Kontakt 2019, 21(4):344-351 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2019.032

Physical disabilities in nursing - the use of selected tools to monitor physically disabled patients' needsNursing - Review article

Jan Neugebauer *, Valérie Tóthová
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Introduction: The multidisciplinary concept of physical disability (in comparison with other disabilities, such as mental or social) is considered less problematic. In nursing, we can point out many variables (incontinence, a higher risk of decubitus ulcers, spasticity, etc.) whose combination can be called physical disability. Goal: The goal of this study is to map selected evaluation and measuring tools that can be applied in the assessment of physically disabled patients' needs.

Methods: This review study was carried out to map selected evaluating tools for the assessment of physically disabled patients' needs. The data were gained from academic databases of Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, Science Direct, Ebsco and Pubmed between 2015 and 2019. After the classification by the established criteria, we identified 12 relevant sources.

Results: We found 5 possibly relevant tools for the assessment of physically disabled patients' needs. The specific tools were WHODAS 2.0, MDS, MDS-BV, SDS and ICF.

Conclusions: All identified tools can be used for the assessment of physically disabled patients and are suitable for implementation in clinical practice. It was necessary to carry out this study in the Czech clinical practice to learn the effectiveness, usefulness, validity, reliability, specifics and sensitivity of selected tools.

Keywords: Model Disability Sheehan Disability Scale; Model Disability Survey - Brief version; Nursing; Survey; The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; Physical disability; WHODAS 2.0

Received: March 28, 2019; Accepted: August 11, 2019; Prepublished online: September 26, 2019; Published: December 13, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Neugebauer J, Tóthová V. Physical disabilities in nursing - the use of selected tools to monitor physically disabled patients' needs. Kontakt. 2019;21(4):344-351. doi: 10.32725/kont.2019.032.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Almazán-Isla J, Comín-Comín M, Damián J, Alcalde-Cabero E, Ruiz C, Franco E, et al. (2014). Analysis of disability using WHODAS 2.0 among the middle-aged and elderly in Cinco Villas, Spain. Disabil Health J7(1): 78-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.08.004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Alonso-Prieto E, Rubino C, Lucey C, Evans VC, Tam EM, Woo C, et al. (2019). Relationship between work functioning and self-reported cognitive complaints in patients with major depressive disorder treated with desvenlafaxine. Psychiatry Res 272: 144-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.062. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Arbuckle, R, Frye MA, Brecher M, Paulsson B, Rajagopalan K, Palmer S, et al. (2009). The psychometric validation of the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Rese 165(1-2): 163-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.11.018/. Go to original source...
    4. Bond S, Bond J (1982). A Delphi survey of clinical nursing research priorities. J Adv Nurs 7(6): 565-575. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1982.tb00277.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Bradley SEK, Schwandt HM, Khan S (2009). Levels, Trends, and Reasons for Contraceptive Discontinuation. DHSAnalytical Studies No. 20. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro.
    6. Carlozzi NE, Kratz AL, Downing NR, Goodnight S, Miner JA, Migliore N, et al. (2015). Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD). Qual Life Res 24(8): 1963-1971. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-0930-x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Castaneda L, Bergmann A, Bahia L (2014). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studies. Rev Bras Epidemiol 17(2): 437-451. DOI: 10.1590/1809-4503201400020012ENG. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Cieza A, Stucki G (2005). Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Qual Life Res14(5): 1225-1237. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-4773-0. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Čírtková L, Vitoušová P, et al. (2007). Pomoc obětem (a svědkům) trestných činů: příručka pro pomáhající profese. Praha: Grada.
    10. Chiu TY, Yen CF, Chou CH, Lin JD, Hwang AW, Liao HF, Chi WC (2014). Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36 - item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: Validity and reliability analyses. Res Dev Disabil35(11): 2812-2820. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Coles T, Coon Ch, DeMuro C, McLeod L, Gnanasakthy A (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the Sheehan Disability Scale in adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 10: 887-895. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S55220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Colicchia C, Strozzi F (2012). Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management 17(4): 403-418. DOI: 10.1108/13598541211246558. Go to original source...
    13. Collins JA, Fauser BC (2005). Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Hum Reprod Update11(2): 103-104. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmh058. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Ehrmann C, Prodinger B, Gmünder HP, Hug K, Bickenbach JE, Stucki G (2018) Describing functioning in people living with spinal cord injury in Switzerland - a graphical modelling approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99(10): 1965-1981. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.015. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Gold MD (2014). DSM-5 and the Assessment of Functioning: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 42(2): 173-181. Go to PubMed...
    16. Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. J Chiropr Med5(3): 101-117. DOI: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Gülpinar O, Güçlü AG (2014). How to write a review article? Turk J Urol 39(1): 44-48. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2013.054. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Hanková M, Vávrová S (2016). Partnerské vztahy: očima mladých dospělých s vrozeným tělesným postižením. Praha: Grada.
    19. Henderson V (1978). The concept of nursing. J Adv Nurs3(2): 113-130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1978.tb00837.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Hodgins DC (2013). Reliability and validity of the Sheehan disability scale modified for pathological gambling. BMC Psychiatry13: 177. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-177. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Hodgins DC, Williams R, Munro G. (2009). Work stress, workplace norms and alcohol problems among employed workers. Subst Use Misuse 44(14): 2062-2069. DOI: 10.3109/10826080902855173 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. IHIS CR (2018). WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). [online] [cit. 2019-03-19]. Available from: https://www.uzis.cz/katalog/klasifikace/WHODAS
    23. Kalnická V, Votinský J (2008). Výsledky šetření o zdravotně postižených osobách v České republice za rok 2007. Praha: ČSÚ.
    24. Kočová H, et al. (2017). Spinální svalová atrofie v souvislostech. Praha: Grada.
    25. Konecky B, Meyer EC, Marx BP, Kimbrel NA, Morissette SB (2014). Using the WHODAS 2.0 to assess functional disability associated with DSM-5 mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry171(8): 818-820. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14050587. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    26. Kučírek J (2017). Aplikovaná psychologie: vybraná témata: teleworking, leadership, sociálně psychologický výcvik. Praha: Grada.
    27. Leon AC, Olfson M, Potera L, Farber L, Sheehan DV (1997). Assessing Psychiatric Impairment in Primary Care with the Sheehan Disability Scale. Int J Psychiatry Med27(2): 93-105. DOI: 10.2190/T8EM-C8YH-373N-1UWD. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, MHADIE Consortium (2006). The definition of disability: what is in a name? Lancet368(9543): 1219-1221. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69498-1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Li K, Yan T, You L, Xie S, Li Y, Tang J, et al. (2016). The inter-rater reliability of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health set for spinal cord injury nursing. Int J Rehabil Res39(3): 240-248. DOI: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Lisowska B (2017). How to measure disability: survey usability versus usefulness. Development initiatives [online] [cit. 2019-02-15]. Available from: http://devinit.org/post/measure-disability-survey-usability-versus-usefulness/
    31. Loeb M (2016). Development of disability measures for surveys: the Washington group extended set on functioning. International Measurement of Disability 97-122. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28498-9_7. Go to original source...
    32. Lu SJ, Liou TH, Yen CF, Chang FH, Chen YL, Escorpizo R et al. (2018). Determinants of Employment Outcome for the People with Schizophrenia Using the WHODAS 2.0. J Occup Rehabil 29(2): 1-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-9794-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Lutz BJ, Bowers BJ (2003). Understanding How Disability is Defined and Conceptualized in the Literature. Rehabil Nurs28(3): 74-78. DOI: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2003.tb02037.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    34. Madans JH, Loeb ME, Altman BM (2011). Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics. BMC Public Health11(Suppl. 4): S4. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S4 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Nagaratnam K, Nagaratnam N (2019). Long-term care, nursing homes and support services. In: Nagaratnam K, Nagaratnam N, Cheuk, G (Eds). Advanced age geriatric care: A comprehensive guide. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 39-43. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96998-5_6. Go to original source...
    36. Newbert SL (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Manage J28(2): 121-146. DOI: 10.1002/smj.573. Go to original source...
    37. Opatřilová D, Zámečníková D (2007). Somatopedie: texty k distančnímu vzdělávání. Brno: Paido.
    38. Palmer M, Harley D (2012). Models and measurement in disability: an international review. Health Policy Plan27(5): 357-364. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czr047. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    39. Sabariego C, Oberhauser C, Posarac A, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, et al. (2015). Measuring disability: Comparing the impact of two data collection approaches on disability rates. Int J Environ Res Public Health12(9): 10329-10351. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120910329. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. Sanches-Ferreira M, Silveira-Maia M, Alves S, Simeonsson RJ (2018). Conditions for Implementing the ICF-CY in Education: The Experience in Portugal. Frontiers in Education3(20). DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00020. Go to original source...
    41. Sheehan D (1986). The anxiety disease: new hope for the millions who suffer from anxiety. Nex York: Bantam.
    42. Sheehan DV, Harnett-Sheehan K, Spann ME, Thompson HF, Prakash A (2011). Assessing remission in major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder clinical trials with the discan metric of the Sheehan disability scale. Int Clin Psychopharmacol26(2): 75-83. DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e328341bb5f. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    43. Sheehan KH, Sheehan DV (2008). Assessing treatment effects in clinical trials with the discan metric of the Sheehan Disability Scale. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 23(2): 70-83. DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f2b4d6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    44. Silva C, Coleta I, Silva AG, Amaro A, Alvarelhão J, Queirós A, Rocha N (2013). Adaptation and validation of WHODAS 2.0 in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Revista de Saúde Pública 47(4): 752-758. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004374. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    45. Silveira C, Souza RT, Costa ML, Parpinelli MA, Pacagnella RC, Ferreira EC, et al. (2018). Validation of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity. Int J Gynecol Obstet 141(Suppl. 1): 39-47. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12465. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    46. Simeonsson RJ, Leonardi M, Lillar D, Bjorck-Akesson E, Hollenweger J, Martinuzzi A (2009). Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to measure childhood disability. Disabil Rehabil 25(11-12): 602-610. DOI: 10.1080/0963828031000137117. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    47. Tatli HU, Köseoglu BF, Özcan DS, Akselim SK, Doğan A (2019). Validation and application of the international classification of functioning core set for spinal cord injury in the Turkish patients. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 65(10): 1-15. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2019.3045. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    48. Tranfield D, Denyer D Smart P (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3): 207-222. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375. Go to original source...
    49. Üstün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, et al. (2010). Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ 88(11): 815-823. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    50. WHO (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). [online] [cit. 2019-03-19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
    51. WHO (2013). WHO [online]. Geneva: WHO. [online] [cit. 2019-03-19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/whodasii/en/
    52. WHO (2017). Model Disability Survey. [online] [cit. 2019-03-19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/disabilities/data/mds/en/
    53. WHO (2019). Model disability survey. [online] [cit. 2019-03-19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/disabilities/data/mds/en/

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content