Kontakt 2024, 26(4):392-398 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2024.055

Volunteering in hospitals to deal with emergenciesSocial Sciences in Health - Original article

Marie Klečková1, Lenka Michalcová2, *, Zuzana Freitinger-Skalická2
1 Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Kladno, Czech Republic
2 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Introduction: Volunteer activities during emergencies occur both formally and informally. In developed countries, emergencies are managed by professionals and formal volunteers. Spontaneous (informal) volunteers often respond at any stage, and this is known as convergent response. While these volunteers help prevent loss of life and property, their lack of organization and emergency knowledge poses risks, such as safety and responsibility issues. This leads professional responders to hesitate in using them. The implementation of effective integration strategies can significantly aid in emergencies.

Objective: This work focuses on volunteering in ensuring hospital crisis preparedness. The aim is to assess volunteering and identify applicable activities during emergencies, especially in hospitals. A methodical procedure for selecting suitable volunteers was developed using multi-criteria evaluation methods.

Methods: A systematic procedure for selecting volunteers was developed based on the implementation of multi-criteria evaluation methods. The implementation of multi-criteria decision-making methods offers an objective selection tool. Sequential steps are directed towards the selection of volunteers who will be competent in performing selected activities of healthcare personnel in hospitals during crisis preparedness. A step-by-step, organized, and targeted process is elaborated in individual, interconnected steps.

Results: The study defines a criteria model for selecting hospital volunteers during emergencies, including Professional Qualification, Length of Practice in Healthcare Fields, Volunteering Costs, and Driver's License Category B.

Keywords: Emergencies; Hospital; MEVYDO; Multi-criteria evaluation of options; TOPSIS; Volunteers
Conflicts of interest:

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Received: May 16, 2024; Revised: September 9, 2024; Accepted: November 25, 2024; Prepublished online: December 9, 2024; Published: December 17, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Klečková M, Michalcová L, Freitinger-Skalická Z. Volunteering in hospitals to deal with emergencies. Kontakt. 2024;26(4):392-398. doi: 10.32725/kont.2024.055.
Download citation

Attachments

Download fileKONT_Michalcova_1421_Supplement.pdf

File size: 224.72 kB

References

  1. Ağaç G, Şimşir İ (2022). Optimal site selection of a pandemic hospital using multi-criteria decision-making approach. Int J Anal Hierarchy Process 14(1). DOI: 0.13033/ijahp.v14i1.946. Go to original source...
  2. Alexander D (2010). The voluntary sector in emergency response and civil protection: review and recommendations. Int J Emerg Manage 7(2): 151-166. DOI: 10.1504/IJEM.2010.033654. Go to original source...
  3. Amaral T, Costa APC (2014). Improving decision-making and management of hospital resources: An application of the PROMETHEE II method in an Emergency Department. Oper Res Health Care 3(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.orhc.2013.10.002. Go to original source...
  4. Avenell S (2013). The evolution of disaster volunteering in Japan: From Kobe to Tohoku. Natural Disaster and Reconstruction in Asian Economies: A Global Synthesis of Shared Experiences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 35-50. DOI: 10.1057/9781137364166_3. Go to original source...
  5. Azman AI, Zaibidi NZ, Nawawi MKM, Ismail, MH, Khalid R (2023). The application of subjective weight in multi-criteria decision making in mathematics area: A bibliometric analysis. In AIP Conference Proceedings 2896(1). AIP Publishing. DOI: 10.1063/5.0179268. Go to original source...
  6. Bhalaji RKA., Bathrinath S, Ponnambalam SG, Saravanasankar S (2021). A Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method to Analyze Service Quality Risks in Healthcare Industries. In: Mohan S, Shankar S, Rajeshkumar G (Eds). Materials, Design, and Manufacturing for Sustainable Environment. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-9809-8_29. Go to original source...
  7. Buyukozkan G, Gocer F (2016). Selection of medical waste logistic firms by using AHP-TOPSIS methodology. Int J Biol Biomed 1: 14-18.
  8. Connors T (2011). The volunteer management handbook: Leadership strategies for success (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Go to original source...
  9. De Bruycker M, Greco D, Annino I, Stazi MA, de Ruggiero N, Triassi M, et al. (1983). The 1980 earthquake in southern Italy: rescue of trapped victims and mortality. Bull World Health Organ 61(6): 1021-1025.
  10. Hosseini S, Ahmadi Choukolaei H, Ghasemi P, Dardaei-beiragh H, Sherafatianfini S, Pourghader Chobar A (2022). Evaluating the performance of emergency centers during coronavirus epidemic using multi-criteria decision-making methods (case study: Sari city). Discret Dyn Nat Soc 2022: 1-13. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6074579. Go to original source...
  11. Hotchkiss RB, Fottler MD, Unruh L (2009). Valuing volunteers: the impact of volunteerism on hospital performance.
  12. Health Care manage Rev 34(2): 119-128. DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31819e919a. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Jones H (2004). Volunteering for health: A research report produced for the Welsh Assembly Government. Wales Council for Voluntary Action.
  14. Katsube T (2013). The Great japan Earthquake and Tsunami - Response and lessons learned. Japan International Cooperation Agency. [online] [cit. 2024-03-27]. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/tjem/229/4/229_287/_article Go to original source...
  15. Leng R (2015). Japan's Civil Society from Kobe to Tohoku. Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies 15(1).
  16. Mackwani Z (2015). Volunteers and the Alberta flood response: Insight into voluntary sector's readiness and surge capacity. Voluntary Sector Working Group of Canada's Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction, Ottawa.
  17. Omidvari F, Jahangiri M, Mehryar R, Alimohammadlou M, Kamalinia M (2020). Fire risk assessment in healthcare settings: Application of FMEA combined with multi-criteria decision making methods. Math Probl Eng 20: 1-12. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8913497. Go to original source...
  18. Orloff L (2011). Managing spontaneous community volunteers in disasters: a field manual. Boca Raton, 323 p. DOI: 10.1201/b11078. Go to original source...
  19. Pirani D, Safi-Keykaleh M, Farahi-Ashtiani I, Safarpour H, Jahangiri K (2022). The challenges of health volunteers management in COVID19 pandemic in Iran. J Health Organ Manag 36(7): 933-949. DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-05-2022-0146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Štverka Kořínková I, Chaloupková V, Gavurová B, Hrubcová D, Hnilicová H, Cmuntová K (2023). Metodika dobrovolnictví ve zdravotnictví [Methodology of Volunteering in Healthcare]. Prague: Ministry of Health of Czech Republic. [online] [cit. 2024-03-19]. Available from: https://mzd.gov.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Metodika-PDZS-ZTM.pdf
  21. Takao Y (2001). The rise of the "third sector" in Japan. Asian Surv 41(2): 290-309. DOI: 10.1525/as.2001.41.2.290. Go to original source...
  22. Twigg J, Mosel I (2017). Emergent groups and spontaneous volunteers in urban disaster response. Environ Urban 29(2): 443-458. DOI: 10.1177/0956247817721413. Go to original source...
  23. Voorhees WR (2008). New Yorkers respond to the world trade center attack: An anatomy of an emergent volunteer organization. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 16(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00530.x. Go to original source...
  24. Waldman S, Yumagulova L, Mackwani Z, Benson C, Stone JT (2018). Canadian citizens volunteering in disasters: From emergence to networked governance. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 26(3): 394-402. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12206. Go to original source...
  25. Yildirim FS, Sayan M, Sanlidag T, Uzun B, Ozsahin DU, Ozsahin I (2021). Comparative evaluation of the treatment of COVID-19 with multicriteria decision-making techniques. J Healthc Eng 2021: 8864522. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8864522. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.