Kontakt 2007, 9(2):296-303 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2007.046
Current trends in examination of undesirable events in the health service systemHealth and Social Sciences
- Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava, Interní klinika
- Ostravská univerzita, Zdravotně sociální fakulta, Ústav fyziologie a patofyziologie
The main target of examination of failures in providing the health care is prevention of repeating undesirable events. Two approaches are possible in the examination of failures: personal and systemic approaches, where each of them employs a different method and presents different starting points for the solution of the failure. Understanding of differences between the two approaches mentioned is of a considerable practical importance. The more frequently used personal approach puts emphasize on the failure itself and the systemic approach is focused on formation of protective barriers against all the risks in providing the health care. Most failures in providing the health care have their individual and institutional levels. The failure is usually caused by a non-standard procedure performed by a healthcare professional on the one hand, and by supporting factors on the other. In the course of the examination, the damaged patient should be provided with an extraordinary and complex care, but the specific support of relevant healthcare professionals can also be necessary. The systemic approach to solving undesirable events is ethically more advantageous from the standpoint of patients as well as healthcare professionals and management since it offers a complex prevention of repeating the failure.
Keywords: Undesirable events in health service system; examination of undesirable events; ethical aspects
Received: September 19, 2007; Accepted: October 30, 2007; Published: December 21, 2007 Show citation
References
- BLENDON, R. J. et al.: Views of practising physicians and the public on medical errors. New England Journal of Medicine, Boston: 2002. Vol. 347, no. 24, s. 1933-40.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- BERWICK, D.: Errors today and errors tomorrow. New England Journal of Medicine, Boston: 2003. Vol. 348, no 25, s. 2570-2572.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- BRENNAN, T. A.: The institute of medicine report on medical errors - could it do harm? New England Journal of Medicine, Boston: 2000. Vol 342, no 15, s. 1123-25.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- BRENNAN, T. A. et al.: Accidental deaths, saved lives and improved quality. New England Jouranl of Medicine, Boston: 2005. Vol. 353, no 13, s. 1405-1409.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- GABA, M. D., HOWARD, S. K.: Fatigue among clinicians and the safety of patients. New England Journal of Medicine, Boston: 2002. Vol. 347, no 16, s. 1249-1255.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- KOHN, L. T., CORRIGAN, J. M., DONALDSON, M. S.: eds. To err is human: building a safer health system. 1. ed. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press, 2000, s. 22-48.
- SEXTON, J. B., THOMAS, J., HELMREICH, B.: Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. British Medical Journal, London: 2000. Vol. 320, s. 745-749.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- VINCENT, C. A. et. al.: Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. British Medical Journal, London:2000. Vol. 316, s. 1154-1157.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- VINCENT, C. A.: Understanding and responding to adverse events. New England Journal of Medicine, Boston: 2003. Vol. 348, no 11, s. 1051-1056.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- VINCENT, C. A.: Analysis of clinical incidents: a window on the system not a search for root causes. Quality and Safety in Health Care, Standford: 2004, Vol. 13, s. 242-243.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- WU, A. W.: Medical error: the second victim: the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. British Medical Journal, London: 2000. Vol. 320, s. 726-727.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...