Kontakt 2012, 14(3):353-361 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2012.037

Adaptation process in ecological perspective of seniorsHealth and Social Sciences - Original article

Jana Levická
Trnavská univerzita v Trnave, Fakulta zdravotníctva a sociálnej práce, katedra sociálnej práce Univerzita Hradec Králové, Ústav sociální práce

Based on the ecological perspective, we can understand sudden changes in the health condition and associated requirements for position in the year-round inclusion of seniors as a situation, in which all the three causes are accumulated referred to by authors as possible reasons for the maladaptation (Germain, Bloom, 1991; Germain, Gitterman, 2011). The examination of effects on the client due to this cluster of causes is tedious, but it is unavoidable. Within the framework of a specific research 5/2011 "Process of adaptation of seniors to their life under the institutional care", I attempted to acquire data which could make it possible not only to improve understanding the client (man or women) in the course of the adaptation process, but also to determine whether the ecological perspective can bring a contribution to better understanding of his/her adaptation process. In my contribution, I mention only partial results of this research project concerning the research examination implemented in institutions for seniors in Slovakia.
Given the target, I chose a qualitative research strategy, particularly design of an illustrative case study (Yin, 2003; Zainal, 2007). In the research work designed in this way, the investigator works with a minimum number of cases examined, which makes him/her possible to consider problems from different points of view. The research sample consisted of two seniors (a men aged 82 years and women aged 76 years), who were clients of the institution and in the course of our research, they were subjected to the adaptation process, two social workers, two nurses and members of families of the seniors. In one case, this was a daughter and son-in-law of the female client, and in the second case, this was a son and grand-daughter of the male client.
The results acquired demonstrated relationships between the social role played by the male senior/female senior in the previous period and success of the adaptation itself. The data obtained simultaneously indicate possibilities brought into the social work practice just by the ecological approach.

Keywords: adaptation process; ecological perspective; qualitative research; seniors; social work

Received: March 22, 2012; Accepted: July 19, 2012; Published: September 27, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Levická J. Adaptation process in ecological perspective of seniors. Kontakt. 2012;14(3):353-361. doi: 10.32725/kont.2012.037.
Download citation

References

  1. Compton BR, Gallavay B (1984). Social work processes. 3rd ed. Hemewood, IL: Dorsey Press. 326 p.
  2. Garbarino J (1990). The Human Ecology of Early Risk. In: Maisels SJ, Shankoff JP (eds.): Handbook for Early Childhood Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 78-96.
  3. Germain CB, Bloom M (1991). Human behavior in the social environment: An ecological view. 1st ed. New York: Columbia University Press. 543 p.
  4. Germain CB, Gitterman A (2008). Life Model of Social Work Practice. 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press. 632 p.
  5. Germain CB, Gitterman A (2011). Ecological Perspective. [online]. [cit. 2011. 07.15]. Dostupné na: http://www.uncp.edu/home/marson/348_ecological.html
  6. Hollis F (1964). Casework: a psychosocial therapy. 1st ed. New York: Random House. 300 p.
  7. Hollstein-Brinkmann H (1993). Soziale Arbeit und Systemtheorien. 1. Aufl. Freiburg im Breisgau: Lambertus. 221 p.
  8. Levická J (2002). Teoretické aspekty sociálnej práce. 1. vyd. Trnava: ProSocio. 283 s.
  9. Levická J (2005). Od konceptu k technike. 1. vyd. Trnava: Vydavateľstvo TŠ pre Spoločnosť pre podporu vedy a vzdelávania na FZaSP TU. 222 s.
  10. Levická J a kol. (2007). Sociálna práca I. 1. vyd. Trnava: Oľga Váryová, edícia ProSocio. 168 s.
  11. Lüssi P (1998). Systemische Sozialarbeit. Praktisches Lehrbuch der Sozialberatung. 4. durchges. Aufl. Bern-Stuttgart-Wien: Veralg Paul Haupt. 501 p.
  12. Matoušek O a kol. (2001). Základy sociální práce. 1. vyd. Praha: Portál. 309 s.
  13. Sheafor BW, Horejsi ChR, Horejsi GA (2000). Techniques and guidelines for social worker practice. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn&Bacon. 628 p.
  14. Švaříček R, Šeďová K a kol. (2007). Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách. 1. vyd. Praha: Portál. 340 s.
  15. Thiersch H (2006): Die Erfahrung der Wirklichkeit. Perspektiven einer alltagsorietntierten Sozialpedagogik. 2. Aufl. Weinheim & München: Juventa. 253 s.
  16. Trevithick P (2006). Social work skills a praxtice handbook. 2nd ed. Berkshire: Open University Press. 340 p.
  17. Wendt WR (1990). Oekosozial denken und handeln. Grundlagen und Anwendlungen in Sozialarbeit. Freiburg im Breisgau: Lambertus. 232 p.
  18. Wendt WR (1995). Soziale Arbeit im Wandel ihres Selbstverständnisses. Beruf und Identität. Lambertus-Verlag, Freiburg i. Br.: Lambertus-Verlag. 172 p.
  19. Wendt WR (2004). Sozial arbeiten und sozial wirtschaften. Freiburg: Lambertus Verlag. 216 p.
  20. Yin RK (2003). Case study research: Design and Methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks,CA, Sage Publications. 192 p.
  21. Zainal Z (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan. 9: 1-6. ISSN 1675-1930.