Kontakt 2018, 20(1):e63-e71 | DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.09.009

The concept of control from the perspective of social work clientsSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Radka Janebová*, Zuzana Truhlářová
Univerzita Hradec Králové, Filozofická fakulta, Ústav sociální práce, Hradec Králové, Česká republika

Social work can be seen as an ambivalent profession, the mission of which is to provide people with assistance as well as exercise a degree of control over them. Although dealing with the area of control in terms of human rights violations entails some risks, the field appears to be less conceptualized in the literature than the provision of aid. The present article attempts to address this deficit from the point of view of social work clients, with its aim being to present a hypothesis concerning what conceptions of control can be found within clients as well as to define the key aspects of these individual concepts. A qualitative content analysis of foreign and Czech professional sources was undertaken to achieve the goal.
Three concepts regarding clients' perception of control have been found, all of which have been found to have an inclusive logical relationship to each other. The article presents a hypothesis of three different levels of control perception - from the broadest concept of control (such as unsolicited or even unwanted social worker behaviours), through a narrower concept of control (such as a limited freedom of choice), and finally toward a specific concept of control as the mandated use of a service.
If the given hypothesis is confirmed in the research, it might also be useful to consider the relationships among the different levels of control in terms of their exclusivity (i.e. whether clients fall into one or more categories) or the variability among levels which depend on diverse factors. This implies the question of what variables are involved and how they correlate with the individual levels of perceived control. Given that the present thesis was created in the field of social work as a practical profession, the question emerges as to the application level of the presented findings, an aspect which is dealt with briefly in the paper's conclusion.

Keywords: Social work; Control; Self-determination; Motivation; Participation

Received: July 18, 2017; Revised: August 22, 2017; Accepted: September 26, 2017; Published: March 26, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Janebová R, Truhlářová Z. The concept of control from the perspective of social work clients. Kontakt. 2018;20(1):e63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.09.009.
Download citation

References

  1. Banks S. Ethics and values in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2001.
  2. IFSW. Statement of ethical principles. 2012. [online] [cit. 2016-12-06]. Dostupné z: http://ifsw.org/policies/statement-of-ethical-principles/
  3. Jupp V. Issues of power in social work practice in mental health services for people from Black and minority ethnic groups. Critical Social Work 2005;6(1). Go to original source...
  4. Trotter Ch, Ward T. Involuntary clients, pro-social modelling and ethics. Ethics and Social Welfare 2013;7(1):74-90. Go to original source...
  5. Úlehla I. Umění pomáhat. Praha: SLON; 1999.
  6. van der Laan G. Otázky legitimace sociální práce. Boskovice: Albert, Ostrava: Zdravotně sociální fakulta Ostravské univerzity; 1998.
  7. Clark Ch. Social Work Ethics. Politics, Prinicples and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2000. Go to original source...
  8. Kolektiv autorů. Ilustrovaný encyklopedický slovník. Praha: Academia 1981.
  9. Johnson LC. Social work practice: a generalist approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1998.
  10. Dalrymple J, Burke B. Anti-oppressive social care and law. New York: Open University Press; 2006.
  11. Howe, D. Social workers and their practice in welfare bureaucracies. Aldershot: Gower; 1986.
  12. Berg IK. Family preservation. London: BT Press; 1991. (český překlad od Ivana Úlehly).
  13. Behroozi CS. A model for social work with involuntary applicants in groups. Social Work with Groups 1993;15(2-3):223-38. Go to original source...
  14. Hill A. Working in statutory contexts. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2010.
  15. Janebová R. Teorie a metody sociální práce - reflexivní přístup. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus; 2014.
  16. Musil L. "Ráda bych vám pomohla, ale...". Dilemata práce s klienty v organizacích. Brno: Marek Zeman; 2004.
  17. Kopřiva K. Lidský vztah jako součást profese. Praha: Portál; 1997.
  18. Burman S. Revisiting the agent of social control role: implications for substance abuse treatment. Journal of Social Work Practice 2004;18(2):197-209. Go to original source...
  19. Akademikerförbundet SSR. Ethics in Social Work - A code of conduct and ethical behaviour for social workers; 2015. [online] [cit. 2016-12-08]. Dostupné z: https://akademssr.se/sites/default/files/files/ethics_in_social_work_0.pdf
  20. Dubois B, Miley KK. Social work: An empowering profession. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1999.
  21. Thompson N. Promoting equality. Working with diversity and difference. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
  22. CASW. Code of Ethics; 2005. [online] [cit. 2016-12-08]. Dostupné z: http://www.casw-acts.ca/sites/default/files/attachements/CASW_Code%20of%20Ethics.pdf
  23. Miley KK, O'Melia MW, DuBois BL. Generalist social work practice: an empowering approach. Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon; 2011.
  24. Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1969;35(4):216-24. Go to original source...
  25. Haken R, Havlín F, Marek O, Mička P, Nawrath M, Vachůnová Z. Metodika participace aneb jak zapojit občany do rozhodování. Praha: Agora CE; 2016.
  26. Creative Commons. Participation Models - Citizens, Youth, Online: a chase through the maze; 2012. [online] [cit. 2017-06-18]. Dostupné z: http://www.nonformality.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Participation-Models-20110703.pdf
  27. O'Sullivan T. Decision-making in social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 1999. Go to original source...
  28. Dolgoff R, Harrington D, Lowenberg FM. Ethical decisions for social work practice. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole publishing; 2012.
  29. Willshire D, Brodsky SL. Toward a taxonomy of unwillingness: Initial steps in engaging the unwilling client. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 2001;8(2): 154-60. Go to original source...
  30. van Hal L, Meershoek A, Nijhuis F, Horstman K. A sociological perspective on "the unmotivated client": public accountability and professional work methods in vocational rehabilitation. Disability & Rehabilitation 2013;35(10):809-18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Trotter Ch. Working with involuntary clients: a guide to practice. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin Pty Ltd.; 2006.
  32. AASW. Code of Ethics; 2010. [online] [cit. 2016-12-08]. Dostupné z: https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/1201
  33. Janebová R. Když je klientem muž... In: Smutek M, Kappl M (Eds.). Proměny klienta služeb sociální práce - Social work client metamorphoses. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus 2006;317-36.
  34. Bowl R. Men and community care. In: Christie A (Ed.). Men and social work: theories and practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2001;109-125. Go to original source...
  35. Christie A. Gendered discourses of welfare, men and social work. In: Christie A (Ed.). Men and social work: theories and practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2001;7-34. Go to original source...
  36. Phillips N. Men and mental health: a view from social work practice. In: Christie A (Ed.). Men and social work: theories and practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2001; 126-46. Go to original source...
  37. Kochanová M. Rizika práce s lidmi při fúzích a akvizicích. (Bakalářská práce). Brno: Ekonomicko-správní fakulta MU; 2010.
  38. de Swaan A. The management of normality: critical essays in health and welfare. London: Routledge; 2009.
  39. Červenka K. Proto-profesionalizace klientů pomáhajících profesí: Příklad klientů preventivně výchovného zařízení. In: Truhlářová Z, Levická K (Eds). Od teorie k praxi, od praxe k teorii. Sborník z konference VIII Hradecké dny sociální práce. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus 2011;570-6.
  40. Mol A. The logic of Care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008. Go to original source...