Kontakt 2023, 25(2):77-83 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2023.022

Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Insulin Delivery System Rating QuestionnaireNursing - Original article

Lenka Machálková1, *, Eva Reiterová1, Monika Durďáková1, Elena Gurková2
1 Palacký University in Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Olomouc, Czech Republic
2 University of Presov in Presov, Faculty of Health Care, Department of Nursing, Presov, Slovak Republic

Aim: The study deals with the linguistic validation and selected aspects (constructive validity and reliability) of the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire (IDSRQ).

Methods: The examined file consisted of 151 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The linguistic and content validation IDSRQ was performed, and the results of the questionnaire and individual subscales were processed via descriptive statistics and factor analysis.

Results: The data was used to calculate the reliability of seven original subscales (0.42-0.92). Construct validity was tested via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Models M1, M2 and M3, were created. For models M2 and M3, the significance of the chi-square test (p < 0.001) and FIT indices was calculated. The five-factor model with a reliability of 0.69-0.89 in subscales was identified as the best.

Conclusion: The new version of the questionnaire is in line with the psychometric properties of the original tool, and the extraction of items into a five-factor solution reflects the current assessment of patients' satisfaction with type 1 diabetes mellitus therapy in the Czech environment.

Keywords: Application insulin; Construct validity; Diabetes mellitus; Reliability
Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Received: February 8, 2023; Revised: May 12, 2023; Accepted: June 1, 2023; Prepublished online: June 15, 2023; Published: June 26, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Machálková L, Reiterová E, Durďáková M, Gurková E. Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire. Kontakt. 2023;25(2):77-83. doi: 10.32725/kont.2023.022.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bayrakdar A, Noureddine S, Farhood L, Nasrallah MP (2014). Comparison of quality of life in a group of Lebanese type 1 diabetics on insulin pump and those on multiple daily injections. J Med Liban 62(1): 22-26. DOI: 10.12816/0002623. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Coelho RCLA, Pagano A, Soares AN, Reis JS (2021). Brazilian version of "The Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire": translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arch Endocrinol Metab 64(6): 710-719. DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000274. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Creswell JW, Creswell JD (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative & mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE, 275 p.
    4. Hendl J, Remr J (2017). Metody výzkumu a evaluace. Praha: Portál, 372 p.
    5. Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic (2020). Zdravotnická ročenka České republiky 2019. Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky ČR. [online] [cit. 2023-01-22]. Available from: https://www.uzis.cz/index.php?pg=aktuality&aid=8560
    6. Kaiser HF (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39: 31-36. DOI: 10.1007/BF02291575. Go to original source...
    7. Kline RB (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press, New York, 427 p.
    8. Kruger DF, LaRue S, Estepa P (2015). Recognition of and steps to mitigate anxiety and fear of pain in injectable diabetes treatment. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 8: 49-56. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S71923. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Megari K (2013). Quality of Life in Chronic Disease Patients. Health Psychol Res 1(3): e27. DOI: 10.4081/hpr.2013.e27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Mehta SN, Tinsley LJ, Kruger D, Bode B, Layne JE, Huyett LM, et al. (2021). Improved Glycemic Control Following Transition to Tubeless Insulin Pump Therapy in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. Clin Diabetes 39(1): 72-79. DOI: 10.2337/cd20-0022. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Mesbah NI, Taha NA, Rahme ZN, Sukkar FF, Omar DM (2020). Experiences of Adults Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: A Qualitative Study. Med Princ Pract 29(3): 255-261. DOI: 10.1159/000503705. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Nair R, Kachan P (2017). Outcome tools for diabetes-specific quality of life: Study performed in a private family practice clinic. Can Fam Physician 63(6): e310-e315. Go to PubMed...
    13. Peyrot M, Rubin RR (2005). Validity and reliability of an instrument for assessing health-related quality of life and treatment preferences: the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire. Diabetes Care 28(1): 53-58. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.1.53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Kruger DF, Travis LB (2010). Correlates of insulin injection omission. Diabetes Care 33(2): 240-245. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1348. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 30(4): 459-467. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20199. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Prázný M, Rušavý Z, Šumník Z, Šoupal J, Petruželková L, Picková K, et al. (2019). Použití inzulínové pumpy a glukózových senzorů u pacientů s diabetem léčených inzulínem. Diabetologie, metabolismus, endokrinologie, výživa 22(4): 152-169. Go to original source...
    17. Siboni F, Alimoradi Z, Atashi V, Alipour M, Khatooni M (2019). Quality of Life in Different Chronic Diseases and Its Related Factors. Int J Prev Med 10(1): 65. DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_429_17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 17(2): 268-274. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, et al. (2022). IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 183: 109119. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Štechová K (2019). Léčba inzulinovou pumpou: edukace a její cíle. Vnitř Lék 65(4): 248-255. DOI: 10.36290/vnl.2019.042. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Todres L, Keen S, Kerr D (2010). Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in Type 1 diabetes: patient experiences of 'living with a machine'. Diabet Med 27(10): 1201-1204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03058.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods 3(1): 4-70. DOI: 10.1177/109442810031002. Go to original source...
    23. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. (2005). ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of Good Practice for theTranslation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health 8(2): 94-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Williams B, Onsman A, Brown T (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 8(3): 1-13. DOI: 10.33151/ajp.8.3.93. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content