Kontakt 2016, 18(2):e84-e89 | DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2016.05.003

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Visual Analog Sleep ScaleOšetřovatelství - původní práce

Funda Çetinkayaa, Nezihe Karabulutb,*
a Aksaray University, Health High School, Department of Surgical Nursing, Aksaray, Turkey
b Atatürk University, The Faculty oh Health Science, Department of Surgical Nursing, Erzurum, Turkey

Objectives: The aim of this study was to adapt the English version of the Visual Analog Sleep Scale (VAS Scale) to Turkish, and to assess the validity and reliability of this Turkish version.

Material and methods: The study design was both descriptive and methodological. The study group was comprised of 75 patients, who agreed to participate in the study. Each had received total hip replacement surgery in an orthopedic clinical hospital. Data was collected using a Turkish translation of the VAS Scale. Psychometric testing of the adapted instrument was carried out to establish internal consistency, interim correlation, and construct validity. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Barlett's tests were applied to determine the sampling adequacy and suitability to the factor analysis.

Results: The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was found to be 0.89, and this value indicates suitability for principal component analysis. Similarly, Barlett's test results (X2 = 608.74, p = 0.000) also indicate the interrelationships of the data and suitability for the factor analysis. The eigenvalue of the VAS Scale reduced to 10 items was found to be 6.65 and the variance was 66.52. The VAS Scale Cronbach's alpha was 0.82 for the test items. The test-retest stability coefficient (validity of the scale) was 0.92. Alpha coefficient was found to be 0.94 for internal consistency.

Conclusion: The original VAS Scale consisted of three sub-scales and 15 items, whereas the Turkish version has one dimension and 10 items. The Turkish version of the VAS Scale adapted to the orthopedics clinic can be used as a one-factor tool.

Klíčová slova: Sleep; Quality; Reliability; Validity

Vloženo: 25. březen 2016; Revidováno: 29. duben 2016; Přijato: 17. květen 2016; Zveřejněno: 27. červen 2016  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Çetinkaya F, Karabulut N. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Visual Analog Sleep Scale. Kontakt. 2016;18(2):e84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2016.05.003.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Şenol V, Soyuer F, Pekşen Akça R, Argün M. The sleep quality in adolescents and the factors that affect it. Kocatepe Medical Journal 2012;14:93-102.
    2. Gordon M. Manual of nursing diagnosis. 12th ed. Sudbry: Jones and Barlett Publishers; 2009, p. 259-71.
    3. Potter PA, Perry AG. Sleep in fundamentals of nursing revised. 4th ed. Canada: Mosby; 2010, p. 1028-51.
    4. Ye L, Keane K, Johnson SH, Dykes PC. How do clinicians assess, communicate about, and manage patient sleep in the hospital? J Nurs Adm 2013;43: 342-7. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    5. Hoey LM, Fulbrook P, Douglas JA. Sleep assessment of hospitalised patients: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2014;51:1281-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    6. Önler E, Yilmaz A. The Sleep Quality of the Patients in Surgical Units. İstanbul University Florance Nightingale Journal of Nursing 2008;16(62):114-21.
    7. Yilmaz M, Sayin Y, Gurler H. Sleep quality of hospitalized patients in surgical units. Nursing Forum 2012;47:183-92. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    8. Yilmaz E, Kutlu AK, Çeçen D. The factors those affect sleeping status of the patients hospitalized in surgical clinics. New Journal of Medicine 2008;25:149-56.
    9. Setaro J. Obstructive sleep apnea: a standard of care that works. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 2012;27:323-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    10. Lee SA, Han SH, Uk Ryu H. Anxiety and its relationship to quality of life independent of depression in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Psychosomatic Research 2015;79:32-6. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    11. Tranmer JE, Minard J, Fox LA, Rebelo L. The sleep experience of medical and surgical patients. Clin Nurs Res 2003;12:159-73. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    12. Frighetto L, Marra C, Bandali S, Wilbur K, Naumann T, Jewesson P. An assessment of quality of sleep and the use of drugs with sedating properties in hospitalized adult patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2004;17:1-10. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    13. Bergamasco EC, da Cruz Dde A. Adaptation of the Visual Analog Sleep Scales to Portuguese. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem 2007;15(5):998-1004. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    14. Çölbay M, Yüksel Ş, Acartürk G, Uslan İ, Karaman Ö. Sleep quality in hemodialysis patients with restless leg syndrome. General Journal of Medical 2007;17:35-41.
    15. Güneş Z, Körükçü Ö, Özdemir G. The determination of the quality of sleep of the patients with diabetes mellitus. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences 2009;12:10-17.
    16. Çinar S, Olgun N. Determining of fatigue and sleep disturbance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Nurs Sci 2010;2:24-31.
    17. Verran J, Snyder-Halpern R. Do patients sleep in the hospital? Applied Nursing Research 1988;1(2):95. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    18. Gözüm S, Aksayan S. A guide for transcultural scale adaptation, II: Psychometric characteristics and cross-cultur a comparisons. HEMAR-G 2005;4:9-20.
    19. Atilgan H. Validity reliability, educational measurement and evaluation Print, Ankara, Turkey: Ani Publishing; 2009, p. 37-43.
    20. Yang QQ, Liu HX, Yang CL, Ji SY, Li L. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale. Int J Nurs Sci 2014;23-7. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    21. Yue Y, Liu R, Lu J, Wang X, Zhang S, Wu A, et al. Reliability and validity of a new post-stroke depression scale in Chinese population. Journal of Affective Disorders 2015;174:317-23. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    22. Kim JS, Chu DY, Jeon HS. Reliability and validity of the L test in participants with chronic stroke. Physiotherapy 2015;101:161-5. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    23. Zhang S, Shang Y, Peng X, Xie H, Liu H. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CAHS among renal transplant recipients. Int J Nurs Sci 2010;5:1-6. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    24. Polit DF, Beck C. In essentials of nursing research methods, appraisal, and utilization 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 2005, p. 597-607.
    25. Şencan H. Reliability and validity in social and behavioral measurement Ankara, Turkey: Seckin Publishing; 2005, p. 384.
    26. Özdamar K. Statistical data analysis by means of packet programmes. 5th ed. Eskişehir, Turkey: Anadolu University Press; 2004, p. 661-73.
    27. AEgisdóttir S, Gerstein LH, Çinarbas D. Methodological issues in cross-cultural counseling research: equivalence, bias, and translations. The Counseling Psychologist 2008;36:188-219. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. Pett MA, Lackey NK, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. California: Sage Publications; 2003, p. 77-79. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    29. Aksayan S, Gözüm S. A guide for transcultural scale adaptation, I Scale adaptation and language adaptation of the stage. HEMAR-G 2002;4:1-20.
    30. Büyüköztürk Ş. Data analysis book let for social sciences. 10th ed. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Publishing; 2009.
    31. Karasar N. Research methods. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Publishing Ltd. Şti; 2014, p. 136-53.
    32. Erefe I. The quality of data collecting instruments. In: Erefe I. (ed.). Research, principle, process, and methods in nursing. Istanbul, Turkey: Odak Press; 2002, p. 169-88.

    Zpět na obsah