Kontakt 2024, 26(4):392-398 | DOI: 10.32725/kont.2024.055
Volunteering in hospitals to deal with emergenciesSociální vědy ve zdraví - původní práce
- 1 Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Kladno, Czech Republic
- 2 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Introduction: Volunteer activities during emergencies occur both formally and informally. In developed countries, emergencies are managed by professionals and formal volunteers. Spontaneous (informal) volunteers often respond at any stage, and this is known as convergent response. While these volunteers help prevent loss of life and property, their lack of organization and emergency knowledge poses risks, such as safety and responsibility issues. This leads professional responders to hesitate in using them. The implementation of effective integration strategies can significantly aid in emergencies.
Objective: This work focuses on volunteering in ensuring hospital crisis preparedness. The aim is to assess volunteering and identify applicable activities during emergencies, especially in hospitals. A methodical procedure for selecting suitable volunteers was developed using multi-criteria evaluation methods.
Methods: A systematic procedure for selecting volunteers was developed based on the implementation of multi-criteria evaluation methods. The implementation of multi-criteria decision-making methods offers an objective selection tool. Sequential steps are directed towards the selection of volunteers who will be competent in performing selected activities of healthcare personnel in hospitals during crisis preparedness. A step-by-step, organized, and targeted process is elaborated in individual, interconnected steps.
Results: The study defines a criteria model for selecting hospital volunteers during emergencies, including Professional Qualification, Length of Practice in Healthcare Fields, Volunteering Costs, and Driver's License Category B.
Klíčová slova: Emergencies; Hospital; MEVYDO; Multi-criteria evaluation of options; TOPSIS; Volunteers
Střet zájmů:
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Vloženo: 16. květen 2024; Revidováno: 9. září 2024; Přijato: 25. listopad 2024; Zveřejněno online: 9. prosinec 2024; Zveřejněno: 17. prosinec 2024 Zobrazit citaci
Přílohy
Stáhnout soubor | KONT_Michalcova_1421_Supplement.pdf Velikost: 224.72 kB |
Reference
- Ağaç G, Şimşir İ (2022). Optimal site selection of a pandemic hospital using multi-criteria decision-making approach. Int J Anal Hierarchy Process 14(1). DOI: 0.13033/ijahp.v14i1.946.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Alexander D (2010). The voluntary sector in emergency response and civil protection: review and recommendations. Int J Emerg Manage 7(2): 151-166. DOI: 10.1504/IJEM.2010.033654.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Amaral T, Costa APC (2014). Improving decision-making and management of hospital resources: An application of the PROMETHEE II method in an Emergency Department. Oper Res Health Care 3(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.orhc.2013.10.002.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Avenell S (2013). The evolution of disaster volunteering in Japan: From Kobe to Tohoku. Natural Disaster and Reconstruction in Asian Economies: A Global Synthesis of Shared Experiences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 35-50. DOI: 10.1057/9781137364166_3.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Azman AI, Zaibidi NZ, Nawawi MKM, Ismail, MH, Khalid R (2023). The application of subjective weight in multi-criteria decision making in mathematics area: A bibliometric analysis. In AIP Conference Proceedings 2896(1). AIP Publishing. DOI: 10.1063/5.0179268.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Bhalaji RKA., Bathrinath S, Ponnambalam SG, Saravanasankar S (2021). A Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method to Analyze Service Quality Risks in Healthcare Industries. In: Mohan S, Shankar S, Rajeshkumar G (Eds). Materials, Design, and Manufacturing for Sustainable Environment. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-9809-8_29.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Buyukozkan G, Gocer F (2016). Selection of medical waste logistic firms by using AHP-TOPSIS methodology. Int J Biol Biomed 1: 14-18.
- Connors T (2011). The volunteer management handbook: Leadership strategies for success (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- De Bruycker M, Greco D, Annino I, Stazi MA, de Ruggiero N, Triassi M, et al. (1983). The 1980 earthquake in southern Italy: rescue of trapped victims and mortality. Bull World Health Organ 61(6): 1021-1025.
- Hosseini S, Ahmadi Choukolaei H, Ghasemi P, Dardaei-beiragh H, Sherafatianfini S, Pourghader Chobar A (2022). Evaluating the performance of emergency centers during coronavirus epidemic using multi-criteria decision-making methods (case study: Sari city). Discret Dyn Nat Soc 2022: 1-13. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6074579.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Hotchkiss RB, Fottler MD, Unruh L (2009). Valuing volunteers: the impact of volunteerism on hospital performance.
- Health Care manage Rev 34(2): 119-128. DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31819e919a.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
Přejít na PubMed...
- Jones H (2004). Volunteering for health: A research report produced for the Welsh Assembly Government. Wales Council for Voluntary Action.
- Katsube T (2013). The Great japan Earthquake and Tsunami - Response and lessons learned. Japan International Cooperation Agency. [online] [cit. 2024-03-27]. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/tjem/229/4/229_287/_article
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Leng R (2015). Japan's Civil Society from Kobe to Tohoku. Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies 15(1).
- Mackwani Z (2015). Volunteers and the Alberta flood response: Insight into voluntary sector's readiness and surge capacity. Voluntary Sector Working Group of Canada's Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction, Ottawa.
- Omidvari F, Jahangiri M, Mehryar R, Alimohammadlou M, Kamalinia M (2020). Fire risk assessment in healthcare settings: Application of FMEA combined with multi-criteria decision making methods. Math Probl Eng 20: 1-12. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8913497.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Orloff L (2011). Managing spontaneous community volunteers in disasters: a field manual. Boca Raton, 323 p. DOI: 10.1201/b11078.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Pirani D, Safi-Keykaleh M, Farahi-Ashtiani I, Safarpour H, Jahangiri K (2022). The challenges of health volunteers management in COVID19 pandemic in Iran. J Health Organ Manag 36(7): 933-949. DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-05-2022-0146.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
Přejít na PubMed...
- Štverka Kořínková I, Chaloupková V, Gavurová B, Hrubcová D, Hnilicová H, Cmuntová K (2023). Metodika dobrovolnictví ve zdravotnictví [Methodology of Volunteering in Healthcare]. Prague: Ministry of Health of Czech Republic. [online] [cit. 2024-03-19]. Available from: https://mzd.gov.cz/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Metodika-PDZS-ZTM.pdf
- Takao Y (2001). The rise of the "third sector" in Japan. Asian Surv 41(2): 290-309. DOI: 10.1525/as.2001.41.2.290.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Twigg J, Mosel I (2017). Emergent groups and spontaneous volunteers in urban disaster response. Environ Urban 29(2): 443-458. DOI: 10.1177/0956247817721413.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Voorhees WR (2008). New Yorkers respond to the world trade center attack: An anatomy of an emergent volunteer organization. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 16(1): 3-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00530.x.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Waldman S, Yumagulova L, Mackwani Z, Benson C, Stone JT (2018). Canadian citizens volunteering in disasters: From emergence to networked governance. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 26(3): 394-402. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12206.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
- Yildirim FS, Sayan M, Sanlidag T, Uzun B, Ozsahin DU, Ozsahin I (2021). Comparative evaluation of the treatment of COVID-19 with multicriteria decision-making techniques. J Healthc Eng 2021: 8864522. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8864522.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
Přejít na PubMed...
Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.