Kontakt 2024, 26(1):77-82 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2024.013

Fulfilment of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the practice of Czech courtsSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Kateřina Cilečková1, *, Monika Chrenková1, Martin Kornel1, 2
1 University of Ostrava, Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Social Work, Ostrava, Czech Republic
2 Masaryk University, Faculty of Law, Department of Civil Law, Brno, Czech Republic; Attorney, Frank Bold Advokáti, s.r.o., Brno, Czech Republic

The aim of the project was to find out how the opinions of minor children are ascertained in proceedings in which they are participants, what techniques are used, and whether (and to what extent) the courts take the ascertained opinions into account when making decisions that affect the children's future life. The rights of children to adequate participation in court proceedings mainly results from the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The paper discusses how the child's opinion is ascertained depending on his or her age, the methods of ascertaining the child's opinion, including the specific techniques that may be used and, last but not least, the importance of ascertaining the child's opinion for the justification of the judgment. The results of the research show the crucial role of an authority of social and legal protection of children as a conflict guardian, and also point out that it's necessary to pay constant attention to the actual realization of the rights of minors. In the Czech Republic the determination of the opinions of minors is well anchored in the legislation, but reality does not always correspond to this.

Keywords: Decision-making practice of courts; Methods of ascertaining the child's opinion; Participation of minor children; Proceedings in matters concerning the custody of minors
Grants and funding:

This paper was written within the framework of the grant project entitled “Participation of Children in Child Custody Proceedings”, supported by the Czech Science Foundation (GACR), number GA20-12790S.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Received: July 20, 2023; Revised: January 23, 2024; Accepted: February 14, 2024; Prepublished online: March 7, 2024; Published: March 15, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cilečková K, Chrenková M, Kornel M. Fulfilment of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the practice of Czech courts. Kontakt. 2024;26(1):77-82. doi: 10.32725/kont.2024.013.
Download citation

References

  1. Birnbaum R, Saini MA (2012). Qualitative Synthesis of Children's Participation in Custody Disputes. Res Soc Work Pract 22(4): 400-409. DOI: 10.1177/1049731512442985. Go to original source...
  2. Bruning M (2020). Hear me! Improving child participation in family and child protection proceedings. [online] [cit. 2023-06-15]. Available from: https://www.leidenlawblog.nl/articles/hear-me-improving-child-participation-in-family-and-child-protection-proceedings
  3. Čamdžićová S (2021). Právo dítěte být slyšeno jako základní participační právo. Čas práv vědu praxi 29(1): 137-152. DOI: 10.5817/CPVP2021-1-6. Go to original source...
  4. Daly A (2010). The right of children to be heard in civil proceedings and the emerging law of the European Court of Human Rights. Int J Hum Rights 15(3): 441-461. DOI: 10.1080/13642980903542710. Go to original source...
  5. Fenton-Glynn C (2021). Children and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 283 p. Go to original source...
  6. Fernando M (2014). Family Law Proccedings and the Child's Right to be Heard in Australia, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Canada. Fam Court Rev 52(1): 46-59. DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12069. Go to original source...
  7. Fleming J (2013). Young People's Participation - Where Next? Children and Society 27(6): 484-495. DOI: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2012.00442.x Go to original source...
  8. Guidelines on child-friendly justice adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 17 November 2010 and explanatory memorandum. [online] [cit. 2023-06-15]. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/16806a452e
  9. Hultman E, Höjer S, Larsson M (2020). Age limits for participation in child protection court proceedings in Sweden. Child Fam Soc Work 25(2): 304-312. DOI:10.1111/cfs.12686. Go to original source...
  10. International Association of Youth and Family Judges and Magistrates Guidelines on Children in Contact with the Justice System. [online] [cit.2023-06-15]. Available from: https://juvenilejusticecentre.org/en/resources/guidelines-on-children-in-contact-with-the-justice-system-iayfjm/
  11. Judicial Academy (2022). Zlepšení přístupu zranitelných skupin osob ke spravedlnosti. [online] [cit 2023-06-15]. Available from: https://www.jacz.cz/images/Projekt_Zlepseni_pristupu_zranitelnych_skupin_osob_ke_spravedlnosti/Zlepseni_pristupu_zranitelnych_skupin_osob_ke_spravedlnosti.pdf
  12. Kišová E (2021). Názor dieťata a právný rámec ochrany jeho zisťovania, Bratislava: C. H. Beck, 152 p.
  13. Knetlová Z (2016). Praktické techniky zapojení dětí do rozhodovacích procesů. Metodika pro odborníky pracující s dětmi (pracovníky NNO: psychology, sociální pracovnice, etopedy, speciální pedagogy a další. České Budějovice: Krizové centrum pro děti a rodinu v Jihočeském kraji, z.ú., 24 p.
  14. Kratky N, Schröder-Abé M (2020). A court file analysis of child protection cases: What do children say? Child Fam Soc Work 25(S1): 169-177. DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12744. Go to original source...
  15. Littlechild B (2020). Children's Rights to Be Heard in Child Protection Processes: Law, Policy and Practice in England and Wales. Child Abuse Review 9(6): 403-415. DOI: 10.1002/1099-0852(200011/12)9:63.0.CO;2-9. Go to original source...
  16. Lundy L, McEvoy L, Byrne B (2011). Working With Young Children as Co-Researchers: An Approach Informed by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Early Educ Dev 22(5): 714-736. DOI: 10.1080/10409289.2011.596463. Go to original source...
  17. Martins PC, Oliveira VH, Tendais I (2018). Research with children and young people on sensitive topics - The case of poverty and delinquency. Childhood 25(4): 458-472. DOI: 10.1177/0907568218793931. Go to original source...
  18. Mayne F, Howitt Ch., Rennie LJ (2018). A hierarchical model of children's research participation rights based on information, understanding, voice, and influence. Eur Early Child Educ Res J 26(5): 644-656. DOI: 10.1080/1350293X.2018.1522480. Go to original source...
  19. Mol C (2022). The Child's Right to Participate in Family Law Proceedings. Cambridge: Intersentia, 442 p. Go to original source...
  20. Powell MA, Smith AB (2009). Children's Participation Rights in Research. Childhood 16(1): 124-142. DOI: 10.1177/0907568208101694. Go to original source...
  21. Rogalewiczová R (2018). Možnosti aktivního zapojení dítěte do řízení. Právní rozhledy 26(8): 267-275.
  22. Schrama W, Freeman M, Taylor N, Bruning M (eds). (2021). International Handbook on Child Participation in Family Law. Cambridge: Intersentia, 375 p. Go to original source...
  23. Seim S, Slettebø T (2017). Challenges of participation in child welfare. Eur J Soc Work 20(6): 882-893. DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2017.1320531. Go to original source...
  24. Šínová R, Kapitán Z (2019). Rodina v mezinárodních souvislostech. Prague: Leges, 310 p.
  25. Smeets DJH, Rap S (2021). Child Participation in Family Law Proceedings. Pedagogical Insights on Why and How to Involve Children. In: Schrama W, Freeman M, Taylor N, Bruning M (eds). International handbook on child participation in family law. Cambridge: Intersentia, 375 p. Go to original source...
  26. Turoy-Smith KM, Powell MB, Brubache SP (2018). Professional's Views about Child Interviews for Family Law Assessments. Fam Court Rev 56 (4): 607-622. DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12379. Go to original source...
  27. Warming H (ed.) (2013). Participation, Citizenship and Trust in Children's Lives. Palgrave Macmillan, 224 p. Go to original source...
  28. Westphalová L (2022). § 867 Zjištění názoru nezletilého dítěte. In: Králíčková Z, Hrušáková M, Westphalová L. Občanský zákoník II. Rodinné právo (§§ 655-975). Prague: C. H. Beck, 789 p.
  29. Woodman E, Roche S, McArthur M (2023). Children's participation in child protection - How do practitioners understand children's participation in practice? Child Fam Soc Work 28(1): 125-135. DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12947. Go to original source...
  30. Zakouřilová E (2014). Speciální techniky terapie rodin. Prague: Portál, 192 p.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.