. Tranoscius, Liptovský Mikuláš 1978, 1. vyd, s. 254
  3. Websters Universal Dictionary and Thesaurus. New Lanark, Scotland: Geddes and Grosset Ltd, 1993, 1. vyd., s. 112
  4. Szasz, T. H. 1996: Neonatal Circumcision: Symbol of the Birth of the Therapeutic State. Journal of med. and philosophy, 21, č. 2, s. 137 - 148 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Moses, S. 1994: The Association Between Lack of Male Circumcision and Risk for the HIV Infection: A Review of the Epidemiological Data. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 21, č. 4, s. 201-210 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Cook, L. S. et al. 1994: Circumcision and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Am. J. of Oubl. Health, 84, č. 2, s. 197-201 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Hunter, D. 1994: Sexual Behavior, Sexually Transmitted Diseas: Male Circumcision and Risk of HIV Infection among Women in Nairobi. AIDS, 8, s. 93 - 99 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Tyndall, M. W. 1996: Increased Risk of Infection With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Typ 1 Among Uncircumcised Men Presenting With Genital Ulcer Disease in Kenya. Clin. Infect. Dis., 23 (3), s. 449 - 453 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Urassa, M. 1997: Male Circumcision and Susceptibility to HIV Infection among Men in Tanzania. AIDS, 11, s. 73 - 80 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Lavreys, L. 1999: Effect of Circumcision on Incidence immunodeficiency Virus. Jour. of Inf, Dis., 180, s. 330 - 336 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...